1 / 31

Lee Hartmann, University of Michigan

ONC: kinematics etc. Lee Hartmann, University of Michigan. Andi Burkert, John Tobin, Marina Kounkel, Fred Adams. large-scale A V map. Orion A/B. Rowles & Froebrich 2009. acceleration . Non-linear acceleration vs. position in filaments

Download Presentation

Lee Hartmann, University of Michigan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ONC: kinematics etc. Lee Hartmann, University of Michigan Andi Burkert, John Tobin, Marina Kounkel, Fred Adams

  2. large-scale AV map Orion A/B Rowles & Froebrich 2009

  3. acceleration Non-linear acceleration vs. position in filaments (Bonnell et al 1992)- “edge effect” in ~ 1 dimension make concentrations (clusters) at ends

  4. Evidence for large-scale gravity; focusing in elongated clouds causes clusters to form preferentially at ends (Bonnell; Burkert & LH, “focal points”) Orion A/B Pipe (Lombardi) NGC 2264 (Sung+) Perseus (Rebull)

  5. Orion A (Hartmann & Burkert 2007); elliptical sheet, smooth density gradient, ~ 2 Myr evolution 13CO, Bally et al. cluster Short radius of curvature results in extra mass concentrations  assemble cluster gas/stars

  6. Carpenter + 2001 RV 1 pc 1pc/2 km/s ~ 0.5 Myr 1 pc HH98, e ~ 0.3

  7. (2GM/R)1/2 ~ 3 km/s (4000 M☉/4 pc)1/2

  8. fixed gas potential; N body

  9. spherical, subvirial elongated, subvirial, major axis elongated, subvirial, 30o elongated, virial, 30o

  10. Megeath et al.

  11. caustic? why only one side? asymmetry of mass distribution?

  12. histogram = * 13CO Jones & Walker 88 1D FWHM (proper motion)

  13. Foreground contamination? ONC Briceno et al.

  14. What accounts for the stellar/13CO velocity offset? stellar motions? stars moving away from us too extincted for optical study? < problem? velocity widths already seem to be ≥ Jones/Walker p.m. dispersion

  15. What accounts for the stellar/13CO velocity offset? evaporation/blowout of dense gas? < works for ONC/1977(?), but what about OMC 2/3?

  16. What accounts for the stellar/13CO velocity offset? gravitational collapse + dissipation to make narrow filament? < OMC 2/3?

  17. crazy idea; “some stars left behind?” later generation? 1st generation less redshifted (running into denser gas)? need to understand time evolution of region

  18. NGC 2264 – Kounkel, Tobin et al. in prep

  19. kinematics: not equilibrium – constraint on timescales? gravity is important, but details uncertain need to understand time evolution of region ?

  20. histogram = * 13CO foreground 1a pop?

  21. Velocity fields not particularly random (G x 105 M(sun)/15 pc)1/2 ~ 5 km/s how do you avoid gravitationally-generated motion?? 30 pc Orion A 13CO; Bally et al. 1987

  22. factor in efficiency; pre-existing cloud structure?

  23. Simulations of cloud flow with gravity show accelerating collapse Vazquez-S. Heitsch ages of ONC stars??

  24. Orion Nebula region Megeath et al. 2012 T Tauri stars Protostars: collapse down to extremely dense filament Pgrav >> P(ISM)

More Related