200 likes | 310 Views
Mid Term review, Toronto, 25-27 Oct 2004. Application and assessment of Canadian air quality models in Quebec Region. Project team: Gilles Morneau Nedka Pentcheva Jeff Brook Véronique Bouchet/Louis-Philippe Crevier. Workplan.
E N D
Mid Term review, Toronto, 25-27 Oct 2004 Application and assessment of Canadian air quality models in Quebec Region Project team: Gilles Morneau Nedka Pentcheva Jeff Brook Véronique Bouchet/Louis-Philippe Crevier
Workplan • Simulations of episodes with AURAMS redone since last year after corrections of emissions data and model • 12-21 June 2001 • 29 July-4 August 2001 • CHRONOS (with hetv) runs still to be done • Analysis of GEM/AURAMS results vs measurements under way
Model configuration • GEM: • Force-restore surface scheme • Horizontal resolution of fine grid 24 km • AURAMS • Horizontal resolution of grid: 21km • Pseudo-1995 anthropogenic emissions • Biogenic emissions with CEPS dataset
Results • PM2.5 mass • 5 NAPS sites 12-21 June and 29 July-4 August 2001 • 2 STIFS sites 29 July-3 August 2001 • Carbon • 2 STIFS sites • Inorganic ions • 2 STIFS sites and CAPMoN sites
Summary • STIFS data allowed us to analyse night time models behavior • Underestimation of OC in AURAMS • EC: good order of magnitude • Underestimation of sulphate on polluted days • Too much accumulation of ammonium nitrate at night under high pressure systems near major urban centres
Next steps • CHRONOS runs for same episodes • Continue analysis with STIFS and CAPMoN data • Examine GEM, AURAMS and emission rates • Model simulations for July 2001?
Acknowledgement • NAPS data provided by Ministère de l’environnement du Québec • STIFS data provided by Jeff Brook • CAPMoN data provided by Dave MacTavish • Constant support from AQMAG at CMC