1 / 29

Antenna Elevation Pattern Estimation from Rain Forest Data

Antenna Elevation Pattern Estimation from Rain Forest Data. M. Zink ENVISAT Programme ESA-ESTEC. Content. Estimation Approach Fine-Tuning of VV patterns at ScanSAR sub-swath boundaries HH Beam Patterns VH Beam Patterns HV Beam Patterns Comparison with pre-launch patterns.

michaelwest
Download Presentation

Antenna Elevation Pattern Estimation from Rain Forest Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Antenna Elevation Pattern Estimationfrom Rain Forest Data M. Zink ENVISAT Programme ESA-ESTEC ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  2. Content • Estimation Approach • Fine-Tuning of VV patterns at ScanSAR sub-swath boundaries • HH Beam Patterns • VH Beam Patterns • HV Beam Patterns • Comparison with pre-launch patterns ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  3. Estimation Approach • Based on IMP, WSM, (APM) products • Range power profile calculated applying simple threshold masking • Imaging geometry reconstructed from annotation parameters • Re-apply AP corrected in the processor • tan(inc) correction • Combined estimate from all available IM+WS products ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  4. 1474 1610 1975 2111 WS/VV Range Power Profiles at ECR • Approx. 0.5 deg around the beam merging region not used in estimation • Over-compensation at beam edges, especially SS1 ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  5. new old Refined VV Patterns (SS1, IS3-IS6) ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  6. WS Profiles after Pattern Refinement 1474 1610 1975 2111 • Consistent slopes where the beams overlap • Absolute levels agree with cal factor from transponders and expected RF so ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  7. Sample Images HH ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  8. Elevation Beam Patterns - HH • Standard deviation of estimates <0.1dB • Even one homogeneous data set provides useful estimate • Maximum deviation from pre-launch patterns 0.5dB ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  9. Range Power Profiles – IM/HH HH • Gain correction via internal cal to be confirmed • IS1 profiles higher as for VV pol • Assumption on flat gamma profile at low incidence angles not valid? VV ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  10. Range Power Profiles – WS/HH • Consistent slopes where the beams overlap • Processing gains as for VV pol – different levels in SS4/SS5 • Absolute levels too high by 3dB because of problems in reading XCH file ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  11. Sample Images AP/VH ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  12. Elevation Beam Patterns - VH ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  13. Range Power Profiles – AP VV/VH • Reasonable flat co-pol profiles using patterns derived from IM/WS • Problems with cal pulses in some beams • Mixture of PDS data and products from instable standalone version ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  14. Sample Images AP/HV ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  15. Elevation Beam Patterns - HV ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  16. Range Power Profiles – AP HH/HV • Consistent processing based on reference energy levels for normalisation • No data for IS3&IS6 • Cross-pol ~6dB below co-pol ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  17. Range Power Profiles – AP ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  18. Difference Pre-Launch – RF Patterns / VV • Residual receiver gain droop would cause consistent near-to-far range trend • No trend visible • Confirmation of gain droop compensation ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  19. Difference Pre-Launch – RF Patterns • Accuracy of pre-launch measurement does not match highly accurate RF estimates • Limited control/knowledge of module gain/phase settings during pre-launch characterisation IS1 IS7 IS4 ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  20. Conclusions • Elevation patterns for all beams – except HV IS3&IS6 • ScanSAR beams fine-tuned at beam boundaries • Absolute levels to be confirmed (internal cal corrections not fully reliable) • Cross-pol 6dB lower than co-pol • No residual gain droop effects • Difference to pre-launch patterns due to limitations in the on-ground characterisation ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  21. ASAR External Characterisation M. Zink & H. Jackson ENVISAT Programme ESA-ESTEC ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  22. P1 Ground Receiver External Characterization Mode • Cal Pulse P1 (cw) recorded onboard and by coherent ground receiver Tx Aux Radiating Row Signal BFN Tx Main Rx Main Cal BFN Cal Rx Aux ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  23. External Characterization Results (1) • Signal received by transponder • Phase from single column transmission is used to correct row stepping sequence ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  24. VV External Characterization Results (2) • Phase and amplitude difference between onboard recording and receiver measurements • Linear phase term due to off-boresight position of transponder • Residual linear phase due roll mispointing (offset between mechanical and electrical boresight) • Measured values [deg]: V: 0.070, 0.057, 0.066 H: 0.015, 0.011 • Good agreement with boresight from synthesized IS0 beam ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  25. External Characterization Results (3) • Consistent results for H pol from two measurements ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  26. Comparison ExChar Factors in V and H • higher amplitude variations across the 32 rows in H than V • Phase shows similar spread ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  27. Verification of ASAR ISP Datation • Requirement: 200 ms • RA-2 datation accuracy very similar: between -300 and –400 ms ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  28. Conclusions • Consistent measurements in both polarisations • Roll misalignment confirmed by pattern synthesis based on actual Module Stepping mode measurements • EC factors close to 1.0 and therefore small impact on elevation gain reconstruction • EC factors are different for H and V – different HW • ASAR datation error currently around 380ms ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

  29. External Characterization Mode (2) • Single column transmission followed by row stepping sequence and single column transmission ENVISAT Cal/Val Workshop – ESRIN – 9/13 December 2002

More Related