1 / 7

ENGL 2307

ENGL 2307 . 12 June 2014. Today’s Plan. Looking forward Edgar Allan Poe “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar” Peer Review. Looking Forward. Friday (AKA tomorrow)—Essay 1 due by 11:59 PM on Blackboard Monday—Midterm 10 points

malaya
Download Presentation

ENGL 2307

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENGL 2307 12 June 2014

  2. Today’s Plan • Looking forward • Edgar Allan Poe • “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar” • Peer Review

  3. Looking Forward • Friday (AKA tomorrow)—Essay 1 due by 11:59 PM on Blackboard • Monday—Midterm • 10 points • Any texts up to Monday’s class are possible subjects for the questions • Short answer (sentence) questions related to readings • Long answer questions (paragraph) focused on analysis • Tuesday—Homework 5 • Analysis of student draft in WEaL

  4. Edgar Allan Poe • Born 1809, died 1849 • Master of horror • Editor of several magazines • Dupin stories are the inspiration for Sherlock Holmes • Wrote mostly short stories and poems, but also some non-fiction (essays, reviews, etc) and a novel (The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket)

  5. “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar” • Published later in Poe’s life (1845) • Presented as factual (similarly to The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket in 1838) • Magazine publication in America first, then in England

  6. “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar” • Narrator • Set up of the story • Reversal of haunting (the body is there, but still dead) • Mesmerism • Medical terminology

  7. Peer Review • Identify the thesis. Does it follow the three elements we discussed yesterday (arguable, narrow, offers so what)? • Is the organization/paragraphing clear and logical? • Does the textual evidence support the topic sentences and thesis? • Is the secondary source supportive and not at the forefront of the argument? • Does the conclusion feel finished? Are there questions left? • Is the MLA format correct (paper layout, in-text citation, works cited)?

More Related