1 / 8

Assessment of Data Fitness for Use

This project aims to develop criteria and a fitness for use label to assess the quality of research data. The pilot implementation will involve data depositors, repositories, and users.

mcastro
Download Presentation

Assessment of Data Fitness for Use

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WDS/RDA Assessment of Data Fitness for UseClaire Austin, Helena Cousijn, Michael Diepenbroek, Jon Petters

  2. Deliverables Data Fitness group • Descriptions and definitions of data fitness criteria • Development of a fitness for use label based on defined criteria • Piloting the implementation of a fitness for use label

  3. Definitions Draft definitions available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1a06BM0pZJ3MxuUXbdz9EuLoq4vYf1GmVIenQ6Mp0chs/edit E.g. Data quality is defined by internal characteristics such as completeness, logical consistency, positional and thematic accuracy, temporal quality, etc. RELATED TERM: data fitness for purpose In collaboration with: http://dictionary.casrai.org/Category:Research_Data_Domain Next steps: subgroup will write paper outlining relevant terminology (Claire.Austin@canada.za)

  4. Fitness criteria Mapping of criteria (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NL8EFbxspvt1eT6ZBVxsYYo1SRAtR4lCCiaY2bQdQCs/) • FAIR • ESIP quality cluster • GEO quality criteria 3 perspectives • Data depositors • Data repositories • Data users Checklist/questionnaire for depositors and repositories > ‘label’ for users

  5. Assessing fitness FAIR assessment tool

  6. Assessing fitness FAIR assessment tool pilot • DANS • CCDC • DRYAD • MendeleyData • Virginia Tech Results @ 11am, Mansfield 5! F A I R 2 User Reviews 1 Archivist Assessment 24 Downloads

  7. Questions • Could datasets become part of the CoreTrustSeal? • Would assessing Data Fitness become dependent on repository certification? • Do we need to go beyond FAIR to assess Data Fitness?

More Related