1 / 23

NATO MEMBERSHIP HU LESSONS LEARNED NATO INTEGRATION

Learn about Hungary's journey towards NATO membership, achievements, challenges, integration program, and current status of military integration efforts with relevant strategies and objectives.

martingrant
Download Presentation

NATO MEMBERSHIP HU LESSONS LEARNED NATO INTEGRATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATO MEMBERSHIPHU LESSONS LEARNEDNATO INTEGRATION

  2. AGENDA • Achievements prior to NATO membership • Military integration into NATO • Problems and shortfalls • Achievements • Current status of Integration • Hungarian Integration Program • Structure, reports and tracking • Initial steps • Identification of requirements.

  3. ACHIEVEMENTSPRIORTOMEMBERSHIP(1995-1999) Elimination of the „mass army” • Reduction of authorization from over more than 100.000 • The effects of CFE agreement • Changed political environment Establishment of new force development system • Development of a long-term concept (FORCE 2013) • Establishment of a modern force planning system • Integration into the NATO force planning system (DPQ, TFG) Implementation of the minimum military requirements • Integration of the air defense into NATINADS • INFOSEC • Assignment of personnel to NATO posts • Preparation of assigned forces

  4. GE K K MNB-N Hungary 1,071Km PODUJEVO Budapest K.MITROVICA F VUCITRN F MNB-C ISB Kaposvar PRISTINA Taszar Slovenia PEC KLINA Zagreb DECANE O O 350Km GNJILANE MALISEVO Croatia Belgrade STIMLJE ORAHOVAC UROSEVAC DAKOVICA SUVA REKA Tuzla MNB-W Bosnia and Herzegovina PRIZREN R D.JANKOVIC Serbia P Sarajevo Montenegro Hungarian MSU Contingent Guard and Security Battalion MNB-E MNB-S Use of infrastructure and airspace (HNS) HUNGARIANPARTICIPATIONINSFOR/KFOR Hungarian ENG Contingent

  5. MILITARYINTEGRATIONINTONATO A F S O U T H JC SOUTH Land Forces integration KOSOVO Logistics DEDICATED PHALANX 2005 Tranformation of HDF Education & Training AIRSOUTH Air Force integration

  6. SLOW EXECUTION– REASONS FOR FAILURE • Structure and not capability-oriented restructuring; • Slow garrison closure, reallocation and disposition of excess materials; • Inadequate material-technical conditions; • Lack of necessary resources; • Maintenance problems; • Objective, resource mismatch.

  7. NEW INITIATIVE INNATOINTEGRATION The Government’s defense initiative includes: • transition to a professional force; • the earliest possible execution of NATO military integration; • identification of requirements; • Defense Review; • technical modernization and development.

  8. OBJECTIVE OF MILITARY INTEGRATION The objective of military integration to NATO is toachieve interoperability by 2010. Follow accepted MATO procedures NATO doctrines and standards, in order to develop an effective and real cooperation with other members of the Alliance in various NATO operations.

  9. THEENDSTATE • The HDF will have interoperability of declared forces with NATO. • HU will have complete integration into the NCS and all relevant planning procedures. • Hungary will have adequate resources, infrastructure capability, Host Nation Support (HNS) and various National Support Elements to conduct and support NATO military operations.

  10. AREAS OF INTEGRATION AFSOUTH – Integration Affirmation Program: Training & Courses Education Exercises Defense & Force Planning

  11. PROBLEMS AND SHORTFALLS • NATO documentation is not available for users; • Lack of identification of certain NATO requirements; • Access to NATO documents is often denied • (security clearances); • English language skills are not IAW requirements • STANAG 6001; • The ‘Train the Trainer’ Program has failed; • Procedures with STANAGs • (approval, ratification, introduction, implementation). A New INTEGRATION PROGRAM of Hungarian MOD should be developed.

  12. OBJECTIVES OF INTEGRATION • Land Forces: • Capability to participate in national or/and NATO led operations (preparation and readiness of staffs and units) • Air Force: • Effective participation in the control of the Integrated Extended Airspace , and preparation and readiness for land operations support • Logistics: • National Support Element and Host Nation Support • Education and Training: • Education and training system which meet requirements of professional armed forces

  13. CURRENT STATUS Identification of required capabilities and relevant milestones PHASE 1 Preparation of specific national and NATO plans PHASE 2 PHASE 3 Plan implementation 1st phase until 2005 Full integration 2010 PHASE 4 Assessment, modification and redesigning

  14. HU INTEGRATIONPROGRAM • Contribute to the accomplishment of integration tasks; • Identify the requirements for interoperability; • Define the achievements and shortfalls; • Monitor the implementation of requirements; • Provide flexibility; • Provide timeline and deadlines.

  15. STRATEGY OF IMPLEMENTATION Accomplishment of commitments • Aim: • Procedure: • Action: • Adaptation of doctrines, procedures; • Their introduction into education, training and their use in exercises • Acquisitions of necessary assets; • Equipping with technical assets. Training and Exercises: J3 DS MOD Education: Education & Science Dept. MOD Force Planning: J5 DS MOD

  16. STRUCTURE OF INTEGRATION PROGRAM • Principles of Integration – Conditions for accomplishment • General evaluation • Tasks for interoperability • Strategy of implementation • Special requirements for Land, Air and Logistics • Timeline • Tasks for successful accomplishment of DEDICATED PHALANX • Task list • Tasks – responsible authority - deadlines

  17. REPORTS AND TRACKING SYSTEM • Current situation • Detailed tasks and deadlines • Analysis and Evaluation • accomplishment – differences - alternates • Decisions • Reports • Status of accomplishments, evaluation • 3 Month Report • Information to AFSOUTH • Annual Report

  18. IDENTIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS Identification of requirements is essential to accomplish the integration. A special temporary Working Group has been established to carry out this task. STANAGs Allied Publications (APs) MC, Bi-MNC, Bi-SC documents ACEdirectives

  19. WORKINGGROUP ACTIVITY Review of each document Update of Force Development Registers Requirements ? Distribution of documents to relevant units Identification of specific requirements Designation of responsible organization(s) for processing

  20. TIMELINE AFS, STANAG requirements OPEVAL /TACEVAL 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 (A) Current situation (B) Planned (C) No plan FORCE DEVELOPMENT REGISTERS Evaluation of current situation 10% 30% ? 60% Contribution

  21. ACHIVEMENT OF INTEROPERABILITY Equipping with assets Units Procurements Assessment of requirements Registers Influencingfactors (e.g.: DEDICATED PHALANX) Budget planning Costing Resource planning Priorities (decisions)

  22. MAJOR MILESTONES • Identification of requirements (Working Group) 31 July 03 • Update of Force Development Registers 31 August 03 • Tailoring of educational requirements 01 September 03 • Establishment of new training systemDecember 03 • Initial Planning Conference of DEDICATED PHALANX ’05 January 04 • Implementation of DEDICATED PHALANX ’05June-July 05 • Education of NATO compatible syllabus since01 September 05

  23. Thank you for your attention! AnyQuestions?

More Related