1 / 33

Fuel Cells on the High Seas

Fuel Cells on the High Seas. Naval Applications for Fuel Cells Matt Chin and JC Sanders. Fuel Cell Types used on Ships. Molten Carbonate Large Surface Ships Proton Exchange Membrane Surface ships (usually in conjunction with Molten Carbonate fuel cells) Submarines.

madonna-beasley
Download Presentation

Fuel Cells on the High Seas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fuel Cells on the High Seas Naval Applications for Fuel Cells Matt Chin and JC Sanders

  2. Fuel Cell Types used on Ships • Molten Carbonate • Large Surface Ships • Proton Exchange Membrane • Surface ships (usually in conjunction with Molten Carbonate fuel cells) • Submarines

  3. Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells • Operation Temperature: 650 degrees C • Electrolyte: Salt Carbonates • Fuel: Syngas or Hydrogen, and • Additional: CO2 due to CO3 ion usage • Catalyst: Nickel • Power output: ~2MW units available

  4. Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells

  5. PEM Fuel Cells • Operation Temperature: 100 degrees C • Electrolyte: Polymer • Fuel: Hydrogen • Catalyst: Platinum • Power output: 50-250 kW units available

  6. PEM Fuel Cells

  7. Fuel cell advantages for surface ships • High efficiency vs. gas turbine and diesel powered naval vessels (40% vs. 16%-12%) • Reduced emissions of all types • Low vibration and sound levels • Improved thermal efficiencies • Reduced cost for fuel (30% less for Navy) • Ship design flexibility (modular units) • Permits the use of alternative fuels

  8. Fuel cell advantages for submarines • High efficiency vs. diesel powered submarines (40% vs. 16%-12%) • Low thermal profile compared to SSNs • Low vibration and sound levels • Reduced radar cross section • Does not require air breathing like diesel subs • Only has to come up every several weeks

  9. Practical Applications • Submarines • Fuel Cells = Silence = Increased Stealth • Fuel Cells = No air required = Longer dive times • Surface Ships • Fuel Cells = Increased efficiencies = Longer time out to sea • Fuel Cells = Reduced emissions = Reduced Profile (Harder to detect)

  10. Power Plan Efficiencies Courtesy of Edward House: Office of Navy Research

  11. Developers and Researchers • Germany – Working prototypes and service models of fuel cell submarines • Canada – Prototype for fuel cell submarine • United States – Prototypes and plans for both subs and surface ships • United Kingdom – Prototypes and plans for subs and surface ships

  12. Challenges to development • Fuel Type (Logistics and Fuel Reforming) • Cost and System Efficiency for Units • Reliability and Maintainability • Duty Cycle and Transient Response • Fuel Cell Life and Contamination • Fuel Cell Sensitivity to shocks and motion

  13. Challenges – Fuel Type • Unknown how fuel will react to shock • Infrastructure for storing not yet established • Method for extracting hydrogen from diesel not yet perfected

  14. Challenges – System Costs • Fuel is more expensive than other fuels • Platinum catalyst- very expensive • Hydrogen is expensive to process • High cost of raw materials

  15. Challenges – Contamination • Anything other than hydrogen will foul PEMs • Need to protect from salt water spray • Many existing sources of hydrogen contain sulfur and other contaminants

  16. Fuel Cell Power Plants • Power Output: 1kW – 2MW (per unit) • Internal Size and Structure: Flexible and modular (Can be placed throughout ship) • Fuel Type: Various (Hydrogen, Methanol, Diesel, Synthetic, Gasoline, etc.) • Cost: High (New Technology) • Maintenance: High (Due to lack of robustness) • Types of vessels: Submarines, Destroyers, Cutters

  17. Power Plant Comparisons Current Types of Power Plants used on Ships • Fuel Cell based Systems – The future of ships? • Diesel Electric – Workhorse of the world navies. • Gas Turbine – Successor to the Diesel Electric. • Nuclear Powered – Power overwhelming!

  18. Fuel Cell Submarine Germany’s HDW U214

  19. Fuel Cell Ship United States Navy DDX

  20. Diesel Electric Power Plants • Power Output: 1.5kW – 30MW • Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for battery block and motors, distributed system • Fuel Type: Diesel • Cost: Low (Well established systems, simpler) • Maintenance: Low (Very robust system) • Types of vessels: Submarines, Destroyers, Cruisers, Frigates, Command ships

  21. Diesel Electric Sub USS Blueback

  22. Diesel Electric Ship USS Leahy (Cruiser)

  23. Gas Turbine Power Plants • Power Output: 25kW – 100MW • Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for engines, centralized system • Fuel Type: Propane, natural gas, synthetics, diesel • Cost: Medium • Maintenance: Low • Types of vessels: Destroyers, Cruisers, Frigates

  24. Gas Turbine Ship US Oliver Perry Class Frigate

  25. Nuclear Power Plants • Power Output: 10MW – 300MW • Internal Size and Structure: Large Housing needed for reactor and shielding, centralized system • Fuel Type: Uranium enriched rods • Cost: Expensive • Maintenance: Low (Fairly robust system) • Types of vessels: Submarines, Aircraft Carriers, Cruisers

  26. Nuclear Powered Ship USS Nimitz (Aircraft Carrier)

  27. Nuclear Powered Sub USS Ohio (SSBN)

  28. Power Plant Comparisons CO2 Output: Fuel Cell 414 Diesel Electric 512 Gas Turbine 735 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

  29. Power Plant Comparisons NOX Output: Fuel Cell <0.001 Diesel Electric 12.9 Gas Turbine 6.0 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

  30. Power Plant Comparisons SOX Output: Fuel Cell 1.23 Diesel Electric 1.52 Gas Turbine 2.18 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in (grams)/(hp*hour) Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

  31. Power Plant Comparisons Annual Fuel Consumption/Costs: Fuel Cell 214,315 Diesel Electric 321,703 Gas Turbine 641,465 Based off of diesel fuel. NOTE: Measurements are in gallons/dollars 1 gallon ~ $1.00 US for Navy Data from: Office of Naval Research (2003)

  32. Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas? • In the United States • Surface Ships • US Navy DD(X) Destroyer Program (Land Attack) • US Navy CG(X) Cruiser Program (Detection/Interception) • Submarines • May utilize AIP fuel cell systems in future designs • In the World • 212A Class attack submarine (Germany, Italy) • Type 214 attack submarine (Greece, S. Korea) • Refit 209 Class attack submarine (Greece) • Type 800 Dolphin Class attack submarine (Israel)

  33. Future for Fuel Cells on the High Seas? Outlook for Fuel Cells: Pretty Good! • Two fully funded programs by US Navy • Adaptation for multiple sea platforms • Ongoing research in various countries • Sales of commercial units in Germany • Actual vessel deployment in some countries

More Related