210 likes | 369 Views
Avi Wigderson IAS, Princeton. The zigzag product, Expander graphs & Combinatorics vs. Algebra. ’00 Reingold, Vadhan, W. ’01 Alon, Lubotzky, W. ’01 Capalbo, Reingold, Vadhan, W. ’02 Meshulam, W. ’03 Rozenman, Shalev, W. Expanding Graphs - Properties.
E N D
Avi Wigderson IAS, Princeton The zigzag product,Expander graphs & Combinatorics vs. Algebra ’00 Reingold, Vadhan, W. ’01 Alon, Lubotzky, W. ’01 Capalbo, Reingold, Vadhan, W. ’02 Meshulam, W. ’03 Rozenman, Shalev, W.
Expanding Graphs - Properties • Combinatorial: no small cuts, high connectivity • Probabilistic: rapid convergence of random walk • Algebraic: small second eigenvalue Theorem. [C,T,AM,A,JS] All properties are equivalent!
Expanders - Definition Undirected, regular (multi)graphs. Definition. The 2nd eigenvalue of a d-regular G (G) = max { || (AG /d) v || : ||v||=1 , v 1 } (G) [0,1] Definition. {Gi}is an expander family if (Gi) <1 Theorem [P]Most 3-regular graphs are expanders. Challenge: Explicit (small degree) expanders! Gis [n,d]-graph: nvertices, d-regular Gis [n,d, ]-graph: (G) .
Applications of Expanders In CS • Derandomization • Circuit Complexity • Error Correcting Codes • Communication Networks • Approximate Counting • Computational Information • …
Applications of Expanders In Pure Math • Topology – expanding manifolds [Br,G] • Group Theory – generating random gp elements [Ba,LP] • Measure Theory – Ruziewicz Problem [D,LPS], • F-spaces [KR] • Number Theory – Thin Sets [AIKPS] • Graph Theory - … • …
Bx G [2n,d,1/8]-graph G explicit! {0,1}n random strings r rk r1 x x x Alg Alg Alg Majority Deterministic amplification Pr[error] < 1/3 Thm [Chernoff] r1 r2….rkindependent (kn random bits) Thm [AKS] r1 r2….rkrandom path (n+ O(k) random bits) then Pr[error] = Pr[|{r1 r2….rk }Bx}| > k/2] < exp(-k)
A = SL2(p): group 2 x 2 matrices of det 1 over Zp. S = { M1 , M2 } : M1 = ( ) , M2 = ( ) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 Algebraic explicit constructions [M,GG,AM,LPS,L,…] Many such constructions are Cayleygraphs. A a finite group, S a set of generators. Def. C(A,S) has vertices A and edges (a, as) for all aA, sSS-1. Theorem. [L]C(A,S) is an expander family. Proof: “The mother group approach”: • Use SL2(Z)to define a manifold N. • Bound the e-value of (the Laplacian of) N [Sel] • Show that the above graphs “well approximate” N. Works with any finite generating set, other groups, group actions… Theorem. [LPS,M] Optimal d(G) = 2(d-1) [AB]
Is expantion a group property? A constant number of generators. Annoying questions: • non-expanding generators for SL2(p)? • Expanding generators for the family Sn? • expanding generators for Z n? No! [K] Basic question [LW]:Is expansion a group property? Is C(Gi,Si) an expander family if C(Gi,Si’) is? Theorem. [ALW]No!! Note: Easy for nonconstant number of generators: C(F2m,{e1, e2, …,em}) is not an expander (This is just the Boolean cube) But v1,v2, …,v2mfor which C(F2m,{v1,v2, …,v2m})is an expander (This is just a good linear error-correcting code)
H Definition. G zHhas vertices {(v,k) : vG, kH}. (v,k) v u Edges in clouds between clouds u-cloud v-cloud Theorem. [RVW]G zHis an [nm,d+1,f(,)]-graph, and <1, <1 f(,)<1. G zH is an expander iff Gand Hare. Explicit Constructions (Combinatorial)-Zigzag Product [RVW] Gan [n, m, ]-graph. H an [m, d, ]-graph. Combinatorial construction of expanders.
G zHis the cube-connected-cycle ([m2m,3]-graph) Example G=B2m, the Boolean m-dim cube ([2m,m]-graph). H=Cm , the m-cycle ([m,2]-graph). m=3
A stronger product z’: Theorem. [RVW]G z’ H is an [nm,d2,+]-graph. • Gk+1 = Gk2 z’ H Iterative Construction of Expanders G an [n,m,]-graph. H an [m,d,] -graph. Proof: Follows simple information theoretic intuition. The construction: Start with a constant size H a [d4,d,1/4]-graph. • G1 = H 2 Theorem. [RVW]Gk is a [d4k, d2, ½]-graph. Proof: Gk2 is a [d 4k,d 4, ¼]-graph. H is a [d 4, d, ¼]-graph. Gk+1 is a [d 4(k+1), d 2, ½]-graph.
Beating e-value expansion In the following a is a large constant. Task:Construct an [n,d]-graph s.t. every two sets of size n/a are connected by an edge. Minimized Ramanujan graphs: d=(a2) Random graphs: d=O(a log a) Zig-zag graphs: [RVW]d=O(a(log a)O(1)) Uses zig-zag product on extractors!
Lossless expanders [CRVW] Task: Construct an [n,d]-graph in which every set of size at most n/a expands by a factor c. Maximize c. Upper bound: cd Ramanujan graphs: [K]c d/2 Random graphs: c (1-)d Lossless Zig-zag graphs: [CRVW]c (1-)d Lossless Use zig-zag product on conductors!! Extends to unbalanced bipartite graphs. Applications (where the factor of 2 matters): Data structures, Network routing, Error-correcting codes
n-k n Error Correcting Codes [Shannon, Hamming] C: {0,1}k {0,1}nC=Im(C) Rate (C) = k/n Dist (C) = min d(C(x),C(y)) C good if Rate (C) = (1), Dist (C) = (n) Find good, explicit, efficient codes. Graph-based codes [G,M,T,SS,S,LMSS,…] 0 0 0 0 0 0Pz + + + + + + 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 z zC iff Pz=0 C is a linear code Trivial Rate (C) k/n ,Encoding time = O(n2) Glossless Dist (C) = (n), Decoding time = O(n)
n-k n Decoding Thm [CRVW]Can explicitly construct graphs: k=n/2, bottom deg = 10, B[n], |B| n/200, |(B)| 9|B| 0 0 1 0 1 1 Pw + + + + + + 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 w Decoding alg [SS]: while Pw0 flip all wi with i in FLIP = { i : (i) has more 1’s than 0’s } B = set of corrupted positions |B| n/200 B’ = set of corrupted positions after flip Claim [SS] : |B’| |B|/2 Proof: |B \ FLIP | |B|/4, |FLIP \ B | |B|/4
Theorem [ALW]C(A x B, {s}T ) = C (A,S ) z C (B,T ) Semi-direct Product of groups A,Bgroups. B acts on A as automorphisms. Let ab denote the action of bon a. Definition. A B has elements {(a,b) : aA, bB}. group mult(a’,b’) (a,b)= (a’ab, b’b) Main Connection Assume <T> = B, <S> = A , S = sB(S is a single B-orbit) Large expanding Cayley graphs from small ones. Proof: (of Thm) (a,b)(1,t) = (a,bt) (Step in a cloud) (a,b)(s,1) = (asb,b) (Step between clouds) Extends to more orbits
G zH = C(A xB, {e1 } {1 } ) Example A=F2m, the vector space, S={e1, e2, …, em} , the unit vectors B=Zm, the cyclic group, T={1}, shift by 1 Bacts on A by shifting coordinates. S=e1B. G =C(A,S), H = C(B,T),and Expansion is not a group property! [ALW] C(A, e1B ) is notan expander. C(A xB, {e1 } {1 } )is not an expander. C(A, u BvB) is an expander for most u,v A. [MW] C(A xB, {uBvB } {1 } )is an expander (almost…)
FqG expands with constant many orbits Thm 1 G has at most exp(d) irreducible reps of dimension d. Thm 2 G is expanding and monomial. Dimensions of Representations in Expanding Groups [MW] G naturally acts on FqG (|G|,q)=1 Assume: G is expanding Want: G x FqG expanding Lemma. If G is monomial, so is G x FqG
Iterative probabilistic construction of near-constant degree expanding Cayley graphs Iterate: G’ = G x FqG Start with G1 = Z3 Get G1 , G2,…, Gn ,… Exist S1 , S2,…, Sn ,… <Sn > = Gn Theorem. [MW] (C(Gn, Sn)) ½ (expanding Cayley graphs) |Sn| O(log(n/2)|Gn|) (deg “approaching” constant) Theorem [LW] This is tight!
Iterative explicit construction of constant degree expanding Cayley graphs (under assumption) Iterate: G’ = G wr Ak Start with G1 = Ak Get G1 , G2,…, Gn ,… Construct S1 , S2,…, Sn ,… Theorem. [RSW] (C(Gn, Sn)) ½ (expanding Cayley graphs) |Sn| k (explicit, constant degree) Assumption Ak can be made expanding with kgenerators
Open Questions • Are Sk expanding with some constant generating set? with some size kgenerating set? Are SL2(p) always expanding with every constant gen set? Expanding Cayley graphs of constant degree “from scratch”. Explicit undirected, const degree, lossless expanders Prove or disprove: every expanding group Ghas <exp (d) I irreducible representations of dimension d.