100 likes | 237 Views
Science Integration. Paul Hertz AAA/Science, SMD Lead, Science Integration Joint Meeting of SScAC/ESSAAC March 30, 2005. Science Integration. Objectives Identify explicit constraints on the Integrated Space Architecture Identify a core mission set from the Strategic Roadmaps
E N D
Science Integration Paul Hertz AAA/Science, SMD Lead, Science Integration Joint Meeting of SScAC/ESSAAC March 30, 2005
Science Integration • Objectives • Identify explicit constraints on the Integrated Space Architecture • Identify a core mission set from the Strategic Roadmaps • Optimize the Integrated Space Architecture / Strategic Plan for science strategic objectives • Create an integrated science story and science strategy for the agency • Provide science rationale and context (drawn from the Strategic Roadmaps) for critical agency decisions
Science Integration • Cast of characters • Lead: Paul Hertz, HQ/SMD • Team: Coordinators from roadmaps with a science component: • 1 Lunar 8 Universe • 2 Mars 9 Earth • 3 Solar System 10 Sun-Solar System • 4 Earth-like Planets 12 Education • 6 ISS • “System scientists” most of whom are not associated with any roadmaps.
Science Integration • System Scientists (so far) • Paul Hertz (HQ) – Lead – Rich Mushotzky (GSFC) • Jay Bergstrahl (LaRC) – Dan McCleese (JPL) • Dale Cruikshank (ARC) – Guenter Riegler (ARC) • Randy Friedl (JPL) – Mark Schoeberl (GSFC) ** • Jim Garvin (HQ) – Rich Vondrak (GSFC • Wes Huntress (CIW) – Mike Werner (JPL) • Mark Jernigan (JSC) – Bruce Wielicki (LaRC) ** • Russ Kerschman (ARC) • Mike King (GSFC) ** ** not confirmed
Science Integration • High priority science activities for NASA • Science that is enabled by exploration • Science that is fundamental and transformative • Science that is required in service to support other objectives (e.g. exploration, climate change, other agencies, etc.) • The Strategic Roadmaps will identify high priority science activities for NASA
Science Integration • Notional Plan • Collect linkages from SRC coordinators • Organizational telecon • Identify additional linkages through reading by system scientists of draft Strategic Roadmaps submitted to NRC on April 15 • Science integration workshop • Present module at first synthesis workshop • Iterate as needs develop
Science Integration • Schedule • Before March 30 • Identify and sign-up system scientists • Telecon with SRC Co-Chairs (March 24) • Interim • Coordinators are identifying potential linkages and submitting them to the APIO matrix • Before April 15 • Planning meeting/telecon (2 hours) (April 5) • Goal: Define the first draft Science Module • Decide how to gather data from the SRM delivery to the NRC • Decide how to gather data from coordinators' notes and APIO matrix • Decide what the first draft Science Module deliverable is • Assign actions and deadlines • April 15 • Strategic Roadmap delivery to NRC
Science Integration • Schedule (continued) • April 15 • Strategic Roadmap delivery to NRC • Interim • System scientists read all SRMs and identify potential linkages • Everyone drafts portions of the Science Module • Before the Synthesis Workshop (mid May) • Working meeting (1-2 days) • Goal: Develop first draft Science Module for delivery to first Synthesis Workshop • Identify true linkages • Create draft timeline/science strategic roadmap/science story/mission set • First Synthesis Workshop (mid/late May) • TBD • and Beyond (TBD) • Review of science module by NSAC at summer meeting • TBD
Strategic Planning Council APIO Integration SAC US ESSS SSS SRC-2 SRC-9 SRC-3 SRC-10 Stakeholders and the Public SRC-4 SRC-8 Roles of SAC and Subcommitteesin Agency Planning Agency SRs ISA SR SRC SMD ? Other MDs Science Integration SRC = Strategic Roadmap Committee
Science Integration • Connections between Strategic Roadmaps • True Roadmap dependencies. • Where a science activity or objective in one Roadmap depends on the completion of a science activity from another Roadmap. • Science that enables technology. • Where a science activity is required before a technical capability can be developed. • Science objective dependencies. • Where achieving a science objective in one Roadmap might depend on or be enhanced by a science activity carried out by another Roadmap. • Science synergies. • Where the science outcomes from multiple Roadmaps contribute to a larger state of knowledge than either one alone.