190 likes | 200 Views
This chapter explores the scope of patent protection for Internet patents and the concept of obviousness. It also discusses the requirements for patentability, the patent application process, and the appeals process. Additionally, it delves into the process for protecting assets as trade secrets.
E N D
Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age
4.1 • 4.2 • 4.3 • Explain the scope of patent protection for Internet patents and what is meant by obviousness • Describe the requirements for patentability. • Explain the patent application and appeals process.
4.4 • Describe the process for protecting assets as trade secrets.
4.1 • Explain the scope of patent protection for Internet patents and what is meant by obviousness
4.1 • Patents • Patent defined: right to exclude others from making, using, marketing, selling, offering for sale, or importing an invention granted by the federal government to an inventor • Device must be novel, useful, and non-obvious
4.1 • Types of Infringement • Direct Infringement • Contributory Infringement • Literal Infringement • Doctrine of Equivalents: prevents parties from evading liability by making trivial changes to avoid literal language of the patent claims
4.1 • Patent Infringement Cases • Markman Hearing: Court receives evidence and arguments concerning the construction to be given to terms in a patent claim (based on case Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.) • Applicant can appeal decision of BPAI and seek judicial review with U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
4.1 • Case Study: Bid for Position, • LLC v. AOL, LLC • Google’s AdWords: ads displayed along with search results when someone searches Google using certain keywords • Appeals Court held that Google’s AdWords did not infringe on Bid for Position’s patent for “Online Auction Bid Management System and Method”
4.2 • Describe the requirements for patentability.
4.2 • Novelty Requirement for Patentability • Invention must have occurred before anticipation by prior art or reference • Prior art: knowledge, usage, patents, and descriptions relating to an invention in existence before the invention
4.2 • First o Invent Doctrine • Patent ownership based on “first to invent” rather than “first to file” a patent application • “interference: administrative proceeding in the USPTO to determine who is entitled to the patent when two or more applicants claim the same invention
4.3 • Explain the patent application and appeals process
4.3 • Patent Application • Patent prosecution: process of applying for a patent with USPTO and negotiating with the patent examiner • Patent agent: specialized legal professional • Not necessarily a licensed lawyer • Who prepares and prosecutes patent applications before the USPTO
4.4 • Describe the process for protecting assets as trade secrets.
4.4 • Trade Secrets • Trade Secret: formula, process, device, or other business information that is kept confidential to maintain an advantage over competitors • Governed by state law – Uniform Trade Secrets Act ( UTSA)
4.4 • Protecting Trade Secrets • Owner must take reasonable precautions to protect the secret • Examples: firewalls, user monitoring, encryption, confidentiality agreements
4.1 • 4.2 • 4.3 • Explain the scope of patent protection for Internet patents and what is meant by obviousness • Describe the requirements for patentability. • Explain the patent application and appeals process.
4.4 • Describe the process for protecting assets as trade secrets.