310 likes | 450 Views
A ntitrust Economics 2013. David S. Evans University of Chicago, Global Economics Group. Elisa Mariscal CIDE, Global Economics Group. Topic 11: Market Definition FOR multisided platforms. Topic 11| Part 2 3 October 2013. Overview. A Shopping Mall Merger Example. 3. 1. 2. 4.
E N D
Antitrust Economics 2013 David S. Evans University of Chicago, Global Economics Group Elisa Mariscal CIDE, Global Economics Group Topic 11: Market Definition FOR multisided platforms Topic 11| Part 2 3 October 2013
A Shopping Mall Merger Example 3 1 2 4 What are the relevant market(s)? Can we use traditional SSNIP-based tools to answer that? How do we assess market power? Would the merger result in a “substantial lessening of competition” in those markets?
Shopping Malls and Anchor Stores Anchor Store
Accounting for Two-Sided Effects Makes Demand More Elastic Space in a Shopping Mall For a price change around this point the flatter curve reflects the feedback effects on the shopper side resulting from fewer or less interesting stores Price per meter $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 9 10 3 4 6 7 8 1 2 5 11 Thousands of meters rented
Accounting for Two-Sided Effects Makes Demand More Elastic The magnifying effect of the complementary side on demand response to price increase As a result of positive feedback effects a 5% increase in the price on side A leads in this example to a 30% decrease in the quantity on side A and a 10% decrease in the quantity on side B. True demand elasticity with feedback effects of 6 rather than 4.
The Cross-Effects for the Shopping Mall Merger Reduce the Ability to Raise Prices How much this matters in practice depends on how big the cross-effects are. They may be small enough to ignore safely, or so big they must be considered.
Multihoming May Make Alternative Platforms Closer Substitutes in the Short-Run
Avoid Excluding One Side of the Platform From Analysis Next section deals with pragmatic approaches about dealing with this problem. This section shows that even on a single side the traditional analysis leads to improperly defined markets.
Single-Sided Critical Loss Wrong WRONG Single-sided formulas are wrong because they are based on the simple price-cost markup result which is wrong because it ignores linked demand between the two sides. WRONG WRONG
Applying Single-Sided Tests to Two-Sided Platforms Leads to Multiple Errors Magnitude and relevance of these errors depend on the degree of the cross-effects and thus how “two-sided” the relevant businesses really are.
SSNIP Approach with Total Price and Additive Prices Modified Lerner Index for simple Rochet-Tirole Model with each side jointly consuming a “transaction”
Pragmatic Approaches to the Analysis of Two-Sided Market Definition and Power
Key Lesson: Avoid Approaches that Result in the Exclusion of a Customer Side from the Analysis
Taking a More Open Approach to the Analysis of Market Definition and Power for Two-Sided Platforms Focus on competitive effects rather than a precise market definition.