1 / 19

Linda Mileshkin on behalf of ANZGOG

THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone . Linda Mileshkin on behalf of ANZGOG. Background.

maxim
Download Presentation

Linda Mileshkin on behalf of ANZGOG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE OUTBACK TRIALA Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared to chemoradiation alone Linda Mileshkin on behalf of ANZGOG

  2. Background • Concurrent cisplatin and radiation the standard of care for locally advanced disease for some time • Recent data at ASCO suggested additional benefit from the use of concurrent cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by 2 cycles cisplatin-gemcitabine (Duenes-Gonzalez et al) • - 9% improvement in PFS and OS at 3 years but increased toxicity

  3. Questions after ASCO • How manageable is the toxicity given others could not deliver cisplatin-gemcitabine/XRT? • : ≥ 1 x G3/G4 toxicity 215 (83%) vs 108 (42%) • : hospitalized 30 vs 11 • : discontinued Rx 18 (7%) vs 1 (<1%) • : transfusions 128 (49%) vs 70 (27%) • What about long-term toxicity? (9 vs 2 pts) • Is the concurrent gemcitabine necessary? • Would further cycles of additional adjuvant chemotherapy improve the results? • Would different drugs be better / less toxic • Should only higher risk patients receive extra Rx?

  4. Patterns of failure • Majority of recurrences are distant • Only a small percentage fail only within the pelvis • Distant failure (extra-pelvic) is a common component of first relapse • Data supports approaches to try and decrease distant metastases in high-risk patients by using systemic therapy

  5. Research Plan • Design: Randomized international phase III study • Eligibility: Stage 1B2-IVa cervical cancer suitable for primary treatment with chemoradiation with curative intent in addition to: • ECOG performance status 0-2 • Histological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous cell carcinoma • WBC ≥ 3.0 x 109/L and ANC ≥ 1.5 x 109/L • Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x UNL

  6. Inclusion Criteria - continued • ASAT/ALAT ≤ 2.5 x UNL • Adequate renal function: creat ≤ ULN or calculated creat clearance (CockCroft-Gault Formula) ≥60ml/min • No contraindication to the use of cisplatin or paclitaxel chemotherapy • Written informed consent

  7. Inclusion Criteria - continued • In order to enrich the trial population for those at high-risk of relapse, centres with funded access to PET and/or MRI for staging would be asked to only enroll patients with • Pelvic nodal involvement on: • staging PET scan, OR • - frozen section during surgery leading to abandonment of planned hysterectomy • b) Parametrial involvement on MRI

  8. Exclusion Criteria • Previous pelvic radiotherapy • Para-aortic nodal involvement above the level of the common iliac nodes or L3/L4 (biopsy proven, PET positive or >2cm on CT) • Previous chemotherapy for this tumour • Evidence of distant metastases • Prior diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis • Peripheral neuropathy > grade 2 • Patients who have undergone hysterectomy or will have a hysterectomy as part of their initial cervix cancer therapy

  9. Exclusion Criteria - continued • Patients with other invasive malignancies, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer, who had (or have) any evidence of the other cancer present within the last 5 years • Patients who are pregnant or lactating • Other serious illness or medical condition that precludes the safe administration of the trial treatment • HIV positive

  10. Objectives • Primary objective: To determine if the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to standard chemoXRT improves progression-free survival • Secondary objectives: To determine • Overall survival rates • Acute and long-term toxicities • Patterns of disease recurrence • Feasability of accrual • Acceptability of radiation QA • Patient quality of life, including psycho-sexual health

  11. Design • Stage IB2-IVa • Cervical cancer: • Stratify for • FIGO stage • Pelvic nodal involvement • Uterine +ve on MRI 4 cycles Carboplatin + Paclitaxel Standard chemoXRT Standard chemoXRT

  12. Intervention • 40 - 45 Gy of external beam XRT in 20 to 25 fractions plus brachytherapy • Cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly during XRT • Within 4 weeks of completion of XRT and following recovery from toxicities, 4 cycles of 3 weekly adjuvant chemotherapy using Carboplatin AUC 5 and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2

  13. Sample size and Statistics • Assuming • Study powered to look for increase in PFS rate at 3 yrs of 11% (55 to 66%) • Accrual = 4 years, follow-up = 24 months • Gompertz survival distribution based on a log-rank test and a two-tailed comparison • Power 80% and 95% confidence • Median time to recurrence = 12 months • For entire phase III: n = 650

  14. Rationale for enriching for high-risk patients • Prospective audit data from 436 pts treated with primary chemoXRT for cervical cancer • Median age = 63 Median FU = 62 months • 226/332 (68%) had corpus invasion on MRI • 132/252 (52%) had PET +ve nodal disease Narayan K 2006 and 2007 and 2009

  15. Relapse rate

  16. Relapse rate

  17. Relapse rate Relapse rate

  18. Distant failure the biggest problem Loco-regional failure in only 17/436 (4%) : para-aortic = 12, pelvic = 5

  19. Survival rates • 5 year OS rate 60% • 5 year FFS rate 55% In pts staged with PET and MRI (n=206), nodal status by PET was the dominant prognostic factor. Traditional prognostic factors of FIGO stage and clinical diameter not significant in this group 5 year OS Positive Negative PET nodal status 48% 70% Corpus involvement 54% 71%

More Related