160 likes | 247 Views
Stabilization. Public Private PPP. Urban models. Driver of competitiveness Requirements. Intervention built. Competitive Advantage. Decline. Obsolete Urban Functions Redesign of Functions. Tools Instruments. Stabilization. Urban models. Renewal. 2. Redevelopment.
E N D
Stabilization Public Private PPP Urban models Driver of competitiveness Requirements. Intervention built Competitive Advantage Decline Obsolete Urban Functions Redesign of Functions Tools Instruments Stabilization
Urban models • Renewal 2. Redevelopment 3. Regeneration 4. Recover 5. Revitalisation 6. ‘Framework’ 7. Gentrification 8. ‘Restructuring’
Mike Raco Geographer Bryn Jones Economist Steve Miles Sociologist Speakers Cliff Hague Urban Planner Political scientist Simon Guy
Cliff Hague no rapid urbanization but implosion urban planning (what do we consider about urban planning)?
Steve Miles rhetorical device? inclusion/exclusion cultural or creative city are buzz-words or evident phenomenon?
It is absolutely essential that social theory does not degenerate into meaningless rhetoric. Globalization is a good example of how a particular theoretical perspective has become a sociological buzz-word. The buzz-word is the adversary of reflexive social theory. More phenomenon are create from buzz-word more than the evidence ?
Bryn Jones networks of governance’ multi lateral-governance multi-purpose process of participation
Simon Guy private finance and investiment into urban regeneration investitors are only interested in institutional property and buildings sustainable urban future The notion of models is often used in an over deterministic way models are often used into reality though physical planning and design policies
Mike Raco What is PPP? What type of subjects is possible find inside PPP Are PPP ‘voluntarist’ partnership What types of: a) target; b) budget; c) agreements; d) procedures; e) founds; f) estate etc. do they join?
Cardiff Bay Development Corporation (CBDC The study demonstrates how the association, which consistedof local businesses, tried to influence the local regeneration programmes and how its ‘progrowth’stance was actively used by the CBDC to legitimate its own policies in the face ofwider criticisms from local residential groups. The paper looks at the difficulties of constructinglocal community participation and concludes that voluntarist, top-down partnershipstructures in existing policy may only serve to legitimate and implement policy decisions taken by powerful non locally-accountable regeneration agencies