150 likes | 180 Views
Delve into the cultural divide between liberals and conservatives in American politics through Lakoff's argument, analyzing how unconscious value systems underlie political rhetoric. Explore differing priorities such as infrastructure, defense, education, and more, and consider how contrasting views shape policy decisions. Learn about the metaphorical "family" models of government and society proposed by Lakoff, which reflect distinct moral views and influence stances on issues like welfare, the environment, and more. Discover how these metaphors impact political communication and policy-making, shedding light on effective messaging strategies.
E N D
Announcements • No class Friday (reminder) • May 5: Minnesota • May 8: Ohio • May 10: Pennsylvania • May 12: Rhode Island
Shared American values • Freedom/liberty • Equality • Individualism • Free enterprise/laissez-faire economics • American dream/opportunity
Different priorities • Infrastructure • Defense • Education • Scientific research • Prisons • Aid to the disadvantaged
Is there a cultural divide between liberals and conservatives?
“Do you think there is too much, too little, or about the right amount of government regulation and involvement in the area of environmental protection?” The Harris Poll, August 9-16, 2005, N=1,217 adults nationwide, MoE+/-3.
Which punishment do you prefer for people convicted of murder: the death penalty or life in prison with no chance of parole?" Quinnipiac University Poll. Dec. 7-12, 2004. N=1,529 registered voters nationwide.
Lakoff’s argument • A cognitive linguist • Argument: Unconscious value systems underlie the way liberals and conservatives talk about politics. • Society is a family • Government is a parent
Questions about Lakoff’s argument: • Do you recognize the two models of family? Does your family resemble one of the two?
Questions about Lakoff’s argument • What is considered moral by the conservative worldview? • What is considered moral by the liberal worldview? • Do the values embodied by the two “family” metaphors for government and society ring true to you (especially the liberal one if you’re liberal, & vice versa)?
Questions about Lakoff’s argument • Based on Lakoff’s argument, why do liberals and conservatives have the positions they do on: • Welfare • The environment • Gay marriage • The death penalty • Can these metaphors tell us about how liberal and conservative values produce different policy statements about taxes, immigration, etc.?
Can Lakoff’s analysis help us understand why some messages are especially effective? • Willie Horton • Compassionate Conservative • Helping Americans who “work hard and play by the rules”
Liberals Children develop best through positive relationships Children become self-reliant by being respected Children obey because they love and respect parent All legitimate authority serves the cause of nurturance Conservatives Children are competent to make own decisions and can sink or swim Children need to learn self-discipline to deal with a harsh world Children learn through fair punishment Parents don’t meddle with adult children The two family models