70 likes | 90 Views
Learn about the development process and key features of the updated regulations for environmental impact assessments, aimed at reducing delays and improving decision-making.
E N D
Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, as amended Presentation to the Portfolio and Select Committees, 17 May 2005
The Need For New Regulations • The current regulations are only transitional • A “one-size-fits-all” approach is followed • The current processes are too cumbersome • Too many applications are dealt with through exemptions • The current regulations places a high administrative load on officials • The current process does not always ensure that adequate information for decision-making is submitted • The current list of activities is outdated and inflexible • There are concerns that the current regulations cause unnecessary delays for development
The Consultative Development Process • Initial drafting stages involved numerous interactions with provinces • First draft published on 25 June 2004 for initial comment (60 days) - ± 140 institutions / individuals submitted comments • Comments were taken into account, comments and response report drafted and made available • Workshop with provinces • Cabinet approval on 1 December 2004 • 2nd draft published on 14 January 2005 (30 days) - ± 70 institutions / individuals submitted comments • Meeting with key critics • Presentation to NEDLAC on 20 April 2005
Key Features of the New Regulations • A mechanism for quick assessment of most applications (screening) • Reduces the number of interactions required between the applicant and the competent authority • More sensitive and flexible listing of activities • Different entry points for various activities • Provision for stricter application of regulations in sensitive areas • Specified report content to facilitate improved quality of reports and decision-making • Provision for Environmental Management Frameworks • Provision for the recovery of costs
The Key Differences • Provision for screening provides a streamlined process • “Class reports” provides for further streamlining • Linked developments may be authorized together • Draft EMP required as part of EIR • Report contents specified in more detail • Provision for transfers / amendments to authorizations • Provision for timeframes • Clarification regarding independence of EAP • A better specified list of activities
The Way Forward • Final edit • Submission to DG and Minister for approval • State Law Advisor Review • Translation • Publication