1.03k likes | 1.21k Views
Solar Energy II. Lecture #9 HNRT 228 Energy and the Environment. Chapter 4 Summary. Energy from the Sun Spoke way too much about this in our last meeting Today’s focus Photovoltaic systems Making electricity directly Solar Thermal Systems Electric power generation indirectly
E N D
Solar Energy II Lecture #9 HNRT 228 Energy and the Environment
Chapter 4 Summary • Energy from the Sun • Spoke way too much about this in our last meeting • Today’s focus • Photovoltaic systems • Making electricity directly • Solar Thermal Systems • Electric power generation indirectly • Passive solar systems
iClicker Question The release of energy from the Sun is accompanied by a very slight A increase in the Sun's gravitational attraction on the planets B increase in the Sun's rotation rate C decrease in the mass of the Sun D all of the above are true E none of the above are true
iClicker Question The release of energy from the Sun is accompanied by a very slight A increase in the Sun's gravitational attraction on the planets B increase in the Sun's rotation rate C decrease in the mass of the Sun D all of the above are true E none of the above are true
iClicker Question Most of the Sun's energy is produced in A supergranules B the convection zone C the photosphere D the chromosphere E the core
iClicker Question Most of the Sun's energy is produced in A supergranules B the convection zone C the photosphere D the chromosphere E the core
iClicker Question Energy generation in the Sun results from • A fission of uranium • B fission of hydrogen • C gravitational contraction • D the Sun isn't generating energy • E fusion of hydrogen
iClicker Question Energy generation in the Sun results from • A fission of uranium • B fission of hydrogen • C gravitational contraction • D the Sun isn't generating energy • E fusion of hydrogen
iClicker Question The highest temperatures found in the Sun’s atmosphere is located in the • A chromosphere • B corona • C photosphere • D core • E cytosphere
iClicker Question The highest temperatures found in the Sun’s atmosphere is located in the • A chromosphere • B corona • C photosphere • D core • E cytosphere
iClicker Question Sunspot cycles are, on the average, what length? • A 22 years • B 11 years • C 5.5 years • D 1 year • E 3 years
iClicker Question Sunspot cycles are, on the average, what length? • A 22 years • B 11 years • C 5.5 years • D 1 year • E 3 years
The Solar Spectrum above the atmosphere at ground level O2 H2O Atmospheric absorption H2O H2O,CO2 H2O, CO2
How much energy is available? • Above the atmosphere, we get 1368 W/m2 of radiated power from the sun, across all wavelengths • This number varies by ±3% as our distance to the sun increases or decreases (elliptical orbit) • The book uses 2 calories per minute per cm2 • At the ground, this number is smaller due to scattering and absorption in the atmosphere • about 63%, or ~850 W/m2 with no clouds, perpendicular surface • probably higher in dry desert air
Making sense of the data • Derived from the previous figure • 52% of the incoming light hits clouds, 48% does not • 25% + 10% + 17% • in cloudless conditions, half (24/48) is direct, 63% (30/48) reaches the ground • in cloudy conditions, 17/52 = 33% reaches the ground • about half of the light of a cloudless day • averaging all conditions, about half of the sunlight incident on the earth reaches the ground • the analysis is simplified • assumes atmospheric scattering/absorption is not relevant when cloudy
Comparable numbers • Both versions indicate about half the light reaching (being absorbed by) the ground • 47% vs. 51% • Both versions have about 1/3 reflected back to space • 34% vs. 30% • Both versions have about 1/5 absorbed in the atmosphere/clouds • 19% vs. 19%
iClicker Question • Roughly what percentage of light from the Sun reaches the ground? • A 10% • B 20% • C 30% • D 40% • E 50%
iClicker Question • Roughly what percentage of light from the Sun reaches the ground? • A 10% • B 20% • C 30% • D 40% • E 50%
Energy Balance • Note that every bit of the energy received by the sun is reflected or radiated back to space • If this were not true, earth’s temperature would change until the radiation out balanced the radiation in • In this way, we can compute surface temperatures of other planets (and they compare well with measurements)
Average Insolation • The amount of light received by a horizontal surface (in W/m2) averaged over the year (day & night) is called the insolation • We can make a guess based on the facts that on average: • half the incident light reaches the ground • half the time it is day • the sun isn’t always overhead, so that the effective area of a horizontal surface is half it’s actual area • half the sphere (2R2) projects into just R2 for the sun • twice as much area as the Sun “sees” • So 1/8 of the incident sunlight is typically available at the ground • 171 W/m2 on average
Insolation variation • While the average insolation is 171 W/m2, variations in cloud cover and latitude can produce a large variation in this number • A spot in the Sahara (always sunny, near the equator) may have 270 W/m2 on average • Alaska, often covered in clouds and at high latitude may get only 75 W/m2 on average • Is it any wonder that one is cold while one is hot?
iClicker Question What is the definition of insolation? • A The effective solar insulation factor. • B The amount of light received by a horizontal surface averaged over the year. • C The amount of light received by a unit area of the atmosphere averaged over the year. • D There is none, it is a mis-spelling of insulation. • E The amount of insulation that is received from the Sun.
iClicker Question What is the definition of insolation? • A The effective solar insulation factor. • B The amount of light received by a horizontal surface averaged over the year. • C The amount of light received by a unit area of the atmosphere averaged over the year. • D There is none, it is a mis-spelling of insulation. • E The amount of insulation that is received from the Sun.
Average daily radiation received ranges in W/m2: < 138 138–162 162–185 185–208 208–231 > 231 divide by 24 hr to get average kW/m2
Tilted Surfaces • Can effectively remove the latitude effect by tilting panels • raises incident power on the panel, but doesn’t let you get more power per unit area of (flat) real estate tilted arrangement flat arrangement
Which is best? • To tilt, or not to tilt? • If the materials for solar panels were cheap, then it would make little difference (on flat land) • If you have a limited number of panels (rather than limited flat space) then tilting is better • If you have a slope (hillside or roof), then you have a built-in gain • Best solution of all (though complex) is to steer and track the sun
Numerical Comparison:Winter at 40º latitude based on clear, sunny days better in summer good in winter 2nd place overall winner
Total available solar energy • Looking at average insolation map (which includes day/night, weather, etc.) • estimated average of 4.25 kWh/day = 177 W/m2 • The area of the U.S. is 3.615106 square miles • this is 9.361012 m2 • Multiplying gives 1.661015 Watts average available power • Multiply by 3.1557107 seconds/year gives 5.231022 Joules every year • This is 501018 Btu, or 50,000 QBtu • Compare to annual budget of about 100 QBtu • 500 times more sun than current energy budget
So why don’t we go solar? • What would it take? • To convert 1/500th of available energy to useful forms, would need 1/500th of land at 100% efficiency • about the size of New Jersey • But 100% efficiency is unrealistic: try 15% • now need 1/75th of land • Pennsylvania-sized (100% covered) • Can reduce area somewhat by placing in S.W.
Making sense of the big numbers • How much area is this per person? • U.S. is 9.361012 m2 • 1/75th of this is 1.251011 m2 • 300 million people in the U.S. • 416 m2 per person 4,500 square feet • this is a square 20.4 meters (67 ft) on a side • one football field serves only about 10 people! • much larger than a typical person’s house area • rooftops can’t be the whole answer, especially in cities
Alternatives for using solar energy • Direct heating of flat panel (fluids, space heating) • Passive heating of well-designed buildings • Thermal power generation (heat engine) via concentration of sunlight • Direct conversion to electrical energy (photovoltaics)
Methods of Harvesting Sunlight Passive: cheap, efficient design; block summer rays; allow winter Solar Thermal: ~30% efficient; cost-competitive; requires direct sun; heats fluid in pipes that then boils water to drive steam turbine Solar hot water: up to 50% efficient; several $k to install; usually keep conventional backup; freeze protection vital Photovoltaic (PV): direct electricity; 15% efficient; $8 per Watt to install without rebates/incentives; small fraction of roof covers demand of typ. home Biofuels, algae, etc. also harvest solar energy, at few % eff.
n-type silicon p-type silicon Photovoltaic (PV) Scheme • Highly purified silicon (Si) from sand, quartz, etc. is “doped” with intentional impurities at controlled concentrations to produce a p-n junction • p-n junctions are common and useful: diodes, CCDs, photodiodes • A photon incident on the p-n junction liberates an electron • photon disappears, any excess energy goes into kinetic energy of electron (heat) • electron wanders around drunkenly, and might stumble into “depletion region” where electric field exists • electric field sweeps electron across the junction, constituting a current • more photons more electrons more current more power photon of light Si doped with phosphorous, e.g. electric field Si doped with boron, e.g. liberated electron
Provide a circuit for the electron flow • Without a path for the electrons to flow out, charge would build up and end up canceling electric field • must provide a way out • direct through external load • PV cell becomes a battery current flow external load
iClicker Question Which of the following is NOT a viable application of solar energy? • A Direct heating of flat panels • B Passive heating of well-designed buildings • C Thermal power generation via concentration of sunlight • D Direct conversion to electrical energy • E Concentration of heat energy to develop nuclear energy
iClicker Question Which of the following is NOT a viable application of solar energy? • A Direct heating of flat panels • B Passive heating of well-designed buildings • C Thermal power generation via concentration of sunlight • D Direct conversion to electrical energy • E Concentration of heat energy to develop nuclear energy
PV types • Single-crystal silicon • 15–18% efficient, typically • expensive to make (grown as big crystal) • Poly-crystalline silicon • 12–16% efficient • cheaper to make (cast in ingots) • Amorphous silicon (non-crystalline) • 4–8% efficient • cheapest per Watt • called “thin film” • easily deposited on a wide range of surface types
How good can it get? • Silicon is transparent at wavelengths longer than 1.1 microns (1100 nm) • 23% of sunlight passes right through with no effect • Excess photon energy is wasted as heat • near-infrared light (1100 nm) typically delivers only 51% of its photon energy into electrical current energy • red light (700 nm) only delivers 33% • blue light (400 nm) only delivers 19% • All together, the maximum efficiency for a silicon PV in sunlight is about 23% • but some estimates in the low 30’s also
Silicon Photovoltaic Budget • Only 77% of solar spectrum is absorbed by silicon • Of this, ~30% is used as electrical energy • Net effect is 23% maximum efficiency
PV Cells as “Batteries” • A single PV cell (junction) in the sun acts like a battery • characteristic voltage is 0.58 V • power delivered is current times voltage • current is determined by the rate of incoming solar photons • Stack cells in series to get usefully high voltages • voltage ≠ power, but higher voltage means you can deliver power with less current, meaning smaller wiring, greater transmission efficiency • A typical panel has 36 cells for about 21 V open-circuit (no current delivered) • but actually drops to ~16 V at max power • well suited to charging a nominal 12 V battery 0.58 V +0.58 V +0.58 V +0.58 V +0.58 V +0.58 V 3.5 volts
Typical I-V curves • Typical single panel (this one: 130 W at peak power) • Power is current times voltage, so area of rectangle • max power is 7.6 amps times 17.5 V = 133 W • Less efficient at higher temperatures
iClicker Question • What is roughly the maximum efficiency for a photovoltaic cell? • A 10% • B 15% • C 30% • D 40% • E 50%
iClicker Question • What is roughly the maximum efficiency for a photovoltaic cell? • A 10% • B 15% • C 30% • D 40% • E 50%
How much does it cost? • Solar PV is usually priced in dollars per peak Watt • or full-sun max capacity: how fast can it produce energy • panels cost $4.50 per Watt, installed cost $8/W • so a 3kW residential system is $24,000 to install • CA rebate plus federal tax incentive puts this lower than $5 per peak W • so 3kW system < $15,000 to install • To get price per kWh, need to figure in exposure • rule of thumb: 4–6 hours per day full sun equiv: 3kW system produces ~15 kWh per day • Mythbusting: the energy it takes to manufacture a PV panel is recouped in 3–4 years of sunlight • contrary to myth that they never achieve energy payback
Solar Economics • Consider electricity cost at $0.13 per kWh • PV model: assume 5 hours peak-sun equivalent per day • in one year, get 1800 hours full-sun equivalent • installed cost is $8 per peak Watt capability, no rebates • one Watt installed delivers 1.8 kWh in a year • panel lasts at least 25 years, so 45 kWh for each Watt of capacity • paid $8.00 for 45 kWh, so $0.178/kWh • rebates pull price to < $5/kWh < $0.11/kWh • Assuming energy rates increase at a few % per year, payback is < 15 years • thereafter: “free” electricity • but sinking $$ up front means loss of investment capability • net effect: cost today is what matters to most people • Solar PV is on the verge of “breakout,” but demand may keep prices stable throughout the breakout process