BIS Dean’s Report to the Assessment Committee

1. BIS Dean’s Reportto theAssessment Committee 4/7/14

2. Program groupings • HIM • HIA • HIT • BBA • Accounting • Finance • Marketing • Management • Business Technology • Prof Accountancy • Tech • CSC • IS • CONS/CyberOps • NSA/NSec • Computer Ed • Business Ed • Game

3. Accreditation • External agencies accredit • BBA degrees • HIM degrees • Secondary Education degrees • Some programs are designated as meetings standards/requirements • CyberOps ( NSA; NSF, DHS) • Curriculum mapping, faculty credentials

4. Assessment Plans – Now • There were no significant changes made to the assessment plans • There were no major deficiencies identified by the program assessment evaluation groups

5. Assessment Plans – Next Year • All plans will be reviewed by May • Most plans will be updated • AQIP project • More direct measures • Curriculum changes • Plans need to be updated to match new programs • Exit exams need to be updated to match new curriculum

6. BBA • Assessment plan adjustments (ongoing) • Refined student learning outcomes • In-course assessment (cross section analysis) • Direct assessment measure • ETS Major Field test is used • Overall goal score was met • 2 years of improvement after significant dip; not back to those level quite yet • Wide range indicates some student may not be taking it seriously

7. BBA • Subscores provided from MFAT: Accounting, Economics, Management, Finance, Marketing • Quantitative, International, IS • Year to year variance is large due to relatively small samples • Multi-year trends are collected by the program faculty

8. BBA • Impact of curriculum changes • Bus Tech just starting, not enough grads yet • IS sub-scores are not where they should be • Faculty in that area have met and will begin to address weakness • Flipped classrooms in some upper level courses • Improved learning, engagement, and critical thinking

9. HIM • Program is quite strong • Leading the accreditation efforts in professional agencies • Assessment measures were met except : • Major Field Exam: 89% (8/9) pass rather than 90 • Above national average on certification exam: 67% (4/6) rather than 70. Only -.12 on one. • No changes

10. IS • Declining enrollment is the major issue • 14 students completed exit exam • Subscores (13 categories) show a few areas that are lower • Curriculum changes for 2013-14 • Agile Development & AdvProjMgmt • Industry input • Review curriculum

11. Bus Ed & Comp Ed • Curriculum changes to increase Gen Ed options • Program preparations for year-long student teaching in 2015 • Small number for Praxis and student teaching evaluation/assessment • No concerns or adjustments

12. Game • Full program implementation is just now producing graduates • Strategic initiative on placement • Need to develop rubrics and direct measures for: capstone projects, online portfolios, and portfolio essays

13. CSC • No significant changes to curriculum • Core now supports CSC, Game, CyberOps • Reviewing new ACM/IEEE curriculum guidelines to formalize assessment procedures • Considering CQI project • Review MFAT subscores in more detail • Impact of MS ACS

14. CONSCyberOps • Program renamed; curriculum changed • Updated courses to match accreditation • Big changes next year • Update assessment plan • Focused program • Revise exit exam

15. NSANSec • Program renamed; curriculum changed • Pulled pieces from 3 programs to remodel Network & System Administration • Big changes next year • Update assessment plan • Focused program; • Revise exit exam; will have 2 exams in transitional period

16. Thank you • Any questions or comments?

17. BIS Dean’s Reportto theAssessment Committee 3/25/13

18. Program groupings • HIM • HIA • HIT • BBA • Accounting • Finance • Marketing • Management • Business Technology • Prof Accountancy • Tech • CSC • IS • CONS • NSA • Computer Ed • Business Ed • Game

19. Accreditation • External agencies accredit • BBA degrees • HIM degrees • Secondary Education degrees • Some programs are designated as meetings standards/requirements • CONS ( NSF, DHS, NSA) • Curriculum mapping, faculty credentials

20. Assessment Plans • There were no significant changes made to the assessment plans • There were no major deficiencies identified by the program assessment evaluation groups

21. BBA • Assessment plan adjustments • Refined student learning outcomes • In-course assessment (cross section analysis) • ETS Major Field test is used • Program goals are not met • Scores were similar to previous year, down from longer term averages • Monitoring trends [ program level ] • Increase emphasis on exam • Review sessions

22. BBA • Impact of curriculum changes • Bus Tech just starting • IS sub-scores are not where they should be • Flipped classrooms in some upper level courses • Improved learning, engagement, and critical thinking

23. HIM • Program is quite strong • Leading the accreditation efforts in professional agencies • All assessment measures were met except : • Job placement: 80% rather than 85%

24. IS • Declining enrollment is the major issue • Locally developed assessment exam • Reviewed/updated each year • Scores are solid • 12 students, 73% average • Curriculum changes for 2013-14 • Review curriculum • What should the program focus on to attract students and meet employer demand

25. CSC • No significant changes to curriculum • Reviewing ABET guidelines to formalize assessment procedures • Considering CQI project • Determining if MFAT is appropriate • Impact of MS ACS

26. CONS/NSA • No significant change this year • Curriculum, assessment plans, assessment results • Big changes next year • New majors • New assessment plans

27. Thank you • Any questions or comments?

28. BIS Program Enrollment

29. BBA Program Enrollment

30. Tech Program Enrollment