130 likes | 1.26k Views
Process for Nomination to the Supreme Court. Presidential Advisors make a list of potential Candidates.After several background checks and a recommendation from the committee on the judiciary, a vote is sent to the senate floor.If the nominee gets the majority, they are appointed to the Supreme Co
E N D
1. Gabriel Becker
Lauren Gerber The Tensions of Judicial Appointment
2. Process for Nomination to the Supreme Court Presidential Advisors make a list of potential Candidates.
After several background checks and a recommendation from the committee on the judiciary, a vote is sent to the senate floor.
If the nominee gets the majority, they are appointed to the Supreme Court.
3. Good Behavior A Supreme Court Justice serves a life appointment during good behavior
Good Behavior is a lower standard than is required for officials in the executive branch
This potentially long term is the reason the appointment process is so arduous.
4. Borked A term that arose after the Senate refused to nominate Ronald Reagans recommended candidate, Robert Bork, to the Supreme Court.
Ted Kennedy conducted hearings that lasted twelve days, and produced a report that was over 6,000 pages long.
Ultimately, Bork was rejected for nomination, and Anthony Kennedy was voted in.
Borked now means
a coordinated attack against a nominee to prevent his or her approval by the senate.
5. Nuclear Option The senate can use the Filibuster to stall the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice.
This has only been attempted a handful of times in history, and has worked even fewer times.
The Nuclear Option was a proposal that suggested changing senate filibuster rules by allowing a simple majority of the Senate to vote on the approval of judicial nominees
6. Process for Nomination to the Circuit Court of Appeals The main difference is that in actuality, the Senate appoints and the President confirms.
Senatorial Courtesy: a senator from the Presidents party submits a list of names to the presidents staff for consideration
7. Sample FRQ The confirmation of Supreme Court justices is often a contentious process. In your essay, do the following:
A) Define what is meant by the advice and consent of the United States Senate.
B) Discuss two of the following and their relationship to the debates regarding judicial appointments:
i. original intent
ii. Borked
iii. Roe v. Wade
C) Explain how judicial terms of good behavior might affect the confirmation process.
8. Advice and consent of the United States Senate This is a constitutional phrase that gives the Senate the power to confirm or reject judicial and major executive appointments and the power to ratify or reject treaties
9. Original Intent This is a judicial philosophy that suggests the power of the Supreme Court is limited to what the founders originally meant when they wrote the Constitution
This is considered a very conservative view
A candidate with an original intent philosophy would likely have a difficult time making it through a Democratically controlled Congress
10. Borked Comes from the rejected nomination of Robert Bork (who believed in Original Intent)
Suggests that the judicial confirmation process is hyper-political
Candidates might be rejected if they get caught in the middle of a political conflict in Senate
11. Roe v. Wade Famous Supreme Court case involving abortion
Since its decision, its been used as a test for Supreme Court candidates
Those who support Roe are seen as liberal
Those who oppose Roe are viewed as more conservative
12. Good Behavior The confirmation process is extremely demanding because Supreme Court Justices serve life appointments and because Good Behavior is a relatively low standard to be impeached
It has been exceedingly rare for federal judges to be removed from office
13. Current Supreme Court Justices