1 / 36

Damus -Kaye- Stansel & Norwood , as procedures .

부산대학교 어린이병원 심장센터 김 시호 . Damus -Kaye- Stansel & Norwood , as procedures . Introduction. The ‘Spectrum’ needs DKS type procedures. 4 Key-Elements . Avoiding Pressure load Excessive Vol. load Minimizing PVR Maintaining optimal PA growth. Amalgamation Creation of unrestricted pathway

melody
Download Presentation

Damus -Kaye- Stansel & Norwood , as procedures .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 부산대학교 어린이병원 심장센터 김 시호 Damus-Kaye-Stansel&Norwood , as procedures.

  2. Introduction

  3. The‘Spectrum’ needsDKS type procedures

  4. 4 Key-Elements • Avoiding • Pressure load • Excessive Vol. load • Minimizing PVR • Maintaining optimal PA growth • Amalgamation • Creation of unrestricted pathway • RV to • Aortic arch, • Descending aorta, • Coronary circulation • Establish PA flow • Perfusion strategies • Removal of interatrial septum.

  5. Amalgamation with non-natural tissue • Homograft – Standard • Arch incision twist ↓ • Bowstring effect ↓ • ↑aggressive augmentation • LPA compression • MPA bifurcation compression • ← excessvely large proximal neoaorta • Coronary artery compromise • v shaped incision • end-to-end implantation

  6. Amalgamation with non-natural tissue

  7. Amalgamation with non-natural tissue

  8. Amalgamation without non-natural tissue • Sano S , ATS 2009;87:178–86

  9. Amalgamation without non-natural tissue • Mee RBB, JTCS 2000;120:875-84 • Ascending aorta implant

  10. Amalgamation without non-natural tissue • Bowstring effect of neoaorta • Short and big neoaorta • No calcificaiton in the cuff of homograft • No growth potential • Calcification • Aneurysmal change

  11. Amalgamation without non-natural tissue • Sung S, J Card Surg2008 Sep 12. [ahead of print]

  12. Pulmonary Blood Flow Set-up • Systemic to pulmonary shunt (Ao-PA) • Parallel circulation • RV to PA conduit (RV-PA) • Bidirectional Cavo Pulmonary Shunt

  13. Ao-P shunt RV-PA shunt Pulmonary Blood Flow Set-up • Good & even PA growth • Venriculotomy • ↓Ventricular function • TR • Arrhythmia • Obstruction • PA disfiguration  Bad BCPS prep. • Hypoxemia  Early BCPS • Limited PA growth • Diastolic pr. ↑ ↑Coronary pr. • No particular manipulations to control PVR & SVR • Good & even PA growth (?)

  14. Pulmonary Blood Flow Source

  15. Perfusion strategies Imoto , JTCS 2002;122:879-82 Lim , EJTCS 2003;23:149 Tchervenkov, ATS 2000;70:1730-3

  16. Postoperative Care All children’s Hospital symposium & “Heart week in Florida” 2007 • Hemodynamic instability (Qp, Qs) • Single ventricle • Parallel circulation • Stresses of CPB  SVR ↑ • Circulatory arrest • Dynamics of neonate (Rp,Rs) • Larger shunt ; poorer systemic O2 delivery • SVR is more effect than PVR • Heart rate has a minimal effect on SaO2 • Better correlation between MVO2 and O2 delivery • Better predictor of anaerobic metabolism than BP, PP, O2 extraction rate • Optimizing SvO2 improves “complication free” survival • O2 delivery  at 6 postop. hrs. - unrelated Qp/Qs • Qp/Qs = 1

  17. Postoperative Care Advances • Routine use of VAD. Ungerleider, MD, • Increasing cardiac output during assist  increase cerebral O2delivery and metabolism  translate into improved neurologic outcome • Overall hospital survival – 87 % (  95%. Lately) • Practical use of Phenoxybenzamine.Van Arsdell, MD, • Irreversible α-1 and α -2 adrenergic receptor blocker • Profound systemic vasodilator • Optimization of systemic CO by maximal dilation of systemic circulation • Prevent the acute, unexpected increases in SVR • Diminish myocardial O2consumption • Manipulate the Qs side of the Qp:Qs balance

  18. Postoperative Care Advances Guzzetta, Anesth Analg 2007;105:312-5 Elevations in PVR Control PVR  Control SVR Shunt size-doesn’t matter Tweddell, ATS 1999;67:165

  19. Postoperative Care Example: A patient POD#3 s/p Norwood, relatively stable has oxygen saturations around 80% (by pulse ox, correlating with gases). MVS from a jugular line is 60%. What is this patient's Qp:Qs? Qp80%-60% = 20 = 1 Qs 100-%-80% 20 Qp:Qs = Sat (aorta) - Sat(SVC) Sat (pulm venous) - Sat (PA)

  20. Postop Outcomes Ao-PA .vs. RV-PA

  21. Postop Outcomes Ao-PA .vs. RV-PA Ao-P shunt RV-PA shunt • Hospital mortality 6.1%  • Phenoxybenzamin • Home monitoring program • 4th WCPCCS in Argentina, 2005 • Hospital mortality 8% (5 of 62 patients) • Sano S , ATS 2009;87:178–86

  22. Outcomes of DKS Out of Hospital • 2 Tails of 1 Tale

  23. Outcomes of DKS Out of Hospital • Staged approach expecting LV growth : Stall tactic • Possibility of LV growth except for Critical AS • Especially when “semi rigid structure” (MV, AV) is normal without EFE • Restrictive PFO  ↑Mitral inflow

  24. Outcomes of HLHS According to Amalgamation • Van Arsdell, JTCS 2005;130:61-5

  25. Outcomes of HLHS According to Amalgamation Sung S, J Card Surg 2008 Sep 12. 부산대 어린이병원 심장센터

  26. Outcomes of HLHS ImmediateHemodynamics Ao-P .vs. RV-PA • Ghanayem, ATS 2006;82:1603-10 • 48 hour postoperative hemodynamics • Contemporary comparison • Randomized study • Higher DBP with RV-PA but, do not show increased systemic oxygen delivery

  27. Outcomes of HLHS Vent. function Ao-P .vs. RV-PA • Ballweg, JTCS 2007;134:297-303 • Echo & Cath • RV-PA (62) or Ao-P (114) • Contemporary : • 2002 ~2005 • at the time of BCPS • Cross-sectional analysis • More ventricular dysfunction in RV-PA • during the interstage time • at the time of BCPS • Afterload reduction • 80% - RV-PA • 50% - Ao-P • Do not appear to recover with unloading of ventricle c BCPS

  28. Outcomes of HLHS PA growth Ao-P .vs. RV-PA • Ballweg, JTCS 2007;134:297-303 • Echo & Cath • RV-PA (62) or Ao-P (114) • Contemporary : • 2002 ~2005 • at the time of BCPS • Cross-sectional analysis • “tented,” or pulled forward in RV-PA • Positioning of shunt  • PA size • Preferential flow to LPA • RPA stenosis in RV-PA • Long segment distortion, hypoplasia at insertion site in RV-PA

  29. Outcomes of HLHS at BCPC Sano , ATS 2009;87:178–86 February 1998 ~ June 2007

  30. Outcomes of HLHS at BCPC Home surveillance • All discharged patient with Ao-P shunt (not historical control ) • Daily log of wt and SaO2 at home • Contact their physician • SaO2 < 70% • acute wt loss > 30 g in 24 hours • failure to gain at least 20 g during a 3-day period.

  31. 15.8% (n = 9/57)  0% (n = 0/24) Outcomes of HLHS at BCPC Home surveillance • Plateau phase of weight gain after 150 days

  32. Current interstage F/U protocol • Early detection of hemodynamically important lesions • Home monitoring • Early transition (Stage 2, exp, 2v repair) ; Stage 2 should be done sooner to minimize central PA distortion • Patient selection

  33. 4th WCPCCS in Argentina, 2005

  34. Summary • Apply to various anatomic pathology – Spectrum • Innovative perioperative strategies  increasing success on the clinical results • No significant differences in hospital mortality and the stage 1 morbidity & mortality between Ao-P & RV-PA • Results tend to improve with most strategies “over time”  must be evaluated over time by rigid analysis

  35. Outcomes of HLHS Hemodynamics , at BCPC Ao-P .vs. RV-PA • Ballweg, JTCS 2007;134:297-303 • Echo & Cath • RV-PA (62) or Ao-P (114) • Contemporary : • 2002 ~2005 • at the time of BCPS • Cross-sectional analysis

More Related