460 likes | 539 Views
Content of the p resentation. Progress and Crisis (2004-2006 and 2007-2013) Closure & Reporting (2004-2006) Systems and Simplification (2007-2013 and post 2013) Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) Lessons learned and Future (post 2014) Any Other Business and Conclusions.
E N D
Content of the presentation • Progress and Crisis (2004-2006 and 2007-2013) • Closure & Reporting (2004-2006) • Systems and Simplification (2007-2013 and post 2013) • Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) • Lessons learned and Future (post 2014) • Any Other Business and Conclusions
4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) 4.1. Organisation of the Programme Monitoring Committees (PMC)
Work of the PMCs organized in between the meetings • HU organizes general partnerships • SI organizes regular meetings
Percentage of the NGO partners in the PMCs • In EE and LT tis is 1/3 of the NGO partners in the PMCs • In HU it varies between 50-60% • In PL varies between 10-15% • In RO – 15-35%
4.2. Spending profile 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Advance payments and de-commitment target • 9 MS (CY, CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, MT, PL, SK) count advance payments into de-commitment target • BG, RO, SIdo not use this approach
Approach used when preparing spending profile • 6 MS (CZ, LT, LV, MT, PL, SK) have used top-down approach when preparing spending profile • 4 MS (BG, CY, HU, RO) have used bottom-up approach
4.3. Financial discipline 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Methods on how spending profiles are enforced on institutions • In CY, LT, LV, MT, SI - reallocation of funding in case targets are not met • In BGit is agreed on NSRF MC • In CZ - Political pressure • In HU - Monitor it and do reports on monthly bases • In PL - Motivation system
Decision maker on enforcing financial discipline • In BG – Deputy Prime Minister responsible for EU funds • In HU - Head of National Development Agency (NDA); the minister responsible for NDA
Specific measures of enforcing financial discipline on the beneficiaries
4.4. Management Information System (MIS) 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Payment claims and Functionality to monitor spending profile in MIS
Triggers and notifications in MIS • In CY, EE, HU, PL, SI, SK there are triggers and notifications in MIS (sections affected listed below in the table)
4.5. Evaluation plans 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Evaluation plans for the NSRF, OP 11 MS (except CY) have evaluation plans for the NSRF, OP
Type of evaluations planned in 2009/2010 • 5 MS (BG, CZ, EE, LT, LV) plan to carry out strategic evaluations • 7 MS (CY, HU, MT, PL, RO, SI, SK) plan to have Operational evaluations
Other topics of evaluations planned in 2009/2010 • CY - gender mainstreaming • CZ - indicators set up • EE - evaluation of indicators and smesectoral evaluations, plus the evaluation of OPs in light of the economic changes (in progress) • LT - evaluations, related to SPD ex post evaluations • MT - quality and relevance of monitoring
4.6. Evaluations launched, types of evaluations by content 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Steering groups coordinating evaluation activities’ • All 12 MShave steering groups that coordinate evaluation activities’
Financing planned for the organisation of the evaluation (% from the max available TA) N.B. For MT it is 16% for OP I and 11% for OP II
Evaluations • 11 MS (except CZ) have not carried out evaluations linked to the monitoring of the operational programmes where monitoring reveals a significant departure from the goals initially set • All 12 MS haveusedexternal expertise in carrying out evaluations
Number of staff working with evaluation issues in other institutions
4.7. Strategic report (SR) 4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013)
Preparatory work for drafting SR • 5 MS (CZ, LT, PL, RO, SI) have started making preparations for drafting the SR • 5 MS (CY, CZ, EE, LT, RO) have elaborated a time-frame for consulting, drafting and approving the SR
Structures to be used for consulting, drafting and approving SR • CY - MC plus other partnership mechanism • RO - Authority for Coordination of Structural Instruments is responsible for consulting and drafting the SR. The National Coordination Committee of SI (at ministers level) approves the SR • SK - not started yet
Additional guidance received on drafting and content of the SR • It is only PL who has received guidance from EC (DG Regio)
4. Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) 4.8. The Environmental Report as per Directive 2001/42
Requirements of the Directive into national legislation • In 7 MS (BG, CY, LV, MT, PL, RO, SI) requirements of the Directive are taken over in full into national legislation, including monitoring and reporting • In 5 MS (CZ, EE, HU, LT, SK) are taken over partially – only as far as the assessment is concerned; monitoring and reporting are not mandatory
Environmental monitoring • 10 MS (except LV, SK) will undertake the environmental monitoring within regular monitoring actions on the NSRF and the OP`s • LV, SKwill complement regular monitoring with a mid-term monitoring report