1 / 15

SU-8 Testing (v1b)

SU-8 Testing (v1b). Thin SU8 on glass slide Test Soft Bake (SB) and Post Exposure Bake (PEB). “Control” Recipe. Spin Coating: 10s @ 500rpm; 30s @ 2000rpm (expected thickness?) Soft Bake (SB): 60s @ 93°C Exposure: 8s @ 275 W PEB: 60s @ 93°C Develop: 4min in SU8 developer

marycraig
Download Presentation

SU-8 Testing (v1b)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SU-8 Testing (v1b) • Thin SU8 on glass slide • Test Soft Bake (SB) and Post Exposure Bake (PEB)

  2. “Control” Recipe • Spin Coating: 10s @ 500rpm; 30s @ 2000rpm • (expected thickness?) • Soft Bake (SB): 60s @ 93°C • Exposure: 8s @ 275 W • PEB: 60s @ 93°C • Develop: 4min in SU8 developer • SU8 developer rinse • IPA rinse/Nitrogen Dry

  3. 1st Set of Tests • 4 samples; 8 devices/sample • 4 Wells (W)+4 Blanks (B)/sample • S1: “Control”: Misaligned (Top contacts don’t fully overlap guide circles on bottom. This could result in the top contact not covering the well); All shorted; R(W) ~8.6Ω; R(B)~10Ω • Test Parameters: • SB (RT Evap for 30min) and Vary PEB time @ 60°C? • S2: 8min PEB: R(W)=(2.7±0.8)Ω; R(B)=11MΩ±0; C(B) = 15 ±.1 pF • S3: 13min PEB: R(W)=(4.9±?)Ω; R(B=(5.6±7.7)MΩ; C(B)=17 ±.5? • S4: 15min PEB: R(W)=(3.8±1)Ω; R(B)=(11±0)MΩ; C(B)=? ±? • Cracking patterns seen in S2, S3, S4

  4. 2nd set of test samples Summary • 4 samples • 2 “Controls” • Test Parameters: • 1 min PEB @ 93°C and Vary SB time @ 60°C • SB: 2.5 min • SB: 5 min

  5. 2nd Test Results“Control 1” S5 Summary: W: 4/4 Shorted B: 3/4 Shorted R(Well): (12.1 ± 10) Ω Excluding #3 R(Blank): (158± 230) Ω Blank Capacitance: 9.38 pF

  6. “Control 2” S6 Summary: W: 2/4 Shorted (2 Damaged by applying too high a voltage) B: 0/4 Shorted R(Well): (94± 68) Ω; C(Blank): (9.57± 0.5) pF

  7. 2.5min SB S7 Summary: All Shorted R(Blank): 184.8± 211Ω R(Well): 8± 4.9Ω

  8. 5min SB S8 Summary: W: 3/4 Shorted (why not 4/4?) B: 3/4 Shorted R(Blank): (30± 20)Ω (#8 excluded) R(Well): (3.7± 1.6) Ω 7*: Remeasured and same effect ignored in the average. Strange that there is a Capacitance and low Resistance, Remeasured C and still high

  9. “Control 2” 20x

  10. “Control 2” 100x

  11. “Control1” 100x

  12. 2.5min SB 100x

  13. 5min SB 100x

  14. S9 • Back Contact Broken no Resistances • Measured Capacitances • W: 2/4 Shorted B: 1/4 Shorted • Avg Capacitance Well: 19.3± 0.6pF

  15. S10 Summary: W: 4/4 Shorted B: 4/4 Shorted Avg Well Resistance: 5.0± 1.2Ω Avg Blank Resistance: 96± 52Ω Double Exposed (16s)

More Related