1 / 49

District Indicator Report 2004-2005

District Indicator Report 2004-2005. Lexington County School District One December 2005. Accountability Overview. Report Card Results Excellent Absolute Rating Good Improvement Rating Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under federal No Child Left Behind legislation District Met AYP. 38.2%.

marsha
Download Presentation

District Indicator Report 2004-2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. District Indicator Report2004-2005 Lexington County School District One December 2005

  2. Accountability Overview • Report Card Results • Excellent Absolute Rating • Good Improvement Rating • Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under federal No Child Left Behind legislation • District Met AYP

  3. 38.2% 36.7% Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Criteria for PACT Grades were raised in 2004 and in 2005. Adjusted computations add one SEM. Attendance 95.3% Percent Tested for all demographic groups 95% Proficient or better in ELA 17.6% Proficient or better in Math 15.5%

  4. Must be met by all subgroups of 40 members for most categories and of 50 members for students with limited English proficiency or disabilities

  5. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Criteria for High Schools through 2004-2005 AYP allows addition of one SEM Graduation Increased % or 88.3% Percent Tested for all demographic groups 95% Proficient or better in ELA 33.3% Proficient or better in Math 30.0%

  6. SC Report Card Criteria Raising the bar for all schools

  7. & change district criteria Phase in Science & Social Studies Add Graduation Rate HSAP for BSAP Graduation Rate

  8. Excellent & change district criteria Phase in Science & Social Studies Add Graduation Rate HSAP for BSAP Graduation Rate Good Average

  9. Report card criteria for Improvement Ratings remain the same. • Excellent 0.4 or greater • Good 0.3 • Average 0.1 to 0.2 • Below Average 0.0 • Unsatisfactory -0.1 or less

  10. Reporting improvement at the top of the range…. Excellent Absolute Rating X 2 years Improvement Rating of Unsatisfactory is reported as Good.

  11. 2004-2005 35 objectives Compliance Index 100% 11 schools met AYP 9 did not Lowest school Compliance Index 60% 2003-200433 objectivesCompliance Index 100%15 schools met AYP5 did not Lowest school Compliance Index 86%

  12. Lexington 1 40.3 York 2 (Clover) 40.1

  13. ‘

  14. Comparing years…

  15. 1 2 3 4

  16. Reversed

  17. 94.4% highly qualified

  18. In summary • Lexington One has challenges • Accountability system demands improvement. • Population continues to grow. • Lexington One has excellent schools that enjoy community support.

More Related