140 likes | 297 Views
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners. Bulk Carrier Benchmarking Mr Rob Lomas 13 October 2006. INTERCARGO Dry Bulk Association Member of the Round Table Associate Member - Intermanger Represents about 800 bulkers and increased membership (130 full and associate)
E N D
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Bulk Carrier Benchmarking Mr Rob Lomas 13 October 2006
INTERCARGO • Dry Bulk Association • Member of the Round Table • Associate Member - Intermanger • Represents about 800 bulkers and increased membership (130 full and associate) • Common challenges – quality, safety, responses to regulation
INTERCARGO Benchmarking ethos Should we publish ? • How do stakeholders perceive us? • Stronger demands for transparency • Adequacy of existing information sources – data presentation issues; margin of error • Portraying our members as higher quality • Targeting becoming more important
INTERCARGO • Port State Control analysis of one sector • Extensive statistical analysis – c 6000 bulkers • Analysis of flag, class, owner • “Deficiencies per inspection” correlates with ad-hoc quality definitions
INTERCARGO PSC BENCHMARKING DOCUMENT A : Statistical information (10,000 dwt +) B : PSC Data (Paris / Tokyo / US CG) C : Benchmarking Data D : Further information / recommendations Intercargo Executive Committee meeting on 9 October 2006 – concerns with corruption and uniformity of inspection
INTERCARGO THE FINDINGS Statistics • Fewer dry bulk vessels than thought on “at least one inspection in Paris/Tokyo MoU / US CG areas in 3 years” basis • 6000 vessels; 1200 companies; growth in “Intermanager” controlled bulkers
FINDINGS – PSC Detentions - main Fire fighting : 1st : 598 ISM / Certificates : 2nd : 539 Lifeboats : 3rd : 425 10 other categories – note, serious structural - 149 Many detentions immediately pre-post vessel sale FINDINGS Owners – casualties Context – declining casualties :- 2005 – 6 losses / 1 structural / 0.974 per 100 ships 2004 – 5 / 1 / 1.154 2003 – 4 / 0 / 1.389 …. 1996 – 14 losses INTERCARGO
INTERCARGO Owners Benchmarking Matrix • Deficiencies per inspection (median : 2.44; average owner scored 3.57; Intercargo entered vessel – 2.11) N 90-100 (worst) 7.2 to 41 80-89 5.25-7.69 B- 70-79 4.03-5.23 60-69 3.14-4 50-59 2.45-3.12 B+ 40-49 1.94-2.44 30-39 1.51-1.93 20-29 1.13-1.5 10-19 0.62-1.12 1-9 (best) 0-0.61 • Large “Intermanager”-style third party shipmanagers perform well on quality
Benchmarking Class 2.93 deficiencies per inspection with IACS entered ships; 8.71 for non IACS Intercargo only approves IACS Benchmarking Flag Can only recognise historical performance (2003-2005) Credit for improvements – especially Cyprus Flags outperforming market share included – Panama (+2.22%); Hong Kong (4.82%); Liberia (0.77%); Bahamas (2.25%) INTERCARGO
INTERCARGO Benchmarking – age • Vessels in 22-30 year old range comprise 29% of the fleet but had 53% of the detentions • There are good, older ships but PSC inspectors target older vessels.
INTERCARGO • Benchmarking – Human Element • It is not only the BAD owners which have collisions and groundings but also the GOOD • Collisions 2005 : “A” and B+ managers had 61% of the collisions but comprised 39% of total. • Groundings 2005 : ditto 54% / 39 % • Inference that training requires further attention
INTERCARGO CONCLUSION … FURTHER ACTION • ISM failings to be corrected • Owners should divert attention to detail – certification, minor fire / lifeboat issues • Stakeholder involvement essential • Human Element – the challenge for the good owners • Target corruption
INTERCARGO INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRY CARGO SHIPOWNERS Thank you for your attention www.intercargo.org info@intercargo.org www.shippingfacts.org