1 / 16

Isomer Spectroscopy of the Heaviest Elements

Isomer Spectroscopy of the Heaviest Elements. Rod Clark (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory). Outline. Motivation for studying structure of heaviest nuclei K-isomers in Z ≥100 region The Berkeley Gas-Filled Separator (BGS) Recent results: 50 Ti+ 208 Pb→ 256 Rf+2n ( σ≈ 20nb)

mardi
Download Presentation

Isomer Spectroscopy of the Heaviest Elements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Isomer Spectroscopy of the Heaviest Elements Rod Clark (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)

  2. Outline • Motivation for studying structure of heaviest nuclei • K-isomers in Z≥100 region • The Berkeley Gas-Filled Separator (BGS) • Recent results: • 50Ti+208Pb→256Rf+2n (σ≈20nb) • 48Ca+209Bi→255Lr+2n (σ≈300nb) • Heavy element spectroscopy with GRETINA+BGS • Summary

  3. Motivation • Single-particle levels → shell structure • Next major spherical gaps • Deformed gaps • Deformation and collectivity • K-isomerism • Rotational structures • Low-lying vibrations • Pairing properties • Multi-quasiparticle states • Effects on rotation • Effects on alpha decay • Effects fission decay

  4. Nature 422 896 (2006) K-Isomers in Z≥100 Nuclei RITU at JYFL FMA at ANL

  5. Conversion Electron and Gamma Spectroscopy S.K.Tandel et al., PRL 97 082502 (2006)

  6. Berkeley Gas-filled Separator  Large acceptance: 45 msr (± 9° vertical, ±4.5° horizontal)  Highest transmission ( Ni+Pb: 70%Ca+Pb: 60%Mg+U: 18% )  Large bend angle: 70°  Lowest background rates ( 40Hz/pmA20Hz/pmA100Hz/pmA )

  7. Focal Plane Detectors 16×16 strip DSSD 1mm thick, 5cm by 5cm 1) Recoil implanted in pixel of DSSD 2) Burst of conversion electrons in same pixel from isomer decay 3) Gamma-rays in coincidence with electron burst 4) Recoil decays in same pixel by alpha/fission Key idea was to tag on isomer by searching for burst of conversion electrons and using a single pixel as a calorimeter. G.D. Jones (Liverpool), NIM A 488 471 (2002).

  8. 256Rf: Z=104, N=152 50Ti+208Pb→256Rf+2n at 243 MeV (σ≈20nb), 200pnA, 6 days Electrons Gamma Rays r-e-e-f r-e-e-f

  9. >2200 t1/2=27(6)ms Kp=(7-,8-) ≈1400 17(2)ms 6- Kp=(5-) 5- ≈1120 4- 25(2)ms 3- ≈946 256 Kp=(2-) Rf 152 104 900 4+ 2+ ≈46 0+ H. B. Jeppesen et al., Submitted to PRL

  10. ~x+1400 ~x+800 19/2 x 7/2 255Lr: Z=103, N=152 48Ca+209Bi→255Lr+2n at 222 MeV (σ≈300nb), 300pnA, 4 days

  11. 247Es: Z=99, N=148 g-spectroscopy following a-decay of 255Lr→251Md→247Es

  12. Eisteinium (Z=99) Systematics Re-examined 251Md 251Md a1 a2 a g=294 g=243 g=243 g=294 0+x 247Es 247Es F.P.Hessberger et al., EPJ A 26 233 (2005) A. Chatillon et al., EPJ A 30 397 (2006)

  13. Eisteinium (Z=99) Systematics Re-examined 251Md 251Md ? a1 a2 a g=294 g=243 g=243 g=294 0+x 247Es 247Es F.P.Hessberger et al., EPJ A 26 233 (2005) A. Chatillon et al., EPJ A 30 397 (2006)

  14. Transfermium Spectroscopy with GRETINA+BGS 50Ti+208Pb→256Rf+2n σ~20 nb 25 6+→4+ Counts 2000 48Ca+208Pb→254No+2n σ~2 μb Counts Energy (keV) The best heavy element separator with the best g-ray detector system Assumptions for simulation: sTOT = 1 barn Target = 0.5 mg/cm2 Beam Current = 50 pnA eg / crystal = 0.0067 Mg = 10 → 30.3 kHz/crystal Energy (keV)

  15. Summary • New generation of spectroscopy experiments on heaviest elements • RITU at JYFL, FMA at ANL, BGS at LBNL, • GABRIELLA at Dubna, SHIP at GSI, VAMOS at GANIL+… • Decay spectroscopy at BGS able to reach Sg (Z=106) • - single-particle states • - K-isomerism • - low-lying rotational and vibrational modes • Prompt spectroscopy with GRETINA at BGS able to reach Rf (Z=104) • - rotation versus fission • - moments of inertia, alignments • - configuration assignments • Can modern microscopic theories reproduce experiment?

  16. Thanks!

More Related