1 / 13

Manchester Essex Regional School District Budget Workshop January 19, 2010

Manchester Essex Regional School District Budget Workshop January 19, 2010. Our FY11 Fiscal Challenge. Increased costs of doing business Health insurance Increased special education out of district costs Increased student enrollment Negotiated salary increases

Download Presentation

Manchester Essex Regional School District Budget Workshop January 19, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Manchester Essex Regional School DistrictBudget WorkshopJanuary 19, 2010

  2. Our FY11 Fiscal Challenge Increased costs of doing business • Health insurance • Increased special education out of district costs • Increased student enrollment • Negotiated salary increases • Utilities for larger building (2times square footage) It costs more to deliver the same educational services as we did last year

  3. Financial Trend: Escalating Costs & Declining State Aid • Mandated spending, contractual obligations driving annual budget increases • State funding cuts reflect deteriorating economy *State Aid = MERSD’s Chapter 70 and Regional Transportation Revenue

  4. Special Education Costs Outpacing Reimbursements *FY-10 Budget included DESE’s original Circuit Breaker reimbursement estimate of $441K and operating expenses of $990K. **FY-10 Forecast includes revised DESE Circuit Breaker reimbursement estimate of $237K and operating expense of $1.28 million

  5. The Dilemma • FY 11 Level Service Operating Budget - $20,765,538 • $1,871,134 (9.9 %) increase over FY 10 • Over 12% increase to town assessments • Recognizing towns’ funding constraints while holding onto district goal to maintain educational program, district has worked to target reductions • Reductions needed to reach • 5.0% $1,228,200 • 4.5% $1,308,899 • 4.0% $1,389,598 • 3.5% $1,470,297 • 3.0% $1,550,996

  6. Working towards the Solution • Use additional reserves $567,500 • School Choice, E&D, Stabilization • Reduce salaries $386,000 • Eliminate/combine positions • Reduce expenses $265,000 • Reduce instructional supply, curriculum, professional development and technology budgets • Increase revenues $171,500 • New/increase fees for athletics, busing, student parking; additional School Choice students Total Savings $1,390,000 – 4%

  7. Beyond the 4% Reduction • A reduction to 3% means an additional $160,000 beyond the $1.4 million in cuts identified • Additional cuts will mean critical losses to educational programs Items under consideration include: • Reducing kindergarten to half day for all (eliminate full day) • Restructuring/eliminating elementary specialists (possible 4.5 days per week model) • Concessions (salary, health insurance, etc.) from administrators, support staff and META* *Subject to negotiations

  8. Kindergarten Options • Current Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) Program: • Puts all students on trajectory to continue MERSD’s tradition of academic excellence • Estimated program cost: $370K • Budget Option 1: Introduce tuition for current full-day program. • Benefits: retain academic rigor and subsidize investment in program which currently exceeds State/Federal guidelines • Drawbacks: • Additional ½ day option needed for families choosing not to pay tuition for FDK • 50% avg. sign up rate in MA for tuition K, suggests wider range of student readiness for 1st grade • Potential incremental revenue: $140K • Budget Option 2: Eliminate FDK, return to Half Day Model • Benefits: similar savings with consistency of academic program across grade level • Drawbacks: major set back to MERSD’s academic preparedness strategy • Potential savings: $160K • Administration Recommendation • Retain FDK, and seek savings with lesser impact to academic program • Rationale: benefits of modifications likely outweighed by significant impact to student readiness

  9. Reallocation of Administrative Resources 2010-2011 High School – Principal Jim Lee, Assistant Principal Paul Murphy Middle School – Principal Beth Raucci (with support from Paul Murphy) Memorial School – Principal Beth Raucci (with support from Jen Roberts and Scott Morrison) Essex Elementary School – Principal Jen Roberts Director of Curriculum and Instruction – Scott Morrison

  10. Roles and Responsibilities • Middle School Principal – Beth Raucci • Office located at Middle School • Primary contact for Students, Staff, and Parents • Instructional Leader/Middle School Philosophy Support to Middle School Principal – Paul Murphy/Middle School Team Leaders Serve in Assistant Principal role at MS/HS Supervision in hallways/dining hall Team Leader concept model

  11. Roles and Responsibilities • Memorial School Principal – Beth Raucci • Primary office located at Memorial School • Primary contact for Students, Staff, and Parents • Instructional Leader Support to Memorial School Principal- Scott Morrison and Jen Roberts Assist with observations/evaluations of staff Provide support to on-site teacher “substitute principals” in Principal’s absence

  12. Plan Designed to Foster Schools/District Goals • School/District Climate Task Force K-8 • Vertical and Horizontal Articulation Literacy and Science K-8 • School Improvement Plan Goals Middle School Initiatives Memorial School Initiatives • Parent Involvement – School Improvement Councils, PTO’s, etc.

  13. Conclusion • Current status at 4% reduction represents considerable loss to schools with the $1.4 million cut • Administration strongly recommends to School Committee not to go beyond 4% at this time - talks with towns and Association ongoing - further cuts, if needed, would significantly impact quality of school district • Beyond addressing the significant gap this year, need to look at multi-year strategy for cost containment while continuing to maintain quality of academic program

More Related