190 likes | 489 Views
The Role of Educators in Language Planning and Policy. Alex Price PPS 6010 2 /17/11. Language Planning. Defined by Rubin (1976) as “ The study of solutions to language problems by authorized government organizations. ”
E N D
The Role of Educators in Language Planning and Policy Alex Price PPS 6010 2/17/11
Language Planning • Defined by Rubin (1976) as “The study of solutions to language problems by authorized government organizations.” • Actions taken and decisions made regarding planning and policy are deliberate • Formal- Official policies/legislation • Informal- Manipulation of attitudes towards language variations (media, social groups)
Language Behavior/Equity • Descriptive- Understanding the relationship between language behavior and social participation • How language is used • Diglosia- Using high status and low status languages in different contexts • Code Shifting- Why bilingual speakers choose to use one language over another • Relations of Dominance- How language establishes social dominance and status • Register shifts- How formal and informal language shapes the rules of interaction
Language Behavior/Equity • Evaluative- Describes how language behavior is shaping or changing • Efforts to standardize or purify a language • Preserve or revive endangered languages • Establish national languages • Legislation of language usage
Language Diversity- Problem, Right, or Resource? • Language diversity as a problem • linguistic genocide • socially and economically shortsighted
Language Diversity- Problem, Right, or Resource? • Language diversity as a right • helped to create bilingual education • Seen more as a transitional effort • expires when student shifts to English
Language Diversity- Problem, Right, or Resource? • Language diversity as a resource • valuable asset • socially and economically beneficial • more valuable than English only instruction
Fairclough’sCritical Language Analysis • Awareness of hidden levels of language • The text itself • Institutional influences • Social/cultural influences
Bourdieu: Language as Social Capital • Accumulated knowledge and experience used to assert power and status (Traveling, tutors, music lessons, etc.) • Just as valuable as cash
Equitable Education:The Classroom • eliminate “halo effect” • student grouping targets status differences • Student’s backgrounds are considered when planning instruction • Adequate time for primary language skills development
Equitable Education: School Level • Primary language tools shared among staff • Extra-duty tasks are adjusted to accommodate teachers who have to translate documents or develop primary language materials • Staff members with expertise are given time to collaborate with other teachers • Teachers involved in academically oriented extracurricular activities are given more money • Some intellectual competitions held in primary languages • Request principals to advocate for funding
Equitable Education: District Level • Teachers must influence policy or others will (politicians, demagogues) • Teachers request input about materials purchased by school district • Teacher training (English language development, primary language development)
Equitable Education: Parent/Community involvement • Welcoming and encouraging parents to participate in education • Parents can use school library to check out materials • School facilities available for community meetings
Equitable Education: Professional Organizations • Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) • National Association for Bilingual Education (NABE) • Start local affiliation
English as the Official Language? • Pros (Mario Mujica, chairman of US English) • Unites People • Empowers immigrants (No linguistic welfare) • Eliminates expensive duplication
English as the Official Language? • Cons (Edward Chen, American Civil Liberties Union) • Divides people (fosters bigotry) • Violates immigrants’ civil rights (denies fair and equal access) • Violates first amendment rights of elected officials and public employees • Makes government less efficient (miscommunication with communities)
Conclusion • “The belief that teachers have no role in language planning and language politics is a denial of professional responsibility, an abdication of authority”