1 / 17

Supervisor: Eike Middell

Kate Husband Cambridge University, UK Development of an Online Filter for Selection of Cascade-like Events in IceCube. Supervisor: Eike Middell. Signals. IceCube looks for high-energy astrophysical n E.g. from supernova remnants Also detects atmospheric n ’s

malha
Download Presentation

Supervisor: Eike Middell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kate HusbandCambridge University, UK Development of an Online Filter for Selection of Cascade-like Events in IceCube Supervisor: Eike Middell

  2. Signals • IceCube looks for high-energy astrophysical n • E.g. from supernova remnants • Also detects atmospheric n’s • Primary cosmic rays produce muons which is the main background to IceCube.

  3. IceCube • 1km3 high energy, n telescope at S Pole • Contains DOMs with PMT which record amp. & time of photons • Ice contains dust particles and air bubbles so photons scatter

  4. Events: Cascade-like • n interact through weak force only • Quarks produce cascade of Cherenkov photons • Photon intensity decays rapidly • Muons can also knock out e- resulting in em cascade

  5. Events: Track-like • Muons move close to c • Don’t lose much energy in producing Cherenkov light • Only arrive from above detector as decay quickly • Hence long straight downwards tracks

  6. Multi- Vs. Single-Peak • If triggered, DOM records continuous waveform • Try and fit pulses of different times and amp. into waveform = MULTI-PEAK (mp) OR 2. Find no. of photons from total amplitude and give all photons the same time = SINGLE-PEAK (sp)

  7. AIMs • Online filter must separate multiple background events from signal within constraints. • Constraints: limited bandwidth & CPU power • Aim to improve efficiency by looking at possible new single-peak cut variables

  8. A. ToI • Each DOM is given a mass proportional to amount of charge it records • Centre of gravity of distribution is used as approx. to interaction vertex • Good cut variable as spherical n ~0.3, tracks ~0.

  9. B. LineFit Velocity • Fits a straight line through triggered DOMs • Var(time) is not a good cut variable

  10. Charge weighting doesn’t increase separation

  11. C: Cumulative Charge • Cumulative sum of charge of each DOM over time • Take time at x% of total charge to get tx • Single-peak

  12. ~t75 found to give largest separation

  13. D: Charge Propagation • Decay of charge-energy ratio different • Total charge ≈energy and centre of gravity ≈ interaction vertex • Single-peak

  14. Mean on new axis for each event weighted with distance is new variable: MCD

  15. Optimization • Previous filter: vel+ToI (mp): 71.7% ne (smaller detector) • New filter: MCD+ToI (sp): 73% ne

  16. Energy Efficiency • New filter is slightly better at low energies • Blue: vel +ToI (mp), Red:MCD+ToI (sp)

  17. Summary • LineFit velocity cannot be replaced by variance of time • New single-peak cut variables: t75 and MCD • New filter suggested with MCD>61.4, ToI>0.14 passing 73.0% sig. for 1% bkd. • New filter has slightly better low energy efficiency.

More Related