1 / 20

Properties of Extrasolar Planets

Properties of Extrasolar Planets . Roman Rafikov (Institute for Advanced Study). Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects. Methods of detection. Methods of detection. Methods of detection.

mandel
Download Presentation

Properties of Extrasolar Planets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Properties of Extrasolar Planets Roman Rafikov (Institute for Advanced Study) • Methods of detection • Characterization • Theoretical ideas • Future prospects

  2. Methods of detection Methods of detection

  3. Methods of detection Planetary motion around pulsar causes periodic pulsar displacement around the center of mass by light-seconds for Earth-like planet ( g ) at AU from the neutron star ( ) – well within current detection capabilities. Planet NS WD Pulsar timing m sin i degeneracy (broken in PSR 1257+12 by planetary interaction) First discovered extrasolar system: PSR 1257+12 (Wolszczan and Frail 1992) Second suggested system: PSR 1620-26 (Backer et al. 1993) Similar to Solar System Recently confirmed (Sigurdsson et al 2003) to have a giant planet in a wide eccentric orbit. Similar to nearby EGP systems.

  4. Methods of detection Butler et al 2004 Keck GL 436 Radial Velocity Variations Planetary motion moves star around with velocity. Jupiter-mass planet at 1 AU causes stellar motion with velocity 30 m/s. Searching for periodic Doppler shifts can detect planet (like companion in spectroscopic binary). • Method suffers from m sin i degeneracy • Velocity noise can be pushed down to 1-2 m/s • Up to now the most successful technique – more than 100 planets detected • First detection - 51 Peg (Mayor & Queloz 1995)

  5. Methods of detection Jupiter-size planet passing in front of the star causes stellar flux drop (eclipse) by for ~ hours. Transit probability for AU • More than 20 transit searches are underway • 1 planet detected (4 more – OGLE transits ) • Great ancillary science for time-variable phenomena searches (GRB monitoring campaigns, microlensing searches) TrES-1 (Alonso et al 2004) First transit detection in previously known planetary system HD 209458 (Charbonneau et al 2000) Planetary Transits • Combined with RV data gives mass (sin i =1) • The only method which gives planetary size • Expect signal also in reflected light • Systematic effects (blends, etc.)

  6. Methods of detection Bond et al 2004 Bond et al 2004 Planetary mass Stellar mass Semimajor axis Distance to the system Microlensing • Gravitational lensing by binary systems leads to easily recognizable pattern of magnification. • Light curve fitting yields system parameters and may be used for planet searches. • Cannot repeat observation • Usually distance is unknown • Stellar brightness unimportant OGLE 2003-BLG-235/MOA 2003-BLG-53 (first planet detection by microlensing)

  7. Methods of detection Jupiter-mass planet at 1 AU moves its star around by which for AU at 10 pc results in 100 µas displacement on the sky. • Sensitive to massive and distant planets – requires long time baseline • In combination with RV data breaks m sin i degeneracy and determines mass and orbit orientation (similar to observations of stars near the Sgr A*) • Requires exquisite astrometric accuracy. Benedict et al (2002) may have detected astrometric signal from previously known planet Gliese 876b (~ 2 M_J, 0.3 AU) using fine guidance sensors on HST. Future missions should revolutionize this field (Keck Interferometer, SIM). Astrometry

  8. Methods of detection

  9. Characterization Results: characteristics of extrasolar planets

  10. Characterization General Statistics • 120 planetary systems, 138 planets, 15 multiple systems • 5 by transits • 4 by pulsar timing • 1 by microlensing • 110 by radial velocity searches Dynamical Characteristics • Unusual distribution of semimajor axes – many planets very close to the star • - Incomplete beyond several AU • - Very significant within 1 AU (“Hot Jupiters”) • Predominance of planets with large eccentricities for periods longer than several days • - closest ones are circularized by stellar tides • - e-distribution is close to that of binary stars Very different from Solar System planets!

  11. Characterization • High masses (only recently RV started probing Neptune mass range). • Larger number of lower mass planets. • “Brown dwarf desert” – relative lack of planets heavier than . • Planetary sizes consistentwith expectations except that • Radius of HD 209458 is too large to be accomodated by simple models. • Clear correlation between the metallicity of the parent main-sequence star and the probability of hosting planet. • Pulsar planet in M4 may have formed in very low-Z environment; planets around PSR 1257+12 may have formed from very high-Z material. Physical Properties

  12. Characterization HST transit curve (Brown et al 2001) • Mass , period 3.5 d, AU • Parent star (G0 V) at a distance of 47 pc • Radius of is a challenge for theory Direct probe of planetary atmosphere • Na absorption detected in transit – atmospheric signature(Charbonneau et al 2002) • Extended absorbing region in H-alpha – envelope of escaping hydrogen(Vidal-Madjar et al 2003) • Evidence for oxygen and carbon in this escaping envelope • Gas loss rate g/s • Evaporation time is more than a Hubble time Simulation from (Vidal-Madjar et al 2003) HD 209458 (a.k.a. “Osiris”) (Vidal-Madjar et al 2004) Planet is safe from evaporation!

  13. Theoretical ideas Theoretical Ideas

  14. Theoretical ideas Bryden • Tight planetary orbits • Evidence for planet migration – planets did not form where we observe them • They moved there as a result of the tidal interaction with the gaseous disk • Why did they stop? What is the parking mechanism? Rasio & Ford 1996 • Large orbital eccentricities • Possible signature of planet-planet gravitational scattering • Could have also been caused by the tidal planet-disk interaction • Resonant interaction of migrating planets We don’t really know these things very well Dynamicalpeculiarities

  15. Theoretical ideas 1 M_J planet (Lubow et a al 2003) • Mass distribution • Mass distribution arises from interplay of gas accretion and gravitational interaction of growing planet with surrounding gas disk • Formation of “gap” can probably explain the “brown dwarf desert” • Current observed overabundance of high mass planets can be purely a selection effect • Metallicity dependence • Can be accounted for assuming that giant planets form via the gas accretion onto the rocky cores • Could be a signature of stellar pollution by accreting planetary material (e.g. migrating planets which failed to hit the brake) Peculiarities of physical structure

  16. Future prospects Future Prospects

  17. Future prospects Kepler Space-based Photometer ( 0.95-m aperture ) Photometric One-Sigma Noise <2x10-5 Monitor 100,000 main-sequence stars for planets. Mission lifetime of 4 years. Launch date – October 2007 Transits of terrestrial planets: - About 50 planets if most have R ~ R_Earth, Modulation of the reflected light from giant inner planets: - About 870 planets with periods less than one week. Transits of giant planets: - About 135 inner-orbit planet detections along with albedos for about 100 of them.

  18. Future prospects SIM (Space Interferometry Mission) Precision astrometry on stars to V=20 Optical interferometer on a 10-m structure Global astrometric accuracy: 4 microarcseconds (µas) Typical observations take ~1 minute; ~ 5 million observations in 5 years Launch date - February 2010 • Search for terrestrial planets around the nearest 250 stars • (1 µas) • “Broad survey" for Neptune-size planets around 2000 stars (3 µas) • Giant planets around young stars

  19. Future prospects TPF (Terrestrial Planet Finder) Goals: - Survey nearby stars looking for terrestrial-size planets in the "habitable zone“. - Follow up brightest candidates with spectroscopy, looking for atmospheric signatures, habitability or life itself. - Will detect and characterize Earth-like planets around as many as 150 stars up to 15 pc away. Two complementary space observatories: a visible-light coronagraph and a mid-infrared formation-flying interferometer. TPF coronagraph launch is anticipated around 2014. TPF interferometer launch is anticipated before 2020.

  20. Conclusions • More than 100 planets are now known around main sequence stars and neutron stars, among them 15 multiple systems. • They are detected by 4 different methods: • - Radial velocity searches • - Pulsar timing • - Transits • - Microlensing • Most extrasolar planets exhibit unusual dynamical characteristic: small orbits and high eccentricities. • Their physical properties are similar to those of giant planets in the Solar System (Jupiter and Saturn). • In the next 10 years at least 3 space borne missions will open up new horizons in this field. More than 30 are currently underway.

More Related