400 likes | 547 Views
Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level. Farmington High School March 9, 2012. Following Along. Wikispaces : http://fhsrti.wikispaces.com/. Welcome & Introductions. Ben Kusch, Principal Kristin Scherman, Secondary Literacy Coach Kari Simonson, Reading Specialist
E N D
Success With Response to Intervention at the High School Level Farmington High School March 9, 2012
Following Along • Wikispaces: • http://fhsrti.wikispaces.com/
Welcome & Introductions Ben Kusch, Principal Kristin Scherman, Secondary Literacy Coach Kari Simonson, Reading Specialist Sara Byers-Platt, Reading Specialist Theresa Agerter, Assistant Principal
About Us • Farmington High School • Enrollment • Demographics • Recent History
Session Overview & Goals: Response to Intervention (RtI) Theory RtI in a Secondary Literacy Context Data Collection and Progress Monitoring Role of Common Formative Assessments Role of Collaboration Role of Purposeful Adult Action and Supervision
RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”
RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”
RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”
RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”
RtI Overview • What is your current level of understanding in regards to RtI? • “I’ve heard of it, but not much else.” • “I know a little bit about it, but need to learn more” • “I am in the early implementation stages of an RtI initiative/program” • “I am actively implementing an RtI program/initiative in my organization and am curious about what others are doing”
Background Information New High Stakes Accountability Underperforming Students Lack of a Cohesive Plan Growing Concern
Planning Ahead • Literacy Interventions for Adolescent (High School) Readers • What Research Says • Use of Data • Entrance and Exit Criteria • The Necessity of “And”
Planning Ahead • 4 Main Objectives of an Effective Assessment Plan : • Screening • Progress Monitoring • Diagnosis • Evaluation
Planning Ahead • Beliefs Around Reading Intervention: • Multiple Data Measures • No Silver Bullet • Variability • Relationships
National Reading Panel Berrignger et al. 2006
What Came Next: • A Different Approach to Intervention • Variability of Need • With a Scalpel, not a Chainsaw
Class Structure: Refined 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class
Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 minutes
Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 Minutes
Mini-Lessons: Vocabulary • Root Trees • Thinking about patterns in words • Morphemes: Roots, Prefixes, Suffixes: Identifying them in words to decode and attach meaning • Word Mapping • Word Diary work These strategies give students the ability to attach meaning to unknown words without having to use a dictionary, or worse…skip the word.
Mini-Lesson: Comprehension • Active Reading Strategies • Question • Evaluate/Comment • Connect • Review/Clarify • Predict • Visualize • Respond Beers, Kylene. When Kids Can’t Read: What Teachers Can Do.Portmouth: Heinemann, 2003. Print. Literature: The Reader’s Choice. New York: Glenco/McGraw-Hill, 2002. Print
Class Structure 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class 22 minutes
Class Structure: Mini Lesson 66 Min. in addition to a regular English Class
National Reading Panel Berrignger et al. 2006
Engagement +Motivation= Success • Connecting kids to books through: fix for outline idea • Extensive classroom library • Showing book trailers • Proximity to media center • Relationships with students • Encourage students to take ownership for their test scores. • Target their areas of need: assist in ownership. • Help them realize that reading is for everyone. • Celebrate growth
Success: • Kids are reading: some outside of class • Students are passing the GRAD test • All seniors scheduled in to classes have passed the test. • Last senior to pass last year made the B honor- roll in college first semester.
Study Findings MAZE Slope Mann Whitney U, p=.27; d=.35 TOSCRF Change Mann Whitney U, p=.003*; d=.89 (M. Burns, 2011)
New/Latest Data From Kari and Sara to look at hard data and Anecdotal analysis.
Reflecting: • What’s Working • It’s Spreading • Teaching Others • Student Learning and Achievement
Reflecting : • In Progress • Entrance / Exit Criteria • Resources • Teacher / Student Scheduling • Challenges with the “And, not Or” • What’s next?
In Summary. . . . • What’s Next?: • Continued work and professional development • Tier I • Tier II • Blending of Tier II and III • Interplay of Mainstream and Special Education • Beyond Remediation • Progress Monitoring
Contact Information • Ben Kusch • bkusch@farmington.k12.mn.us • Kristin Scherman • kscherman@farmington.k12.mn.us • Kari Simonson • ksimonson@farmington.k12.mn.us • Sara Byers-Platt • sbyers@farmington.k12.mn.us • Theresa Agerter • tagerter@farmington.k12.mn.us