140 likes | 280 Views
Extracting model parameters - are our techniques fit for the job?. Patrick Meade Institute for Advanced Study. Outline. Number of ways to extract data from models have been/are being developed (more in Dirk’s talk) Are these techniques robust? What models do we actually care about?
E N D
Extracting model parameters - are our techniques fit for the job? Patrick Meade Institute for Advanced Study
Outline • Number of ways to extract data from models have been/are being developed (more in Dirk’s talk) • Are these techniques robust? • What models do we actually care about? • Models that have a point – can in principle talk about extracting parameters • Old Standards (with some new twists perhaps) • Newly Needed Ones • Models that don’t (at least from theory point of view) • How quickly adaptable are the techniques for new models?
Models that we care about? Murayama How do we decide which to “fit”?
Trends in Theory Possibilities for the LHC NOTE: THEY MAY ALL BE BAD CHOICES! Disclaimer: Candidates are not representative of models or authors of said models
Motivated Models – Old School • SUSY • Strong Dynamics • Extra dimensions • Techni… • Little Higgs • ...
Fitting easy because motivated models have few parameters and distinct signatures? AMSB+common scalar mass Gauge Mediation MSUGRA
Fitting easy because motivated models have few parameters and distinct signatures? Gauge Mediation General Gauge Mediation 6 Numbers
General Gauge Mediation Arbitrary Gaugino Masses
Other Models? As model builders we have a lot of ways out so make sure techniques for fitting are adaptive
New Models? • How do we think about fitting when new physics pops up? • Effective lagrangians/Models • Again we need to be adaptive!
“Un”motivated Models • How do we characterize them? • Effective lagrangians / form factors? • Leftover questions from Matt’s talk yesterday?
Thanks to the Organizers!(that came!) • Thanks especially to Tilman! • Graham has your present but forgot to wrap it, you’ll get it at lunch