240 likes | 248 Views
Explore the future of NGN signaling peering and the role of VoIP peering in enabling efficient communication and interoperability. Learn about the benefits of VoIP peering and the need for a scalable and secure infrastructure.
E N D
ENUM Overview ENUM - VoIP Peering & the Future of NGN Signaling Peering 2007 Richard Shockey IETF ENUM WG Co-Chair Director – Member of Technical Staff NeuStar, Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling VA 20166 USA richard.shockey@neustar.com richard@shockey.us +1 571.434.5651
NeuStar provides trusted and neutral infrastructure services that allow networks to connect and interoperate, enabling: Routing of 2B telephone numbers daily (NANPA – NPAC) Over 12 billion DNS routing queries monthly Operates .US and .BIZ TLD’s Telco-quality performance – solutions require 99.9% to 99.999% reliability The largest communications registry on Earth And NeuStar has consistently delivered value to customers Providing Automated Access Provisioning for Network Grooming Efficiently Managing Competitive Porting Enabling Network Synergies during Acquisitions Managing Access to Numbering Resources Enabling Interoperability for Short Codes NeuStar Heritage • Additional Highlights • Publicly held company – NSR -NYSE • Awarded GSMA Root Registry (680 GSM Operators) 9/05 • Equinix and Telehouse join global SIP-IX initiative for IMS and VoIP enablement 2/06 • Acquired UltraDNS 4/06 • 800 + Employees
Why are we here? Bye Bye PSTN. Well, eventually. • Shockey’s Law: Money is the answer what is the question? • Voice is a 800 Billion Dollar Global Industry • Deutsche Telecom said it will shut down the PSTN in 2019 • British Telecom said it will have the 21CN fully in place 2015 • KPN talks about 2010 • GSM-A ongoing discussion about IPX • North American Cable Operators are already there. • They WILL optimize VoIP session termination strategies by routing directly from one SP to another in 2007 Is there a DMS / 5ESS bone yard ready?
For the 6,332 time : “Islands of VoIP” problem $ $ • The PSTN is used as the inter-VOIP “default” network • Service is degraded as it must transverse multiple networks • Every VOIP network is an Island (apologies to John Donne!) • Enterprise or carrier VOIP dial plans cannot be remotely accessed by other VOIP gateways • Clash between flat-rate calling and variable network costs • PSTN termination, settlement, and management • Demand to differentiate services in market • Higher quality, presence, usage communities
VoIP Peering: It’s not just VoIP and it’s not just Peering Cross platform Interoperability Any IP session from any device on any network to any device on any network • Reduce complexity and costs • PSTN termination, settlement, and management • Efficient, scalable business and technology models • Secure, high performance infrastructure • Drive higher-level feature sets • Presence, location, communities and quality • Seamless inter-working of SIP and IMS applications across domains • Reliable call setup and service delivery
Core ENUM RFC 3761 ENUM DNS Service 3.DNS returns NAPTR record containing SIP URL to Calling Party UA 2.Calling party proxy UAC queries DNS for endpoint location Responsesip:name@domain.com Query4.3.2.1.5.5.2.0.2.1.e164.arpa “Call Setup” 1.The caller dials the person’s telephone number Sipsip:name@domain.com 4.Calling party UA connects the call Dial +1-202-555-1234 Sip Proxy Sip Proxy
The NGN Signaling Architecture is not fully in place • You HAVE to translate phone numbers into routing information. • SS7/C7 Network cannot be sustained any more than managing 2 networks TDM and IP • There is no new service creation in TDM based networks. • Confusion about the 3 flavors of ENUM • Public - e164.arpa • Infrastructure – ie164.arpa • Private – industry lead or private consortiums • Confusion about the role of a root/apex • Who controls the apex • Is a APEX needed • Confusion about the delegation models. • Do you need Tier 2’s? • Carrier vs Nation State • Enterprises are changing the game as well by demanding IP trunking.
ENUM query technology is winning the NNI Interconnection Signaling Protocol argument • DNS based ENUM is faster than SIP Redirect by a factor of 10 • DNS Queries integrates neatly with SIP URI resolution • Commercial - Private ENUM services have exploded • RFC 3761 is central to all NGN architectures • IMS – 3GPP • MMS/SMS on IP • PacketCable 1.5
Coming – Direct trunking of VoIP to SP Networks http://www.sipforum.org/sipconnect
The Problem with 1st Gen VoIP Peering • First generation peering fabrics won’t scale • Lack of policy control and number validation • Voice, voice, and more voice • New Applications ??? • Major operators want more • Redundant and Resilient Infrastructure • Policy-based control of service exchange • Support for asymmetric business relationships • Global service coverage • Ecosystem of hardware, software, and service providers. • Combining Registry and Termination services lock carriers into single solution.
Public DNS will never work for service providers • Infrastructure ENUM in the Global DNS will never happen. • ie164.arpa • DOA in the IETF • Why would any service provider place information into the global DNS that resolves to points of network interconnection? • Security implications staggering – DDOS • No DNSSEC in our lifetime • SPIT • All service provider relationships have been private and will IMHO continue to be bi-lateral.
Its not about ENUM roots. Its about Registries. • The business processes of how operators exchange data to enable interoperable services • How the data is queried is irrelevant • The Registry must be able to process and distribute both IP as well as PSTN data such as LNP • The existing SS7/C7 signaling networks cannot accommodate NGN IP services. • VoIP Peering requires Telephone Number Registries (databases) • Who do you trust do manage YOUR DATA.
Considerable VoIP traffic will be exchanged at Internet Exchange Points • As Willi Sutton said “ Why do you rob banks ..because that is where the money is.” • The Global Voice network will operate in parallel with classic TCP/IP traffic • Voice is latency sensitive • Voice has higher value per bit - though not as high as SMS • QoS is an issue (perception is reality) • VPN and “big yellow wire interconnections” • VoIP traffic exchanges will be private and bilateral • GSM GPRS/IPX traffic is an example.
NeuStar’s Solution What is SIP-IX? • A coordination function enabling services over IP to interoperate across domains • An extension of NeuStar’s neutrality and number portability, TLD, and DNS expertise • A standards-based Industry Alliance Program and interoperability certification • Infrastructure integrated with the internet’s leading global exchange providers
NeuStar’s Approach and Differentiators • The Operator is the center of the universe • SIP-IX is NOT a “HUB and Spoke” Architecture • The Service is tailored to the needs of Carriers • Comprehensive Product Features and Benefits • Business Model includes Query, Local Replica, and Hosted options • Exclusive IXP-based Service Delivery Architecture • NeuStar’s experience and qualifications are second to none • Neutral third party, with regular audits • Private ENUM services in production for over three years • ISO 9001 compliant, with unmatched ENUM, SIP, DNS expertise • Investment in Industry Standards • Unique experience with the NPAC and service provider customers • Visible Commitment to Industry Partnerships and Alliances • Proven Financial Strength and Transparency
Key Unique Features and Benefits of SIP-IX • Operators control where & how they access route data • Query option at multiple IXP locations • Local Replica option – Subscribe Option • Managed Local Replica option • Operators control partners access to route data • Contextual policy capabilities • Policy control of partner relationships, route exposure, and routing data • Centralized control of multiple services – Voice, video, IM, presence, etc. • Operators control their business relationships • Trading partners are not necessarily peers • Settlement terms are dictated and managed by the operator • Routes are only exposed to approved trading partners • Operators OWN their data and policies.
Key Unique Features and Benefits of SIP-IX (cont.) • Operators control where to exchange bearer traffic • NeuStar is not, and never will be, in the bearer path • Public or private IXP exchange points • Private interconnects • No requirement for unique dedicated links • SIP-IX does NOT create a hubbing architecture that limits connectivity options and injects unwanted latency • Operators are not limited to VoIP endpoints only • “All Call Query” approach includes TDM route discovery option • All data Portability Corrected automatically! • Optional interconnect to TDM endpoints on IP backbones • Optional interconnect to IP endpoints on TDM backbones
All Call Query on Call Origination via 3761 • All PSTN and VoIP or advanced service data delivered in one query. • New Service Delivery is just a URI away. • SIP redirect option avaiable • $ORIGIN. 1.5.6.5.4.3.4.1.7.5.1.carrier.net Output ord pr fl service regexp IN NAPTR 20 10 "u" “E2U+sip" "!^.*$!sip:15714345651@proxy4.mso.net;user=phone!" . and IN NAPTR 10 10 "u" “E2U+sip:contact" "!^.*$!sip:15714345651@240.67.89.124!" . and IN NAPTR 30 10 "u" "E2U+pstn:tel" "!^.*$!tel:+15714345651;npdi;rn=+15712768933" and IN NAPTR 40 10 "u" "E2U+pstn:cnam" "!^.*$!data:application/cnam,Richard%Shockey!" Plus IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+ical“ "!^.*$!http://example.net/user21.ical!" IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+sms“ "!^.*$!mailto:15714345651@mmsc21@carrier.net!“ IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+pres “ "!^.*$!pres:15714345651@mmsc21@carrier.net!“ IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+im“ "!^.*$!im:username@carrier.net!“ IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+vcard“ "!^.*$!http://example.net/vcard.vcf!“
NeuStar’s WMRS – in use by wireless industry today CO Code Assignments Process turns CO Code and NPAC data into URIs, then loads the mapping into the Routing DB How do your route a picture if all you have is a phone number? Private ENUM with LNP Correction for MMS Routing
Internet White Label SIP-IX Services SS7 Application Server Routing DB. STP STP Sonus PSX XO PSX XO PSX Broadsoft Servers XO AS Sonus SGX SBC (ASH, SJC, ORD) SGX SGX National IP Network SIP, RTP Application Server MGCP, RTP SIP, RTP Sonus Remote Market GSX Sonus Local Market GSX IAD IAD Wholesale VOIP Customer 1 PRI CAS DMS / 5E DMS / 5E PBX PSTN PSTN XO Customer Wholesale VOIP Customer 2 TDM VOIP SBC Session Border Control
The SIP-IX Paradigm Subscribe Or Query External SIP-IX at IXP PoP’s Neutral Registry déjà vu all over again All call query on call origination Media Gateway Tandem Access Switch DNS or SIP Redirect Query Response SIP Proxy / SS / CSCF Terminating SIP Proxy / SS / CSCF IP SCP Internal Neutral Registry
There is still work to do. • SPEERMINT WG on Peering / Interconnection • Proposed PEPPERMINT BOF on Registry Provisioning issues. • “ ENUM is specifically chartered to develop protocols that involve the translation of E.164 numbers to URI's. SPEERMINT has been chartered to develop best current practices among real-time application service providers and how such services interconnect across domain boundaries. It is clear from discussions in both working groups that Multi-Media Interconnection will require address of record data to be provisioned among administrative domains outside the normal scope of establishing a SIP session.” • Provisioning goes to the heart of the issue “ How do you trust the data you are using to route?” • Build on RFC 4114 and RFC 4414 ??? • Probably settle on SOAP/XML interfaces • Working to formalize BOF in at IETF 69 in Chicago.