1 / 13

Fire Blow-Up Modeling: Implications for Situational Awareness & LCES

Fire Blow-Up Modeling: Implications for Situational Awareness & LCES. Jo Ann Fites Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team, USDA Forest Service. Overview. Importance of fire accelerations in fatality fires Near misses? Modeling canyon blow-ups Test on Rattlesnake fatality fire

mayes
Download Presentation

Fire Blow-Up Modeling: Implications for Situational Awareness & LCES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fire Blow-Up Modeling:Implications for Situational Awareness & LCES Jo Ann Fites Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team, USDA Forest Service

  2. Overview • Importance of fire accelerations in fatality fires • Near misses? • Modeling canyon blow-ups • Test on Rattlesnake fatality fire • What does this mean for situational awareness & LCES?

  3. Fire Fatalities & Blow ups What is common to loop, rattlesnake, south canyon, Cramer and others? • Numerous fire fatalities from blow-ups • Especially in drainages or canyons or “chimney’s” • Easily recognized but how fast can blow-ups occur? • Does the speed sink in?

  4. Modeling Canyon Blow-Ups • Holding your finger near a match • Viegas canyon blow-up model • Based on laboratory tests • Mathematical landscape application • Tested with rx burn in chaparral • Viegas applied to several fatality fires in US • Future: predicting when blow-ups occur?

  5. Rattlesnake Fire - Test • 1953 on Mendocino National Forest • 15 fatalities • Acceleration in small drainage a key factor • “Sundowner winds a factor” • Applied Viegas model

  6. Viegas model simulation 2 versions tested 1 – simple 2 – canyon angles Assumptions: winds 3m/s, alpha=.000045

  7. Follow the leader or model? • Model is useful but cannot substitute for the computer with slides in their head • (if it will blow-up)

  8. Applications • What are the implications? • LCES • How much time do you have • for egress? • What are your triggers? • Chuck Hartley • when fire hits the bottom it is time to • go..not wait and see what happens • But this depends on the situation

  9. structures Codfish fire 13 45 Sz? • Egress times for crews from bottom of canyon vs potential speed of fire up chimneys? • 45 min. out for hotshot crews • Accel. times of 13 to 50 minutes 40

  10. Operations 1) Where might it escape, size of WFSA -does the box need to be bigger? 2) overall hazard awareness for resources - improve situational awareness - not a substitute but some means of a “slide” for inexperienced crews 3) egress: - info to compare egress time estimates - setting triggers – go when it is at the bottom no matter what the size of fire 4) spacing of safety zones Have to rely 1st upon good, experienced leadership & what is going on at the fire (Codfish – Rax – “I told you it would not reach your sensors” --this tool is supplemental

More Related