1 / 26

Overview of Governance Structures in US College Sport

Overview of Governance Structures in US College Sport. Chapter 08 Summer 2008-Online SLS 4155 Dr. Richard M. Southall The University of Memphis. Overview of College Sport. Paradoxical appeal since exciting in nature but wrought with problems

macon
Download Presentation

Overview of Governance Structures in US College Sport

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Governance Structures in US College Sport Chapter 08 Summer 2008-Online SLS 4155 Dr. Richard M. Southall The University of Memphis

  2. Overview of College Sport • Paradoxical appeal since exciting in nature but wrought with problems • Despite many schools dropping programs, consumer attraction continues to grow • More than a thousand colleges and universities offer intercollegiate sport • A huge component of the sport industry of North America

  3. History of Intercollegiate Athletics • Started as recreational activity organized by students • By mid-1890s, college administrators and faculty moved to take over control • 1906: Organization of Intercollegiate Athletic Association of the United States (IAAUS) and Canadian Interuniversity Athletic Union Central (CIAU-Central)

  4. History of the NCAA • 1910: IAAUS renamed National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) • 1921: First NCAA Championship held in track and field • 1951: Walter Byers hired as first Executive Director • 1973: Divisions created according to institutional size • Today: 38 national championships in 22 sports

  5. U. S. History of Intercollegiate Women’s Sport • Little female participation during early years • 1971: Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women (AIAW) established • 1980: First NCAA programs for women • 1981-82: NCAA passed new governance plan adding many new women’s championships • 1982: AIAW-NCAA merger (some would say “hostile takeover”) led to dissolution of AIAW

  6. NCAA Mission • Provide programming and deliver national championships • Goals are to promote college athletics, protect athlete interests, prepare athlete for life, and provide funding (NCAA, 2002) • http://www.ncaa.org

  7. NCAA Financials • Nonprofit but multimillion dollar enterprise • Revenues generated by television rights, championships, royalties, investments, sales, and contributions • Expenses include special events, revenue sharing, programs, management, and NCAA Foundation (NCAA, 2002) • Assets in excess of $128 million

  8. NCAA Membership • More than 1260 institutions, conferences, organizations, and individuals (NCAA, 2002) • Member institutions belong to Division I, II, or III • Over 1000 institutional members divided fairly evenly among each division

  9. Differences Between D-I, D-II, & D-III • See UMDrive for articles • Differences… • Historical Outline

  10. NCAA Governance Structure

  11. Strategic Plan • UMDrive • See: StrategicPlan5

  12. NCAA Division I Governance Structure

  13. Issues in College Sport • Commercial v. Educational “Institutional Logics” • Is college sport a business or is it educational in nature? • Fulfilling mission statement • Implications: • Tax-exempt status • Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) • Other issues • Anti-trust - See: White v. NCAA • Workers’ Compensation • See: • NCAA class action complaint • Class action certification • See UMDrive: • Method to March Madness…

  14. NAIA • Mission: • Promote education and development through intercollegiate athletics participation • Athletics as an integral part of education • Financials: • Not-for-profit funded through membership fees, sponsorship, merchandise sales, and national championships

  15. NAIA (cont.) • Membership: Over 300 members from mostly small U.S. and Canadian institutions in active and associate categories • Organizational structure: • Council of Presidents • Council of Athletics Administrators • Council of Faculty Athletics Representatives • Council of Affiliated Conferences and Independents

  16. Individual College Athletic Departments • Involvement by • University President • Athletic Board • Faculty Athletics Representative (FAR) • Athletic Director (AD) • Coaches

  17. Current Policy Area: Eligibility • Key issues: • Initial eligibility • Academic progress • Transfer students

  18. Current Policy Area: Amateurism • Key issues: • The line between amateur and professional sport • Rules to prohibit professionals from competition

  19. Current Policy Area: Substance Abuse and Performance Enhancement • Key issues: • Unequivocal opposition to doping in policy statements throughout North America • Student athlete consent forms as a component of eligibility • Education and enforcement • Random testing

  20. Current Policy Area: Financial Aid • Key issues: • Restrictions on the value of awards • Overpaying or withdrawing scholarships • Student athletes and part-time jobs

  21. Current Policy Area: Gender Equity • Key Issues: • Title IX compliance on individual campuses • Enforcing principles of equity and equality • Inequities played out in many ways

  22. Current Policy Area: Gambling • Key issues: • Concerns re internet wagering • Zero-tolerance policy and its rationale • Enforcement of rules resulting from policy

  23. Current Policy Area: Enforcement • Key issues: • Reduce violations through education, discovery, and disbursement of penalties • NCAA formal inquiry process • Self-reporting as means of policing infractions (NAIA, CIS, and CCAA)

  24. Current Policy Area: Funding • Key issues: • Myths surrounding funding issues in intercollegiate athletics • Connection to problems of national economies in U.S. and Canada • Policies formulated by NCAA and CIS to curb spending

More Related