1 / 36

Love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation.

Hypothesis tests for the regression coefficients in survival analysis, including global and local tests. Estimation of survival function and median survival time. Assessment of model adequacy using Cox-Snell, Martingale, and Deviance residuals. Assessing the proportional hazards assumption.

martinterry
Download Presentation

Love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation.

  2. Survival Analysis Semiparametric Proportional Hazards Regression (Part III)

  3. Hypothesis Tests for the Regression Coefficients • Does the entire set of variables contribute significantly to the prediction of survivorship? (global test) • Does the addition of a group variables contribute significantly to the prediction of survivorship over and above that achieved by other variables? (local test)

  4. Three Tests They are all likelihood-based tests: • Likelihood Ratio (LR) Test • Wald Test • Score Test

  5. Three Tests • Asymptotically equivalent • Approximately low-order Taylor series expansion of each other • LR test considered most reliable and Wald test the least

  6. Global Tests • Overall test for a model containing p covariates • H0: b1 = b2 = ... = bp = 0

  7. Global Tests

  8. Global Tests

  9. Local Tests • Tests for the additional contribution of a group of covariates • Suppose X1,…,Xp are included in the model already and Xp+1,…,Xq are yet included

  10. Local Tests

  11. Local Tests • Only one: likelihood ratio test • The statistics -2logPLn(MPLE) is a measure of “amount” of collected information; the smaller the better. • It sometimes inappropriately referred to as a deviance; it does not measure deviation from the saturated model (the model which is prefect fit to the data)

  12. Example: PBC • Consider the following models: LR test stat = 2.027; DF = 2; p-value =0.3630  conclusion?

  13. Estimation of Survival Function • To estimate S(y|X), the baseline survival function S0(y) must be estimated first. • Two estimates: • Breslow estimate • Kalbfleisch-Prentice estimate

  14. Breslow Estimate

  15. Kalbfleisch-Prentice Estimate • An estimate of h0(y) was derived by Kalbfleisch and Prentice using an approach based on the method of maximum likelihood. • Reference: Kalbfleisc, J.D. and Prentice, R.L. (1973). Marginal likelihoods based on Cox’s regression and life model. Biometrika, 60, 267-278

  16. Example: PBC

  17. Estimation of the Median Survival Time

  18. Example: PBC • The estimated median survival time for 60-year-old males treated with DPCA is 2105 days (=5.76 years) with an approximate 95% C. I. (970.86,3239.14). • The estimated median survival time for 40-year-old males treated with DPCA is 3584 days (=9.81 years) with an approximate 95% C. I. (2492.109, 4675.891).

  19. Assessment of Model Adequacy • Model-based inferences depend completely on the fitted statistical model  validity of these inferences depends on the adequacy of the model • The evaluation of model adequacy are often based on quantities known as residuals

  20. Residuals for Cox Models • Three major residuals: • Cox-Snell residuals (to check for overall fit) • Martingale residuals (to identify functional forms and assess PH assumption) • Deviance residuals (to identify outliers)

  21. Cox-Snell Residuals

  22. Limitations • Do not indicate the type of departure when the plot is not linear. • Do not take into account (heaving) censoring. • The exponential distribution for the residuals holds only when the actual parameter values are used. • Crowley & Storer (1983, JASA 78, 277-281) showed empirically that the plot is ineffective at assessing overall model adequacy; can only identify a very poor fit.

  23. Martingale Residuals Martingale residuals are a transformation of Cox-Snell residuals.

  24. Martingale Residuals • Martingale residuals are useful for exploring the correct functional form for the effect of a covariate. • Example: PBC

  25. Martingale Residuals • Fit a full (or final) model. • Plot the martingale residuals against each ordinal covariate separately. • Superimpose a scatterplot smooth (such as LOESS) to see the functional form for the covariate.

  26. Martingale Residuals • Example: PBC The covariates are now modified to be: Age, log(bili), and other categorical variables. • The simple method may fail when covariates are correlated.

  27. Deviance Residuals • Martingale residuals are a transformation of Cox-Snell residuals • Deviance residuals are a transformation of martingale residuals.

  28. Deviance Residuals • Deviance residuals can be used like residuals from OLS regression: They follow approximately the standard normal distribution when censoring is light (<25%) • Can help to identify outliers (subjects with poor fit): • Large positive value  died too soon • Large negative value  lived too long

  29. Example: PBC

  30. Assessing the Proportional Hazards Assumption • By empirical score process/simulations • In SAS: add a statement ASSESS PH/ RESAMPLE; • A p-value will be given to assess the significance level of deviation from the proportional hazards assumption

  31. Strategies for Non-proportionality • Stratify the covariates with non-proportional effects • No test for the effect of a stratification factor (so only for nuisance covariates) • How to categorize a numerical covariate? • Partition the time axis • Add a time-dependent covariate • Use a different model (such as AFT model)

More Related