1 / 17

Strategies to Evaluate the Worth of a Web Resource

Strategies to Evaluate the Worth of a Web Resource. Research Methods and Data College of Advancing Studies Brendan Rapple. The Internet provides access to thousands of millions of web sites. There is a tremendous range in the quality and worth of these web sites.

mariel
Download Presentation

Strategies to Evaluate the Worth of a Web Resource

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategies to Evaluate the Worth of a Web Resource Research Methods and Data College of Advancing Studies Brendan Rapple

  2. The Internet provides access to thousands of millions of web sites. • There is a tremendous range in the quality and worth of these web sites. • It is essential to identity some methods of evaluating their value. • Why might one web site be very useful for research purposes, whereas another site might be totally useless?

  3. As serious researchers we must carefully evaluate all data, information, writings etc. that we wish to use in our research endeavors. • However, we should be especially on guard and skeptical when dealing with material found on the Web.

  4. Authorship Who wrote the page? Position? Organizational affiliation? E-mail address? Biographical information? Does he/she seem like someone who is qualified to write on this topic? If there is no personal author, look for an agency or organization that claims responsibility for the page. If no author's name is present, ask yourself why.

  5. Domains May give hints about the producer/sponsor of the document. .edu for educational or research institutions .com for commercial enterprises or organizations .org for nonprofit organizations .net for networks .gov or government agencies .mil for military bodies

  6. N.B. If the URL is linked to a commercial Internet provider, it may indicate that the author has no official educational connections. Any advertisement on a Web page might raise a red flag.

  7. Objective Reasoning Be conscious of hidden biases Is the information in the site a fact, an opinion or propaganda? Is the information well researched? Is the language inflammatory or full of bias? Acknowledge your own personal biases – as researchers we should be impartial.

  8. Date of Publication is very Important For Web material, ask: When was the research gathered and the piece first composed? When was the site last revised and updated (look at the end of the page)? If the author provides any links, do they work, and if so, are they up-to-date? If the piece includes tables, charts, graphs, statistics, are dates provided? Up-to-date information on a time-sensitive topic is important.

  9. Content To evaluate the content of a Web source ask • Does it provide in-depth or sketchy analysis of the topic? • Are the sources predominantly primary or secondary? • How reliable is the information? • Is the author's thesis supported by the evidence? • If it’s a controversial subject, does the author acknowledge this?

  10. Does the author provide details of research methods used? • Can the reader duplicate the research methods for verification purposes? • Are there misspellings, poor composition, bad grammar? • Can you detect any prejudice or bias?

  11. Structure Is the site easy to understand and use? Do the color and background hinder readability? Is the site design so elaborate that it detracts from the actual content? Is the web site stable; can you access it whenever you want? If there are graphics, audio, video, are they good? Do they serve any real function or are they just padding or decoration? Do they slow down transmission excessively?

  12. Intended Audience Is the information too elementary or too technical? Is it appropriately targeted?

  13. Writing Style Are the main points clearly presented? Is the text easy to read, awkward, or disorganized? Is the author's argument repetitive? and so on

  14. Documentation What sort of bibliography and sources does the author provide? Does the author make full citation to other works used? For web sources, does the bibliography/works cited only contain Internet material or does the author also point to print resources?

  15. Aesthetic Considerations • Often individual preferences

  16. Evaluate these Sites • Neu-BeCalm'd: A New Beginning For Life!  http://www.iwr.com/becalmd/ • Martin Luther King Site http://martinlutherking.org/ • The True but Little Known Facts about Women and AIDS http://147.129.226.1/library/research/AIDSFACTS.htm • The Onion: America’s Finest News Source http://www.theonion.com/ • Lasik @ Home http://www.lasikathome.com/index.html [ Some examples taken from Evaluating Internet Resources: Site Examples http://keithstanger.com/evalsite.htm ]

  17. Furnetics http://www.furnetics.com/ • Computer Tan http://www.computertan.com/ • Storm Front http://www.stormfront.org/forum/ • RTY Hospital http://www.rythospital.com/2011/ • Save the Endangered Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/ [ Some examples taken from Evaluating Internet Resources: Site Examples http://keithstanger.com/evalsite.htm ]

More Related