1 / 19

Clinical Scenario

Clinical Scenario. Step 1: Ask an answerable clinical question--P. I. C. O. Patient / Problem : Intervention / Exposure: Comparison: Outcome:. PICO. Question: Patient / Problem : Intervention / Exposure: Comparison: Outcome:.

melanie-ashley
Download Presentation

Clinical Scenario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical Scenario

  2. Step 1: Ask an answerable clinical question--P. I. C. O. Patient / Problem : Intervention / Exposure: Comparison: Outcome:

  3. PICO Question: • Patient / Problem : • Intervention / Exposure: • Comparison: • Outcome:

  4. Step 2: Effective searches for the best Evidence

  5. 搜尋策略的設計表 SEARCH STRATEGY DESIGN TABLE

  6. 實際搜尋 ACTUAL SEARCHES

  7. Step 3: Critically appraise that evidence for its validity and importance

  8. A.文獻的結果能令人信服嗎? Are the results of this prognosis study valid?

  9. 本文獻： □Yes □No □Unclear 評論Comment： 1. Was a defined, representative sample of patients assembled at a common (usually early) point in the course of their disease?

  10. 本文獻： □Yes □No □Unclear 評論Comment： 2. Was patient follow-up sufficiently long and complete?

  11. 本文獻： □Yes □No □Unclear 評論Comment： 3. Were objective outcome criteria applied in a “blind” fashion?

  12. 本文獻： □Yes □No □Unclear 評論Comment： 4. If subgroups with different prognoses are identified, was there adjustment for important prognostic factors?

  13. 本文獻： □Yes □No □Unclear 評論Comment： 5. Was there validation in an independent group (“test set”) of patients?

  14. B.文獻的結果夠重要嗎?Are the valid results of this prognosis study important?

  15. 6. How likely are the outcomes over time? • Typically, results from prognosis studies are reported in one of three ways: • as a percentage of survival at a particular • point in time (such as 1-year or 5-year survival rates); • 2)as median survival (the length of follow-up • by which 50% of study patients have died); or • 3)as survival curves that depict, at each point • in time, the proportion (expressed as a • percentage) of the original study sample who • have NOT yet had a specified outcome. • In prognosis studies we often find results presented as Kaplan–Meier curves, which are a type of survival curve. Prognosis shown as survival curves (dashed line indicates median survival). A: Good prognosis (or too short a study!). B: Poor prognosis early, then slower increase in mortality, with median survival of 3 months. C: Good prognosis early, then worsening, with median survival of 9 months. D: Steady prognosis.

  16. 7. How precise are the prognostic estimates?

  17. C.文獻的結果能應用到我們的病人嗎? Can we apply this valid, important evidence about prognosis in caring for our patient?

  18. 8.Were the study patients similar to our own?

  19. 9.Will this evidence make a clinically important impact on our conclusions about what to offer or tell our patient?

More Related