1 / 23

JARVIG 3 (Workshop) E-Journal Archiving Implementation Group

JARVIG 3 (Workshop) E-Journal Archiving Implementation Group. The objective for the third meeting is: To present and elicit reaction on the components, linking elements, roles, actors and actions that will comprise and enable the infrastructure Anticipated Outputs:

mili
Download Presentation

JARVIG 3 (Workshop) E-Journal Archiving Implementation Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JARVIG 3 (Workshop) E-Journal Archiving Implementation Group • The objective for the third meeting is: • To present and elicit reaction on the components, linking elements, roles, actors and actions that will comprise and enable the infrastructure • Anticipated Outputs: • Feedback on and refinement of the infrastructure and action plan

  2. Funding Organisations Internet Archive Infrastructure Providers CERN UK HE Cloud HathiTrust Green OA Repositories UKRR UK Pub Med KB (e-Depot) Institutional Repositories Keepers Registry ArXiv CLOCKSS Knowledgebase+ British Library UK LOCKSS Alliance PECAN PORTICO MetaArchive JISC Collections Campus Based Publishing LOCKSS OCLC Universities Service Providers Maximising Access Transition to e-only Print on Demand Entitlement Registry Research Organisations Agents & Agencies Open Access Licensing University Presses Open Access Journals Subscription Agents Small Publishers Subscriptions Ex Libris Learned Societies Big Deals Large International Publishers Publishers Publishing

  3. Not a plan exactly … but headline categories of work that could be a plan Are we talking about building infrastructure?... 2012-2017 … Why those dates? … Who is going to be responsible for all this?...

  4. We can’t possibly do all of this! ... even if we wanted to

  5. E-Journal Archiving and JISC: Draft Recommendations for Future Activities - Neil Beagrie (2011) JISC/JISC Collections acting more in concert directly (beyond guidance to community) for institutions Develop JISC "archiving principles" for negotiating/evaluating archiving services Explore SHEDL as a possible future model for NESLI Commission a study of e-book preservation requirements, issues, and potential services Continue advocacy and project work with small publishers Continue national/international co-ordination and advocacy on behalf of the sector Develop proposal for UK registry of continuing/perpetual access entitlements for e-journal licences (PECAN) Develop proposal for Registry of e-journal titles and issues included in e-journal archive services (PEPRS) Consultation with other representative bodies such as SCONUL, RLUK, UK LOCKSS consortium

  6. E-Journal Archiving for UK HE Libraries: A White Paper - Neil Beagrie (2011) “For libraries an electronic copy of a journal offers significant potential cost savings over its paper equivalent” … “The costs of e-journal archiving solutions can normally be absorbed into core cash budgets from savings in print journal costs such as binding”… “UK university libraries’ fixed access costs are estimated to fall sharply by £25million per annum as a result of an e-only transition” … (CEPA 2008) “On average, e-only could result in an overall reduction of 17% of [HE College] library expenditures. Other university libraries will reduce their expenditures in the range of 8-10%” …

  7. E-only scholarly journals: overcoming the barriers (November 2010) JISC/RIN/PRC/RLUK

  8. Why do we need a plan?… can’t JISC just get on with it?

  9. At the close of the Windsor Consultation (November 5-7, 2007), assembled leaders from higher education elected to focus further study on three topics for which collaborative efforts among research-intensive universities may alleviate substantial market failures in post-secondary education. 1. “Sustainable Archiving of Digital Texts” Statement of Problem The capacity of university research libraries and other academic centers of information collection to realize long-term cost savings afforded by digital storage depends on the development of a sustainable archiving mechanism.

  10. Breakout Groups

  11. Priority Planning Breakout Exercise Each group should fill out ONE form. Please nominate one person per group to try and record any consensus that emerges on priority tasks and their likely success/impact. Each group has a maximum of 20 tokens (in total) they can assign for resource. They can split this total up in any proportions they feel are appropriate across the activities – but they cannot assign more than 20 in total.

More Related