1 / 23

Title III Updates & AMAOs

Title III Updates & AMAOs. Jacqueline A. Iribarren , Title III Susan Ketchum , Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008. FLEP Bulletin: Summer 2008.

mandar
Download Presentation

Title III Updates & AMAOs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Title IIIUpdates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008

  2. FLEP Bulletin: Summer 2008 • Exit: ACCESS for ELLsTM composite score of 6.0 or by meeting reclassification criteria for (seeESEA Bulletin 7.02: Reclassification of ELL Students as Fully English Proficient, August 2007) • 2-year monitoring requirement • Districts must have a process in place for monitoring/reviewing these decisions • ESEA Bulletin 8.01: http://esea.dpi.wi.gov/files/esea/pdf/bul_0801.pdf

  3. ACCESS for ELLsTM Counts • 2006: 33,402 took WI’s ELP Exam • 57% Spanish speakers • 29% Hmong speakers • 14% other languages • 2007: 44,812 took WI’s ELP Exam • 57% Spanish speakers • 26% Hmong speakers • 17% other languages • 2008: 47,471took WI’s ELP Exam • 61% Spanish speakers • 24% Hmong speakers • 15% other languages

  4. LanguagesReported on ACCESS for ELLsTM2008

  5. ACCESS for ELLsTM2008 Composite Scores

  6. Reading Achievement - WINSS 24,480 FAY Grades 3-8,10 ELL students 54.7%Proficient & Advanced in 2007-08

  7. Mathematics Achievement - WINSS 24,480 FAY Grades 3-8,10 ELL students52.5%Proficient & Advanced in 2007-08

  8. Were we started . . . • Chapter PI-13 Limited-English Proficient Pupils, Wisconsin Administrative Code (1985, 2002, revised Register, June 2004, No. 582) • ESEA Act of 2001, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) • Title III Regulations • DPI & WIDA partner states create ELP Standardsgrade clusters: K-2, 3-5, 6-8 and 9-12; language domains: listening, speaking, reading and writing • Wisconsin’s English Language Proficiency Examination, ACCESS for ELLsTM developed

  9. 2003Interim AMAO Targets: • Stakeholders including DPI & WIDA ESL/Bilingual education professionals • Cut scores set on the four ELP instruments (using performance standards as guides) • Local data on past performance from districts informed the setting of Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) • 90% of ELP Level 1students progress one language level in one year. • 90% of ELP Levels 2-4progress by at least½ language level in one year. • 90% of ELP Level 5 students become fully proficient in one year.

  10. 2005-06 School-Year • ACCESS for ELLsTM adopted as the English Language Proficiency (ELP) assessment in Wisconsin • WSLS and Individual Student Enrollment System (ISES) Implemented • Stakeholder meetings discussed AMAO target revisions

  11. 2006-07 School Year • ELL Advisory Task ForceandAMAO Focus Group meetings reviewed student ELP growth using two years’ scores from ACCESS for ELLsTM • Revisions of AMAO targets and cohort descriptions submitted to USED/OELA • AMAO determinations were required for SY2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07 • Required LEAs to inform parents if they or their consortium had not met AMAO targets

  12. RevisedAMAO Targets and Cohort Description AMAO 1: Progress in English language acquisition • 50% of the students in ELP Levels 1-4 must make the expected progress • Six Cohorts: ELP Levels 1-2 & 3-4; Grades K-2, 3-8 & 9-12

  13. AMAO 1:Expected Progress Initial English Language Proficiency (ELP) Level

  14. AMAO 2 Exiting or attainment of English language proficiency: 20% of ELL students with ELP Level 5 + new Level 6 (students exiting)

  15. Title III Sanctionsfor missed AMAOs • First Year:parent notification began with SY 2005-06 & 2006-07 • Second Year: • parent notification • technical assistance • develop an improvement plan

  16. AMAO 1: Progressing in English Language Acquisition 2007-08 Target: 50% of theCohort (ELP Levels 1-4) must meet ELP Progress RequirementA 0.8 ELP LevelB 0.7 ELP LevelC 0.6 ELP LevelD 0.5 ELP LevelE 0.4 ELP LevelF 0.3 ELP Level

  17. AMAO 2: Exiting or Reaching English Language Proficiency 2007-08 Target: 20% of ELL Students Eligible to Exit N students who achieved ELP Level 6 (divided by)N students eligible or expected to achieve ELP Level 6

  18. AMAO 3: ELL-Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP determinations are made under Title I reporting processes. They can be accessed by each District Assessment Coordinator at http://oea.dpi.wi.gov/oea_ellamaoin the Annual Review of District Performance.

  19. Summary Determinations Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives(AMAO) • Progressing in English language acquisition • Exiting or reaching English language proficiency • ELL-Adequate Yearly Progress Overall Status

  20. District Detail A district belonging to a consortium for ELL services will see their district’s results for informational purposes only. District Detail Member districts generally do not have sufficient numbers of ELL students to calculate separate AMAO determinations. The report reflects aggregate results for the consortium as a whole. Consortia summary data are used in accountability determinations. District-only AMAO counts are provided in the District Detail table for informational purposes, and can be used for planning/evaluation within the member district.

  21. Fall 2008 • Update WSLS and ISES Year-End ELP codes by September 30th – DPI pilot data pull • Preliminary Notice to districts & consortia that did not meet targets based on changes from 2007 to 2008 ACCESS for ELLsTM, and 3rd Friday Count Date to Year-End ISES ELP codes 2007-08 • 30-day appeal period –data error review • ISES Year End Data reviewed – October 27th • Final AMAO determinations – early November • Electronic AMAO reports planned

  22. Contact Information: Susan Ketchum, Accountability ConsultantOffice of Educational Accountability 608.267.0425 susan.ketchum@dpi.wi.gov Jacqueline Iribarren, Title III Consultant Content and Learning Team 608.266.7292 jacqueline.iribarren@dpi.wi.gov Visit our website:http://oea.dpi.wi.gov

  23. Further Information Resources, timelines, and contacts may be found on the DPI website: • Accountability for ELLshttp://oea.dpi.wi.gov/oea_ellamaohttp://oea.dpi.wi.gov/oea_calend • District WSLS/ISES Contacts http://lbstat.dpi.wi.gov/files/lbstat/xls/wslsisesadm.xls • Programs Serving ELLshttp://ell.dpi.wi.gov/ell_servingells • Provisions of ESEA Title IIIhttp://esea.dpi.wi.gov/esea_tiiisummary • Standards & Assessments for ELLshttp://oea.dpi.wi.gov/oea_ells

More Related