160 likes | 321 Views
S peeded Up E vent R ecognition. SUPER: Towards Real-time Event Recognition in Internet Videos. Yu-Gang Jiang School of Computer Science Fudan University Shanghai, China ygj@fudan.edu.cn. ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR), Hong Kong, China, Jun. 2012.
E N D
Speeded UpEvent Recognition SUPER: Towards Real-time Event Recognition in Internet Videos Yu-Gang Jiang School of Computer Science Fudan University Shanghai, Chinaygj@fudan.edu.cn ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR), Hong Kong, China, Jun. 2012. ACM ICMR 2012, Hong Kong, June 2012
The Problem • Recognize high-level events in videos • We’re particularly interested in Internet Consumer videos • Applications • Video Search • Personal Video Collection Management • Smart Advertising • Intelligence Analysis • … …
Our Objective Improve Efficiency Maintain Accuracy
The Baseline Recognition Framework Best Performing approach in TRECVID-2010 Multimedia event detection (MED) task Feature extraction SIFT Classifier Late Average Fusion χ2 kernel SVM Spatial-temporal interest points MFCC audio feature Yu-Gang Jiang, XiaohongZeng, Guangnan Ye, Subh Bhattacharya, Dan Ellis, Mubarak Shah, Shih-Fu Chang, Columbia-UCF TRECVID2010 Multimedia Event Detection: Combining Multiple Modalities, Contextual Concepts, and Temporal Matching, NIST TRECVID Workshop, 2010.
Three Audio-Visual Features… • SIFT (visual) • D. Lowe, IJCV ‘04 • STIP (visual) • I. Laptev, IJCV ‘05 • MFCC (audio) … 16ms 16ms
Bag-of-words Representation • SIFT / STIP / MFCC words • Soft weighting(Jiang, Ngo and Yang, ACM CIVR 2007) Bag-of-SIFT Bag of audio words / bag of frames: K. Lee and D. Ellis, Audio-Based Semantic Concept Classification for Consumer Video, IEEE Trans on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2010
Baseline Speed… • 4 Factors on speed: Feature, Classifier, Fusion, Frame Sampling Feature extraction Total: 1003 seconds per video ! SIFT Late Average Fusion Classifier Spatial-temporal interest points 82.0 χ2 kernel SVM MFCC audio feature 916.8 ~2.00 <<1 2.36 Feature efficiency is measured in seconds needed for processing an 80-second video sequence (for SIFT: 0.5fps). Classification time is measured by classifying a video using classifiers of all the 20 categories
Dataset: Columbia Consumer Videos (CCV) Basketball Non-music Performance Skiing Dog Wedding Reception Baseball Swimming Bird Wedding Ceremony Parade Soccer Biking Graduation Wedding Dance Beach Yu-Gang Jiang, Guangnan Ye, Shih-Fu Chang, Daniel Ellis, Alexander C. Loui, Consumer Video Understanding: A Benchmark Database and An Evaluation of Human and Machine Performance, in ACM ICMR 2011. Playground Cat Birthday Celebration Music Performance Ice Skating
Feature Options • (Sparse) SIFT • STIP • MFCC • Dense SIFT (DIFT) • Dense SURF (DURF) • Self-Similarities (SSIM) • Color Moments (CM) • GIST • LBP • TINY Uijlings, Smeulders, Scha, Real-time bag of words, approximately,in ACM CIVR 2009. Suggested feature combinations:
Classifier Kernels • Chi Square Kernel • Histogram Intersection Kernel (HI) • Fast HI Kernel (fastHI) Maji, Berg, Malik, Classification Using Intersection Kernel Support Vector Machines is Efficient,in CVPR 2008.
Multi-modality Fusion • Early FusionFeature concatenation • Kernel FusionKf=K1+K2+… • Late Fusionfusion of classificationscore MFCC, DURF, SSIM, CM, GIST, LBP MFCC, DURF
Frame Sampling K. Schindler and L. van Gool, Action snippets: How many frames does human action recognition require?, in CVPR 2008. • DURF Uniformly sampling 16 frames per video seems sufficient.
Frame Sampling • MFCC Sampling audio frames is always harmful.
Summary • Feature: Dense SURF (DURF), MFCC, plus some global features • Classifier: Fast HI kernel SVM • Fusion: Early • Frame Selection: Audio - No; Visual - Yes 220-fold speed-up!
email: ygj@fudan.edu.cn Thank you!