1 / 14

Forensic Art

Forensic Art. Pathology 4. Forensic Approximation. Forensic approximation is a process that attempts to recreate unidentified person’s likeness Uses several sciences to make accurate predictions Anthropology Osteology Anatomy There is also an element of art. Forensic Approximation.

Download Presentation

Forensic Art

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forensic Art Pathology 4

  2. Forensic Approximation • Forensic approximation is a process that attempts to recreate unidentified person’s likeness • Uses several sciences to make accurate predictions • Anthropology • Osteology • Anatomy • There is also an element of art

  3. Forensic Approximation • Used for non-criminal applications as well as law • Legally controversial • Fails the Daubert Standard (1993) • Expert testimony • No two experts would derive the exact same conclusion • Not admissable as evidence in court • Can be used as an investigative aid only

  4. Forensic Approximation Forensic approximation of the “Spirit Cave Man,” one of only a few complete skeletons found in the United States over 8,000 years old.

  5. Forensic Approximation • History • First used in 1883 for archeological digs • First study of facial tissue thickness was completed • First used in forensics in 1962

  6. Identification • Two types of identification • Circumstantial • Individual fits the general profile for a set of skeletal remains • Positive • Individual has unique set of characteristics shared with skeletal remains • Facial reconstructions are the most common

  7. Facial Reconstructions • Generally based on skull, photographs, x-rays • Usually require both an anthropologist and an artist • 3 Types • 2D Reconstruction • Hand drawn or computer generated portraits • FACE and CARES software • 3D Reconstruction • Includes sculptures, 3D computer imagery

  8. 3D Facial Reconstruction

  9. Facial Reconstructions • Superimposition • Only useful if there is some idea of the remains’ identity • Places a photograph over x-ray of skull and looks for similarities

  10. Superimposition

  11. Facial Reconstructions • Thorough exam of skull needed • Muscle attachments • Damage, wounds • Shape of skull, eyes, nasal openings • Skull cleaned and damaged areas repaired with wax • Mandible reattached • Eyes inserted • Pegs used to identify typical tissue thickness • Nose is largely an educated guess

  12. Soft Tissue Reconstruction

  13. Limitations of Facial Reconstructions • Insufficient data • Face is extremely complicated • 10 muscle groups in human face • Subtle differences between races, sex, body builds • Cartilage does not remain • No standardization • Different techniques and approaches • Subjectivity • Wrinkles, birthmarks, skin folds

  14. Famous Reconstructions In 2005, forensic anthropologists and artists worked together to create the face of the legendary King Tut.

More Related