250 likes | 401 Views
Impacts of leaf phenology and water table on interannual variability of carbon fluxes in subboreal uplands and wetlands. Implications for regional fluxes in the upper Midwest USA. Ankur R Desai, Benjamin N Sulman University of Wisconsin-Madison D. Scott Mackay
E N D
Impacts of leaf phenology and water table on interannual variability of carbon fluxes in subboreal uplands and wetlands Implications for regional fluxes in the upper Midwest USA Ankur R Desai, Benjamin N Sulman University of Wisconsin-Madison D. Scott Mackay State University of New York-Buffalo Ameriflux/ChEAS PIs Ameriflux Meeting 2008
Motivation • Interannual variation (IAV) in carbon fluxes from land to atmosphere is significant at most flux sites • Key to understanding how climate affects ecosystems comes from modeling IAV • IAV (years-decade) is currently poorly modeled, while hourly, seasonal, and even successional (century) are better
Climate Drivers of Carbon Flux • Temperature • Precipitation • Radiation • [CO2]
Interannual ^ Climate Drivers of Carbon Flux • Temperature -> Phenology • Precipitation -> Drought • Radiation -> Light Quality • [CO2] -> Acclimation
Questions • What controls IAV of NEE in subboreal uplands? • Hypothesis: Phenology -> Growing season start, end, or length affects GPP • Piao et al (2008) -> Autumn warming and Rh • What controls IAV of NEE in subboreal wetlands? • Hypothesis: Phenology + Water table affects ER • Ise et al (2008) -> Decomposition and moisture • What controls IAV of regional NEE in subboreal North America? • Can a very simple model be constructed to explain IAV? • Can we make do a parameter opimization more attuned to IAV? • Hypothesis: MCMC overfits to hourly data
Optimization HOURLY IAV
Phenology • Five sites with 5-8 years of data • 1 regional (LEF), 1 wetland (LCR), 3 uplands (SYL, UMB, WCR) • Assimilate 1st 4 years of data
Phenology Model • Twice daily model, annually resetting pools • Driven by PAR, Air and Soil T, VPD • LUE based GPP model f(PAR,T,VPD) • Three respiration pools f(Air T, Soil T, GPP) • Model 1. NOLEAF • Constant leaf on and leaf off days • Model 2. LEAF (Phenology) • Sigmoidal Threshold GDD (base 10) function for leaf on • Sigmoidal Threshold Daily Mean Soil Temp function for leaf off • 17 parameters, 3 are fixed • Output: NEE, ER, GPP, LAI
Hourly HOURLY NOLEAF HOURLY LEAF IAV NOLEAF IAV LEAF
Interannual HOURLY NOLEAF HOURLY LEAF IAV NOLEAF IAV LEAF
Precipitation and Water Table • Sulman et al (in prep) Biogeosciences - see Ameriflux poster
Regional NEE • See NACP poster in Feb.
Conclusions • Autumn soil temperature appears to be a major control on interannual variability in subboreal upper Midwest USA flux tower site annual NEE • Due mainly to effect of growing season length for GPP • Only detectable using a modified MCMC cost function that penalizes for poor fit to cumulative annual NEE • Additionally, growing season average water table strongly affects ER in wetlands • GPP effect in both uplands and wetlands -> related to precipitation deficits? • Regional NEE is messy • Thanks: DOE NICCR, DOE TCP, NASA CC, NOAA CPO, USDA/USFS NRS, NSF, UW Foundation, ChEAS