1 / 18

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan AMIP

Administration Conclusions. 2. As implemented with this new adaptive management implementation plan, the 2008 Biological Opinion (BiOp):Is biologically and legally soundIs based on the best available scientific informationSatisfies the ESA jeopardy standardThe current BiOp reflects great regiona

majed
Download Presentation

FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan AMIP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP)

    5. Adaptive Management Implementation Plan Accelerates and enhances certain BiOp mitigation actions Enhances research and monitoring to evaluate fish status and habitat conditions A new contingency plan to address the possibility of a significant decline in the abundance of listed fish and biological triggers that result in contingency actions Dam breaching studies as a contingency of last resort Ongoing commitments to regional collaboration and science review

    9. Abundance of naturally produced (not hatchery produced) adult SR spr/sum Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam (1979 – 2008). Data are from dam counts, with estimate of wild fraction based on scale analysis. Note: Low abundance in 1994 & 1995 and high abundance in 2001-2004.Abundance of naturally produced (not hatchery produced) adult SR spr/sum Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam (1979 – 2008). Data are from dam counts, with estimate of wild fraction based on scale analysis. Note: Low abundance in 1994 & 1995 and high abundance in 2001-2004.

    10. 4-Year rolling average of abundance of naturally produced (not hatchery produced) adult SR spr/sum Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam (1982 – 2008). Data are four year average of previous slide (i.e., average of 2003, 04, 05, and 06 adult returns would make up the 2006 4-year average. Note: Low abundance in 1994 & 1995 translate into low four-year averages in 1996, 97, 98, and 99. High abundance in 2001-2004 translate into high four year averages in 2001 through 2006. 4-Year rolling average of abundance of naturally produced (not hatchery produced) adult SR spr/sum Chinook Salmon at Lower Granite Dam (1982 – 2008). Data are four year average of previous slide (i.e., average of 2003, 04, 05, and 06 adult returns would make up the 2006 4-year average. Note: Low abundance in 1994 & 1995 translate into low four-year averages in 1996, 97, 98, and 99. High abundance in 2001-2004 translate into high four year averages in 2001 through 2006.

    11. Tripping the Early Warning Indicator Within 120 days of NOAA Fisheries determining that an Early Warning Indicator was tripped, the Action Agencies (in coordination with NOAA Fisheries, the RIOG, and other regional parties) will: Evaluate the likely status of the species in question; Determine whether a Significant Decline Trigger is likely to be tripped; If so, determine what Rapid Response Actions to take Implement actions as soon practicable (not later than 12 months after indicator observed)

    12. Within 90 days of NOAA Fisheries’ determining that the Significant Decline Trigger was tripped, the Action Agencies (in coordination with NOAA Fisheries, the RIOG, and other regional parties) would: Determine which Rapid Response Actions to take for a particular species; and Implement the actions as soon as practicable (not later than 12 months after the trigger occurs)

More Related