Role of AONB Designation in the Planning Process Delivery of Planning Services in Statutory Designated Landscapes in Wa

1. Role of AONB Designation in the Planning Process Delivery of Planning Services in Statutory Designated Landscapes in Wales Lyndis Cole Principal LUC

2. Phase 1: Comparative assessment of planning delivery in statutory designated landscapes in England, Wales and Scotland

3. Work undertaken in Phase 1 • Describing the different planning delivery models for statutory protected landscapes in the UK • Comparing and contrasting how planning services are delivered

4. Hierarchy of Statutory Designated Landscapes 1. National Park Authorities with full planning powers (applies to all in England, Wales and Scotland apart from the South Downs and the Cairngorms)

5. Hierarchy of Statutory Designated Landscapes 2. National Park Authorities with shared planning powers (Cairngorms National Park, Scotland – five constituent LPAs deal with most planning applications but CNPA decides whether to call some in; and South Downs National Park – 15 constituent LPAs deal with most planning applications; NPA deals with applications for more significant development within the National Park) • Cairngorms: 2 additional aims (a) to promote sustainable use of natural resources; (b) to promote sustainable economic and social development of the area’s communities • The Cairngorms and South Downs NPAs responsible for preparing the Local Development Plan for the NP area • Cairngorms (5) and South Downs (15): Constituent authorities determine smaller applications and those in the larger settlements. NPAs determine more significant applications that may conflict with the national park purposes. 200613.6% of planning applications determined by NP falling to 9.2% of applications in 2010. • SDs 4,000 applications – 97% determined by the constituent authorities. • TEXT • TEXT

6. Hierarchy of Statutory Designated Landscapes 3. AONBs with Conservation Boards (Cotswolds and the Chilterns: no planning powers but have a Planning Committee and Planning Officer who comment on planning applications in the AONB) • AONB Conservation Boards can be created under the CRoW Act 2000. • All Conservation Boards made up of Secretary of State appointees; reps. of the constituent local authorities and reps. of the parish councils (some 35 members). All members take part in key decisions affecting the AONB. • All statutory planning functions remain with the constituent local authorities.

7. Hierarchy of Statutory Designated Landscapes 4. AONBs with Joint Advisory Committees / Partnerships (remaining English and all Welsh AONBs: able to comment on planning applications; a few employ their own Planning Officer) • Managed by a partnership of their constituent local authorities and other public and voluntary bodies with an interest in the land that they cover. • Gower (1 - 2), Anglesey (1), Llyn (1), Clwydian Range (2 - 3), and Wye Valley (3)

8. Hierarchy of Statutory Designated Landscapes 5. NSAs with Management Strategies adopted as SPGs (Dumfries and Galloway: 3 NSAs have Strategies and the Council employs an NSA officer to oversee their implementation) • SNH has identified the special qualities of every NSA (40) • Dumfries and Galloway Council pioneering use of Management Strategies adopted as SPG + dedicated NSA officer (primary emphasis on project work). • SNH has to be consulted on certain categories of development (i) schemes of 5 + houses; (ii) structures over 12m high; (iii) non residential development over 0.5 ha. • TEXT • TEXT

9. SUMMARY FINDINGS from Phase 2

10. Planning framework

11. Planning process (national approval rate 85.7%)

12. Stakeholder views • All recognised the need for high levels of protection in NPs and AONBs • But: • NPAs identified by environmental groups as not stringent enough in controlling development, especially large-scale tourism and housing developments . • Or too stringent by those representing rural industries, affordable housing and economic development. Characterised as ‘closed for business’, seeking to fossilise the landscape. • Designation seen as a double-edged sword for the local economy. • National Parks seen as strongly recognisable ‘islands’ with a very recognisable public image (covering 20% of Wales). • Conversely: • AONBs not picked out as being strongly constraining on development and no real influence on the delivery of affordable housing. • AONBs seen as part of the wider landscape and communities of the constituent local authority areas (5% of Wales). They are the most rural parts of these authorities.

13. Broad conclusions AONBs: constituent authorities need to develop a robust and consistent planning framework that reflects the national status of AONBs (equivalent to National Parks): Ensuring that the local development plan fully reflects the importance of the AONB landscape in its overall strategy Sharing of best practice across LPAs with AONBs. Promoting the shared training of members across LPAs with AONBs (as in the case of the NPAs). Ensuring that the AONB officer / Unit and Partnership has a distinct identity separate from the LPA. Adoption of the AONB statutory Management Plan or planning guidelines as SPG/SPD. Monitoring the effect of planning decisions on the landscape of AONBs. Improved enforcement.

14. A ‘can-do’ attitude • All relevant authorities and particularly NPAs need to: • Foster the National Parks (and AONBs) as living landscapes that evolve, whilst maintaining their special qualities and unique character. • Pro-actively seek sustainable socio-economic opportunities in harmony with the designation, identifying opportunities of mutual benefit. • In so-doing, for planning to work in close liaison with the socio-economic responsibilities of the constituent authorities, developing strong co-operation based on a common agenda and mutual respect. • For planning to have a ‘can-do’ outward facing mentality. • For an over-arching emphasis on sustainable design in keeping with surrounding landscape character, that emphasises the use of natural materials but is not solely embedded in the past.

15. Specific recommendations for AONBs • Guidance (NAAONBs?) should stress the equal importance of NPs and AONBs in planning terms • Statutory AONB Management Plans should include a specific section on planning (guidelines) within the AONB • These to be adopted as SPG/SPD by all constituent authorities • The AONB statutory designated landscape should be identified prominently in the introductory sections of the local development plans of the constituent authorities of AONBs • The development plans of constituent authorities to adopt a similar policy approach, requiring liaison between the different constituent authorities • NAAONBs to promote examples of socio-economic development that fit with the AONB statutory purpose • Planning functions to link with economic development and affordable housing functions of lpas. • Greater consistency in pre application advice.

16. Actions for AONB Partnerships • Promote consistent planning to the AONB boundary • Have planning guidelines for the whole AONB area, adopted by all constituent authorities • Forge links between the partnership and the Committees of the constituent authorities • Invite economic development officers, rural housing enablers and development managers from their constituent authorities to attend workshops to discuss the interplay of commercial and community needs with the purpose of statutory designation. • Remember these are LANDSCAPE DESIGNATIONS. • AONBs need collectively to reassert their importance. Underline that the planning tests are the same in National Parks and AONBs • Ensure that through the Taylor Review vital guidance is not lost.