120 likes | 317 Views
SDM 2012 Student Paper Awards. Rob Taylor Structures TC Meeting 4/9/2013. Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements). Student papers can be scheduled throughout the entire week of the conference (M - Th ).
E N D
SDM 2012 Student Paper Awards Rob Taylor Structures TC Meeting 4/9/2013
Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements) • Student papers can be scheduled throughout the entire week of the conference (M - Th). • First round of the contest will be based on the manuscripts. All the student paper manuscripts will be evaluated using predetermined criteria to be provided by Student Paper Chair to a panel of judges representing all the TCs and co-located conferences. • This review of the manuscripts will be the responsibility of the panel of judges and will be coordinated by Student Paper Chair. • Based on the manuscript ratings for all the student manuscripts, the Student Paper Chair will down select the Top 6 manuscripts for the second round of the contest. • The second round of the contest will consist of judging the actual presentations of the students. The Student Paper Chair will provide the judging criteria. • The Student Paper Chair will assemble a panel of judges for the Top 6 paper presentations. • Top 6 student papers will be judged in a special evening (recommended Tuesday, but could be Sunday or Monday, to the discretion of the SDM Organizing Committee) judging session. This session is expected to run for 3.5 – 4 hours.
Student Awards Process for SDM (Long Range Planning Requirements) • The SDM Student Paper Chair is only responsible for selecting the Jefferson Goblet and the American Society for Composite (ASC) student paper award winners. • The 6 finalists based on manuscripts will include at least 2 composite material or composite structures related papers. • The highest ranked paper based on manuscript and presentation will receive the Jefferson Goblet Award. • The highest ranked composite related paper will receive the ASC student paper award. If the Jefferson Goblet award is given to a composite related paper, the second ranked composite related paper will receive the ASC award. • The names of the Jefferson Goblet and ASC awardees will be shared with the Structures TC. The Structures TC will be responsible for selecting the Lockheed Martin and Hilton award winners. The winners of the Jefferson Goblet and ASC awards will be excluded from receiving the Structures TC sponsored student paper awards.
Manuscript Reviews • 96 student manuscripts uploaded • 13 Structures papers • Very tight schedule—submission deadline March 19 to review deadline March 27 • Structures TC reviewers—very prompt (Thank you!!!) • 20 reviewers • 2 reviews each • Subcommittee organization very helpful in completing process Mike Hyer Mary Roybal Marc Schultz Moshe Domb Mike Ross Michael Wolff JohanneHeald John Wang Mark Sensmeier ShyamaKumari PravinAggarwal Brett Anderson Stephen Clay Harry Hilton Ashok Joshi Ali Najafi Jeff Umland OlesyaZhupanska John Zipay
Finalists • 8 students invited to present at Tuesday evening judging session • 6 Finalists Eligible for Jefferson Goblet—good diversity: 1 each from • Structures (composites) • Gossamer • Materials (composites) • Structural Dynamics (composites) • MDO • Survivability • 3 composites papers in 6 finalists eligible for ASC (Amer. Soc. Comp.) award • Next 2 Structures manuscripts eligible for Structures TC awards but not Jefferson Goblet or ASC award Judges Thank you!!! Mike Hyer Mary Roybal OlesyaZhupanska John Zipay Stephanie Termaath
Observations and Recommendations • Decouple Structures awards from conference-wide awards after manuscript review and scoring • No requirement for Tuesday evening session for Structures papers • Schedule Structures student papers during Monday and Tuesday sessions • Send reviewers to presentations in regular sessions • Personal Opinion: Tuesday evening judging session is very difficult to manage, conflicts with all TC meetings, and is unfair to students • Need more than 6 finalists to be fair • LRP should revise process • Subcommittee organization is very helpful • Other TC’s not prepared for student paper reviews
Time Line for Student Paper Competition • 24 Aug – Student Paper Chair Sends draft judging criteria to SDM planning committee • 7 Sep - SDM planning committee finalizes judging criteria • 15 Oct – Chairs provide list of all student papers to SDM Student Paper Chair. • 25 Oct – Send manuscript judging criteria to authors. • 10 Jan – Contact TC reps and conference chairs for list of manuscript reviewers. • 28 Feb – Manuscript reviewer assignments complete. • 1 Mar - Send oral presentation judging criteria to authors. • 7 Mar - Contact TC reps and conference chairs for list of presentation reviewers. • 30 Mar – Notify students that have not submitted manuscript that they have until 2 Apr to submit manuscript. • 2 Apr – Student manuscript deadline • 3 Apr – Contact delinquent students to inform them that their paper has been withdrawn from student competition. • 9 Apr - Manuscript reviews complete, TC/conference reps give rankings to student papers chair • 11 Apr - Telecon to downselect 6 finalists • 12 APR – Student papers chair notifies all students of status • Apr 24 - Student presentation session at SDM Conference