1 / 29

Sentence-Level Effects on Alaskan Athabaskan Tone

Sentence-Level Effects on Alaskan Athabaskan Tone. Siri G. Tuttle, University of Alaska Symposium in Honor of G östa Bruce University of Lund, Sweden January 2007. Athabaskan Languages.

madonna-finley
Download Presentation

Sentence-Level Effects on Alaskan Athabaskan Tone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sentence-Level Effects on Alaskan Athabaskan Tone Siri G. Tuttle, University of Alaska Symposium in Honor of Gösta Bruce University of Lund, Sweden January 2007

  2. Athabaskan Languages The Athabaskan family is the largest indigenous language family in North America. It includes languages spoken in Alaska, western Canada, on the Oregon and California coasts, and in Arizona and New Mexico.

  3. Another View

  4. Athabaskan tonogenesis While many of the languages have lexical tonal systems from the same proto-Athabaskan source (loss of syllable-final glottalic consonants; Leer 1979, Krauss 1978, 2005), these vary in reflex: some languages have high tone, some low, and some no tone at all. This is true within Alaska as within the whole language family.

  5. Tone map in color

  6. Athabaskan languages in Alaska

  7. Tonal distribution in Alaska

  8. Typology of Athabaskan prosodies •  Tone – languages may or may not have lexical tone from proto-Athabaskan laryngealization • Tonal reflex – some languages have high tone, some low, from the same historical source •  Saturation – languages may or may not exhibit tonal saturation; many systems monovalent

  9. Non-tonal (Ahtna)

  10. Low-toned (Lower Tanana)

  11. High tone from historical source

  12. Low tone from historical source

  13. +Saturated • Navajo and Apache, with low tone from historic glottalization, have developed lexical high and mid tones on nearly all other prominent syllables (those with light vowels fall in with the low-toned), leaving few unmarked; these languages can be considered well-saturated. • Tanacross (high tone from historical source) is also well-saturated, with both high and low tones specified (Holton 2005).

  14. Saturated: San Carlos Apache

  15. -Saturated • In some of the eleven Alaskan Athabaskan languages, the majority of syllables are non-tonal, with only those reflecting proto-Athabaskan glottalization being “marked,” and the rest “unmarked,” to use terminology employed by Krauss and Leer. These languages can best be described as having sparse tonal systems.

  16. Unsaturated: Minto, Lower Tanana

  17. High tone spread in Tanacross

  18. Minto spreading, with antitone

  19. More Minto Spreading

  20. No rightward spreading - Minto

  21. Sentence type: question marker

  22. Sentence type: Minto negative

  23. Edge effects: final lowering

  24. Summary • Athabaskan languages in Alaska may have high, low or no tone from historic laryngealization. • Tone may be sparse or saturated. • Tone sandhi is found in both high and low toned languages • Intonation interacts with tone in all languages surveyed. • Saturation may affect the relationship with intonation.

  25. Masi ChwxThank you for listening

  26. Selected references • Krauss, Michael E. (2005). Athabaskan Tone. in Hargus, etc. pp. 55-136. • Krauss, Michael E. (1978, 2005) “Athabaskan Tone.” In Hargus, Sharon and Keren Rice, Editors, Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 51-136. • Krauss, Michael E. (1982) Notes on Salcha Athabaskan. Ms., Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center. • Krauss, Michael E. (1982) Report on field session with Ellen Frank, March 17, 1996, and tentative conclusions about Minto tone. Ms., Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center. • Jeff (1979) Proto-Athabaskan verb stem variation. Part 1: phonology. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers No. 3. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center. • Tuttle, Siri G. (1998a) Metrical and tonal structures in Tanana Athabaskan. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington. • Tuttle, Siri G. (1998b) Acoustic realizations of laryngeal contrasts in Minto Athabaskan obstruents. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103:3086 (Abstract). • Tuttle, Siri G. (2003) Archival Phonetics: Stress and Tone in Tanana Athabaskan. Anthropological Linguistics 45:3, pp. 316-336. • Tuttle, Siri G. (2005) Coronal ejectives in Ahtna Athabaskan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 2489 (2005) • Tuttle, Siri G. and Ellen Kaisse (1996) Tone loss in Minto (Lower Tanana) Athabaskan. CLS 32.

More Related