1 / 24

Game Theory

Game Theory. Mike Shor Lecture 13. “ Necessity never made a good bargain ”. - Benjamin Franklin. Economic Markets. Allocation of scarce resources Many buyers & many sellers  traditional markets Many buyers & one seller  auctions One buyer & one seller  bargaining.

malcolm-larsen
Download Presentation

Game Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Game Theory Mike ShorLecture 13 “Necessity never made a good bargain” - Benjamin Franklin

  2. Economic Markets • Allocation of scarce resources • Many buyers & many sellers  traditional markets • Many buyers & one seller  auctions • One buyer & one seller  bargaining

  3. Role of Game Theory • Design non-traditional markets Market Design, Inc. Charles River Associates NERA Economic Consulting Open Options LECG

  4. The Move to Game-Theoretic Bargaining • Baseball • Each side submits an offer to an arbitrator who must chose one of the proposed results • Meet-in-the-Middle • Each side proposes its “worst acceptable offer” and a deal is struck in the middle, if possible • Forced Final • If an agreement is not reached by some deadline, one party makes a final take-it-or-leave-it offer

  5. Bargaining & Game Theory • Art: Negotiation • Science: Bargaining • Game theory’s contribution: • to the rules of the encounter CAVEAT: Limited Applicability

  6. Outline • Importance of rules: The rules of the game determine the outcome • Diminishing pies: The importance of patience • Estimating payoffs: Trust your intuition

  7. Take-it-or-leave-it Offers • Consider the following bargaining game (over a cake): • I name a take-it-or-leave-it split. • If you accept, we trade • If you reject, no one eats! • Under perfect information, there is a simple rollback equilibrium

  8. Take-it-or-leave-it Offers • Second period: Accept if p > 0 • First period: Offer smallest possible p The “offerer” keeps all profits 1-p , p accept p reject 0 , 0

  9. Counteroffers and Diminishing Pies • In general, bargaining takes on a “take-it-or-counteroffer” procedure • If time has value, both parties prefer trade earlier to trade later • E.g. Labor negotiations – Later agreements come at a price of strikes, work stoppages, etc. • Delays imply less surplus left to be shared among the parties

  10. Two Stage Bargaining • Bargaining over division of a cake • I offer a proportion, p, of the cake to you • If rejected, you may counteroffer (and  of the cake melts) • Payoffs: • In first period: 1-p , p • In second period: (1-)(1-p) , (1-)p

  11. Rollback

  12. Rollback • Since period 2 is the final period, this is just like a take-it-or-leave-it offer: • You will offer me the smallest piece that I will accept, leaving you with all of 1- and leaving me with almost 0 • What do I do in the first period?

  13. Rollback • Give you at least as much surplus • Your surplus if you accept in the first period is p • Accept if: Your surplus in first period  Your surplus in second period p  1-

  14. Rollback • If there is a second stage, you get 1- and I get 0. • You will reject any offer in the first stage that does not offer you at least 1-. • In the first period, I offer you 1-. • Note: the more patient you are (the slower the cake melts) the more you receive now!

  15. First or Second Mover Advantage? • Are you better off being the first to make an offer, or the second?

  16. Example: Cold Day • If =1/5 (20% melts) • Period 2: You offer a division of 1,0 • You get all of remaining cake = 0.8 • I get 0 = 0 • In the first period, I offer 80% • You get 80% of whole cake = 0.8 • I get 20% of whole cake = 0.2

  17. Example: Hot Day • If =4/5 (80% melts) • Period 2: You offer a division of 1,0 • You get all of remaining cake = 0.2 • I get 0 = 0 • In the first period, I offer 20% • You get 20% of whole cake = 0.2 • I get 80% of whole cake = 0.8

  18. First or Second Mover Advantage? • When players are impatient (hot day) First mover is better off • Rejecting my offer is less credible since we both lose a lot • When players are patient (cold day) Second mover better off • Low cost to rejecting first offer • Either way – if both players think through it, deal struck in period 1

  19. Don’t Waste Cake • Why doesn’t this happen? • Reputation building • Lack of information COMMANDMENT In any bargaining setting, strike a deal as early as possible!

  20. Examples • British Pubs and American Bars • Civil Lawsuits • If both parties can predict the future jury award, can settle for same outcome and save litigation fees and time • If both parties are sufficiently optimistic, they do not envision gains from trade

  21. Uncertainty in Civil Trials • Plaintiff sues defendant for $1M • Legal fees cost each side $100,000 • If each agrees that the chance of the plaintiff winning is ½: • Plaintiff: $500K - $100K = $ 400K • Defendant: - $500K - $100K = $-600K • If simply agree on the expected winnings, $500K, each is better off

  22. Uncertainty in Civil Trials • What if both parties are too optimistic? • Each thinks that his or her side has a ¾ chance of winning: • Plaintiff: $750K - $100K = $ 650K • Defendant: - $250K - $100K = $-350K • No way to agree on a settlement!

  23. Non-Monetary Utility • How big is the cake? • Is something really better than nothing?

  24. Lessons • Rules of the bargaining game uniquely determine the bargaining outcome • Which rules are better for you depends on patience, information • What is the smallest acceptable piece? Trust your intuition • Delays are always less profitable: Someone must be wrong

More Related