1 / 4

OpenADR Future Developments (Section 11 of OpenADR V 1.0)

OpenADR Future Developments (Section 11 of OpenADR V 1.0). Key Objectives Expand OpenADR to additional DR programs and dynamic tariffs Engage a larger audience of stakeholders and industry experts for further development.

mikel
Download Presentation

OpenADR Future Developments (Section 11 of OpenADR V 1.0)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OpenADR Future Developments(Section 11 of OpenADR V 1.0) • Key Objectives • Expand OpenADR to additional DR programs and dynamic tariffs • Engage a larger audience of stakeholders and industry experts for further development. • Continue collaboration with formal industry standards development organizations.

  2. OpenADR Future Developments(Section 11 of OpenADR V 1.0) • Feedback from Facilities to Utility or ISO • Security of Communications Channel • Network Scalability • Improve Readability • Expansion of Client Interfaces (E.g. OPC) • Harmonization with Industry – Underway • Ancillary Services (Fast DR) – Underway. • Implementation and Compliance Guidelines

  3. Sample - Feedback Feedback – any information from the facility that aids in the DR operations (i.e. before, during, after the DR Event) Q: What if anything should OpenADR say about feedback? Q: What are requirements for feedback? V1.0: Potentially include feedback to a future version of document.

  4. Sample - Security • Security • Q: Should there be more security roles or a further restriction of existing roles? • Q: What is the scope on types of security required as part of the Standard? Should WS security be more strongly defined and made a requirement? • V1.0: Added more material related to the security analysis and requirements. Probably more needs to be done!

More Related