1 / 9

Group 4

Group 4. Digital archiving. Experience by Universities. Universities of Warsaw, Rome la Sapienza, Helsinki and Brussels

manuelp
Download Presentation

Group 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group 4 Digital archiving

  2. Experience by Universities • Universities of Warsaw, Rome la Sapienza, Helsinki and Brussels • Warsaw: all the libraries use the same software dLibra made in Poland , it makes possible for libraries to check what material has already been digitised, only the National Library use other software and makes no announcement of which material has been digitised • Priorities: special collections and students leaning materials

  3. Experiences by Universities • Helsinki thesis repository about 10 years • Nowadays 80 % from PhD thesis published on the web, MA thesis under planning • Abstracts mandatory publishing on the web • Textbook articles (about 10 years) • Research data recently • National Digital Library program by the Min of Education • Cultural heritage program by National Library • Needs of Scientific community are different

  4. Experiences by Universities • Rome: large investments during last 10 years for digital library • Committee on central level

  5. Collaboration to enhance access Group 4

  6. Non-profit collaboration • How to be sure that there will be sustainable funding for the future with growing digital collection (digital curation, access) - a threath

  7. Public/ private partnerships • Google • Ghent was first a French speaking university • Profitable for the university when getting the work and technology from Google • How the preservation has arranged, can we rely on the future access

  8. Service provision • Are the digitised collections by Google open or restricted in the future? • What kind of restrictions it will make for the future collaboration with third partners and research purposes?

  9. OA issues • The University leadership has to support or even make OA publishing mandatory on the university level • E.g. University of Helsinki will mandate scholars to publish in the OA-journals or in the institutional repository • The process of OA publishing has to be easy and rewarding for the scholars

More Related