240 likes | 377 Views
Planning to make a difference. Success factors in the ANNIE Project Jay Dempster FDTL Conference, Manchester 31 st Oct – 1 st Nov 2002. Session topics. About ANNIE Organisation and planning Project success factors An impact framework In-reach and Out-reach activities
E N D
Planning to make a difference Success factors in the ANNIE Project Jay Dempster FDTL Conference, Manchester 31st Oct – 1st Nov 2002
Session topics • About ANNIE • Organisation and planning • Project success factors • An impact framework • In-reach and Out-reach activities • Successful embedding by projects
About ANNIE • FDTL phase 3 • Jan 01 – Mar 03 (27 months) • Theatre & Drama • Enhance students’ learning experience by: • Access to research-led teaching • Engagement in creative & collaborative self-directed learning
Organisation • Warwick & Kent • De Montfort, Exeter, Queen’s Belfast, Lancaster, Manchester • London, Frankfurt, Vancouver, Kansas, Los Angeles • Pontypridd, Burton, Shrewsbury • 2 project directors, 1 project manager • 2 educational developers • Local and remote lecturers, expert practitioners • 16 case studies: 12 in year 1 & 4 in year 2 • ICT !
Planning activities Development Evaluation Dissemination
Project success factors • Project organisation • Project roles • Communication • Project structure • Project activities • Partnerships • Project engagement
Planning for impact • What do you feel could be done to assist the impact of projects? • By the project itself? • By senior management or other central units in your institution? • By the funding body/programme team? • By others?
An impact framework • Project operational context: • Planning for impact • identifying stakeholders • Institutional context: • In-reach activities: • informing local knowledge • Wider context: • Out-reach activities: • making things happen elsewhere
people projects support funding ILT SHEFC HEFCE NCT ESRC Socrates JISC LTSN ALT FDTL SCOTCIT Subject communities HE institutions SEDA “beyond HE ” Project operational context
partnerships communication implementation planning PROJECT TEAM L&T units IT dept Library Academic staff Department 1 Department 2 Lead institution Institutional partners Institutional context: in-reach
Consortium activities Collaborative shared roles/activities Parallel within shared framework Centralised with development led by lead institution In what ways does this influence priorities for planning your project’s activities?
partnerships communication implementation planning PROJECT TEAM L&T units IT dept Library Academic staff Department 1 Department 2 Lead institution Institutional partners ? ? ? Wider context: out-reach
Group discussion IN-REACH IN LEAD INSTITUTION OUT-REACH IN OTHER INSTITUTIONS IMPACT BEYOND DISCIPLINE & HE SECTOR
In-reach activities Top 5s
Out-reach activities Top 5s
Evaluating the impact of ANNIE • Approaches that led to good impact in the institutions • What kinds of in-reach and out-reach activities were effective • How the project is moving from innovation to embedding
Approaches that led to good impact across institutions • Project led by pedagogy not technology • Culture of support for innovation and reflection on teaching practice • IT service keen to overcome technical barriers to remote access to and from the university • Pre-existing links between tutors and student groups in partner institutions
What kinds of in-reach and out-reach activities were effective • Tutors experiencing personally the benefits to students through the new approaches that led to real changes in teaching practices • Engaging distant experts using simple technology • Students were excited by their learning experience and developed sophisticated new skills • Managing expectations – learning from failure
How the project is moving from innovation to embedding • Demonstrate how realistic the new methods are • Provide practical guidance • Capture experiences to inspire and enthuse others • Scaling up, repetition, getting braver • Word of mouth: departmental culture, the students voice
Factors experienced by national projects • Timing • “Timeliness is crucial and impacts a lot.” • Personal investment • “individual enthusiasm “ • “incredible energy and commitment of the individuals“ • “dedication and hard work despite short term nature of the funding” • Good collaborations • “willing to go and share ideas with others” • “happy for [their] materials to be used and adapted” • Champion in policy position • “People are desperately influential.” • Staff development angle • “connecting with academics” and “listening approaches” • Ability to adapt to local, emerging demands • “diversified to meet a wider audience” LTSN Generic Centre project http://www.telri.ac.uk/Transfer/ltsngc/ltsngc.htm
Successful impact • “We opened up a lot of channels of communication between institutions. And since the project has finished, that activity seems to be continuing “ • “The skills, the knowledge and everything is in the people concerned. That’s the really valuable thing.” • “not a big impact to the sector, but immense benefit to those institutions engaged in the project”
more@ annie@warwick.ac.uk http://www.ukc.ac.uk/sdfva/ANNIE/ http://www.telri.ac.uk/Transfer/ltsngc/ltsngc.htm