1 / 37

Analyzing the Deteriorating Effects of Acid Precipitation on Natural Landscaping

Analyzing the Deteriorating Effects of Acid Precipitation on Natural Landscaping. Aleesa Muir. All Pictures Taken by Candus Muir. Tables and Graphs Created by Aleesa Muir. PURPOSE.

milo
Download Presentation

Analyzing the Deteriorating Effects of Acid Precipitation on Natural Landscaping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analyzing the Deteriorating Effects of Acid Precipitation on Natural Landscaping Aleesa Muir All Pictures Taken by Candus Muir Tables and Graphs Created by Aleesa Muir

  2. PURPOSE The purpose of this investigation is to explore the susceptibility of rocks to weathering from acid rain (3.8–4.3 pH) as compared to “normal” rain (5.1–5.6 pH). This information would be beneficial because over time rocks deteriorate due to acid rain. As more homeowners, businesses, cities, and landscapers are looking to xeriscape to reduce their carbon footprint, they need to be more knowledgeable about rock choices when it comes to landscaping needs based on different environments encountered.

  3. HYPOTHESIS If comparing the susceptibility of weathering with different types of rocks to acid rain, then the weathering of the rock will increase for all of the rocks. Research indicates that acid rain, compared to “normal” rain, accelerates the chemical weathering process; however, minerals in the rock and the formation of the rock influence how susceptible the rock is to deteriorating. Metamorphic rocks will be the least susceptible to weathering because they are formed by heat and pressure, therefore making them more compact. Sedimentary and igneous rocks will vary in susceptibility to weathering based on the formation of the rock. The cementation between the layers in a sedimentary rock will determine the compaction of the rock and how the rock reacts with acid. The rate at which an igneous rock cools will determine if the rock will be more porous or compact affecting its rate of weathering.

  4. VARIABLES Independent: Type of rocks Dependent: Weathering/deterioration of rocks Control: Rock with “normal” rain (5.1–5.6 pH) Lava Moss Mountain Granite Colorado Moss Siloam Stone Table Mountain Pioneer Granite

  5. CONSTANTS • Amount of raining time; • Volume of rock; • Method of measuring weathering of rock; • Amount of acid rain; • Temperature of environment; • Method of pouring acid rain; • Rain system equipment set-up; • Distance the rain is above the rock; • Speed of the acid rain; • Range of acidity level of rain: • Acidic 3.8–4.3 pH • Normal 5.1–5.6 pH

  6. OPERATIONAL DEFINITION • Method of Measuring the Deterioration of the Rock • Measure the mass (g) of the rocks before the experiment; • Place rocks in respective positions; • Begin acid rain (process) for 7 consecutive days; • Stop acid rain and remove rocks; • Rinse rocks with distilled water; • Allow rocks to dry for 3 consecutive days; • Measure the mass (g) of the rock after • 7 days of drying; • Find the percent lost of mass (g).

  7. ENGINEERING the RAIN SYSTEM Six prototypes were considered prior to the final rain system design. The following eleven slides show the evolution in the development of the rain system. Control Rain System (5.1-5.6 pH) Acid Rain System (3.8-4.3 pH)

  8. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 1

  9. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 2 I changed Prototype1 because I found watering cans and thought it would be a better design. Prototype 2: Changed from a funnel to a watering can.

  10. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 3 Igneous A Acid Rain Control IgneousB I changed Prototype 2 because I tested the pumps and they were not able to pump enough water. MetamorphicA Metamorphic B Sedimentary A Sedimentary B Prototype 3: Changed the type of pump and how the system was set up.

  11. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 3 Cont’d Top View Side View

  12. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 4 I changed Prototype 3 because the water might not be distributed evenly when comparing the rocks at the front and the rocks at the end. Acid Rain – 3.8-4.3 Control“Normal Rain” – 5.1-5.6 Prototype 4: I changed the system to allow for even water distribution.

  13. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 5 I changed Prototype 4 because I wanted a thicker shelf to allow for stability in placement of the rocks. Acid Rain – 3.8-4.3 Control “Normal Rain” – 5.1-5.6 Prototype 5: I changed the shelf that holds the rocks to Plexiglas to allow for greater stability.

  14. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 6 I changed Prototype 5 because the Plexiglas was to hard to cut without cracking. Acid Rain – 3.8-4.3 Control “Normal Rain” – 5.1-5.6 Prototype 6: I changed the platform on which the rocks sit to wood.

  15. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 6 Working on Prototype 6

  16. RAIN SYSTEM PROTOTYPE 7 I changed Prototype 6 because I did not want the glue from the wood to affect/react with the acid. Acid Rain – 3.8-4.3 Control “Normal Rain” – 5.1-5.6 FINAL DESIGN Prototype 7: I changed the platform on which the rocks sit on to a plastic trellis.

  17. Rain System Diagram Drip Line Tubing (15.2×0.6id cm) Tub (75.7 L) PVC Elbow (2.5-1.3 cm) 8-Port Manifold Vinyl Tubing (5.1×1.9id cm) Manifold Valves Adjustable Zip Strip Adjustable Water Flow Port Vinyl Tubing (10.2×1.3id cm) PVC Pipe (1.3-2.5 cm) Vertical Pipe (15.2×1.3id cm) PVC Pipe (1.3-2.5 cm) Vinyl Tubing (5.1×1.3id cm) Spray Heads PVC Pipe Spacer (12.7×2.5cm) PVC Elbow (1.9-1.3 cm) T-Joint PVC Vinyl Tubing (2.5×1.3id cm) PVC Plug Fountain Pump

  18. BUILDING THE RAIN SYSTEM Working on Final Prototype 7

  19. RAIN SYSTEM - PROCEDURE • Cut tubes. • 2 – Vinyl tubing (1.3id cm) [5.1cm long] • 1 – Vinyl tubing (1.3id cm) [10.2cm long] • 1 – Vinyl tubing (1.3id cm) [2.5cm long] • 1 – Vinyl tubing (1.9id cm) [5.1cm long] • 6 – Drip line tubing (0.6id cm) [15.2cm long] • Connect tubes and pipes to form tube system. • Adjust tubes and pipes to desired positions. • Connect pump to tube system. • Zip strip tubes to pipes for tight and secure fit. • Connect spray heads to 15.2cm×0.6cm drip line tubes. • Connect 6 drip line tubes to 8-port manifold. • Place caps over 2 unused drip line ports. • Place tube system and pump into tub centering the vertical PVC pipe (15.2×1.3id cm) in middle of tub. • Measure the top of the vertical PVC pipe to the inside wall of the tub in order to get the lattice radius.

  20. RAIN SYSTEM – PROCEDURE Cont’d • Draw circumference on lattice using the radius measurements. • Use a pencil, marker, and a string to draw a circle. • Make sure there is a hole in the center for vertical pipe to fit through. • Cut lattice circle. • Cut the 2.5cm PVC pipe 12.7cm long and slide the PVC pipe over the 15.2×1.3id cm vertical PVC pipe (lattice will rest on this PVC pipe). • Place lattice flat over the tube system (in the tub). • Align the end of the vertical pipe with the center hole of the lattice. • Place the pump cord threw a slot on the side of the lattice and out of the tub. • Attach 8-port manifold (on top side over lattice) onto vertical pipe (threaded), securing the lattice in between PVC pipe (12.7×2.5cm) and 8-port manifold.

  21. RAIN SYSTEM – PROCEDURE Cont’d • Cut the 10.2cm PVC pipe (15.2 cm long) for drip lines to go over the rocks. • Drill and cut 6 slots 1.3cm down from one end of the PVC (spacing the holes equal distance apart around the PVC). • Place the 15.2×10.2cm PVC pipe over the manifold so it is resting on the lattice. • Attach the 15.2×10.2cm PVC pipe to lattice using zip strips. • Position the 6 drip line tubes in the 1.3cm slots on the PVC pipe (1 drip line per slot). • Pour water in the tub so the pump is fully submerged. • Plug pump into outlet to make water flow and drip line adjustments. • Repeat steps 1 – 19 to assemble a second rain system.

  22. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE • Ensure all rocks have an approximate volume of 100 cmᶟ using Archimedes principle. • Identify the current pH level of the distilled water. • Fill each of the two tubs with approximately 22.7 L of distilled • water. • Create a rainwater solution using sulfuric acid and distilled water. • Normal (control) rain: 5.1 – 5.6 pH • Acid rain: 3.8 – 4.3 pH • Record the pH levels of each type of rain solution in data table. • Set up two rain systems (see diagram 1). • Measure the initial mass (g) of each rock type used in trial. • Record the mass (g) of each rock in the data table. • Verify the rain system is operating as designed. • Place each rock type on a predetermined station number identified within the rain system.

  23. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Cont’d • Initiate the rain systems by plugging in each pump. • Make adjustments (rock or water) to ensure each rock is • receiving optimal water coverage. • Allow the rain system to run for seven (7) consecutive days. • Verify three (3) or more times per day to insure that the rain • system is still operating correctly. • Record the pH of rain in data table one time each day for the 7 days. • Add sulfuric acid to each tub to achieve the correct range of pH • levels. • Normal (control) rain: 5.1 – 5.6 pH • Acid rain: 3.8 – 4.3 pH Preparing to make the acid rain.

  24. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Cont’d • Rinse each rock with distilled water after the conclusion of the 7 days (168 hours.) • Allow the rocks to dry for 7 days. • Identify the ending mass (g) of each rock. • Record the mass (g) of each rock in data table. • Repeat steps 2 - 12 three more times (for a total of 4 trials.) • Based on the previous trial rock location, move each type of • rock counter clock wise to a different station number after • each trial. Chiseling the rocks to create a volume of 100 cm3.

  25. Problems/Solutions • Problem: Rocks were sometimes hard to break • Solution: Use a chisel • Problem: Rocks had weak points and would break into pieces • less than 100cmᶟ • Solution: Get more rocks • Problem: The wood platform could possibly cause chemical changes • Solution: Used all plastic • Problem: Distilled water was too acidic for the control • Solution: Bought different brand; 3rd attempt home delivery service • Problem: 60 GPH pump was too weak • Solution: Bought a stronger pump • Problem: Spray heads possibly varied in pressure • Solution: Rotated the rocks clockwise each trial • Problem: pH tester stopped working • Solution: Borrowed a pH probe from the high school; recalibrated • pH probe as needed; borrowed a second pH probe when the probe • would not recalibrate

  26. TABLE

  27. PRECISION of TRIALS

  28. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS • Precision: • Low Random Error: Showed consistency • Acid: 0.0 – ‘SS’ and ‘TM’ • Control: 0.1 – ‘SS,’ ‘MG,’ ‘TM,’ ‘LM,’ and ‘PG.’ • High Random Error: • Acid: ‘LM’ – 0.4 (porous); ‘CM’ – 0.5 (cement) • Control: ‘CM’ – 0.3 • Acid Rain: • No statistical difference: ‘CM,’ ‘SS,’ ‘MG,’ ‘LM,’ ‘PG’ • Statistical difference: ‘TM’ compared to ‘SS’ and ‘CM’ • Normal Rain (Control): • No statistical difference: ‘CM,’ ‘SS,’ MG,’ ‘LM,’ ‘PG’ • Statistical difference: ‘TM’ compared to ‘MG’ and ‘LM’

  29. LIMITATIONS • Type of rocks • pH of rain • Type of acid • Volume of rocks (100cm3) • Pressure of sprinkler system • Number of days of rain

  30. CONCLUSION • The general pattern of the data shows that the type of rock (independent variable) didaffect the deterioration of the rocks(dependent variable). As the type of rock (IV) varied, the weathering/deterioration of the rocks(DV) varied. All rocks other than ‘TM’ decreased in mass. • The data collected partially supported the original hypothesis. When comparing the metamorphic rocks to the other types of rocks, only one metamorphic rock weathered the least as measured by average percent (%) loss. • Metamorphic • Table Mountain – 0% • Mountain Granite – 0.11 • Sedimentary • Colorado Moss – 0.25% • Siloam Stone – 0.08% • Igneous • Lava Moss - 0.21% • Pioneer Granite - 0.07%

  31. CONCLUSION Cont’d • These findings lead me to conclude that the susceptibility to weathering depends more on the minerals in the rock. • How fast the rock deteriorates does not appear to be due to the type of rock. • Most of the rocks tested did weather more with acid rain when compared to the control (normal rain), leading me to hypothesize that this pattern would be evident in all types of rocks (including ‘Pioneer Granite’ and ‘Table Mountain’) if given enough time. • Further testing is necessary, including an extended period of time, in order to confirm results. • Based on the data collected, my revised hypothesis is if comparing the susceptibility of weathering with different types of rocks to acid rain, then the rocks will weather depending on what minerals make up the rock, and possibly the density of the rock.

  32. FURTHER RESEARCH • Categorize rocks based on mineral composition • Test increasing pH concentrations to see if a mathematical correlation exists between pH level and the amount of deterioration of the rock • Analyze if the density of the rock affects the amount of deterioration associated with acid rain

  33. APPLICATION Investigating how different types of rock weather because of acid rain would be beneficial to homeowners, businesses, cities, and landscapers. Rocks deteriorate over time due to acid rain. The principle behind this test was to find out which type of rock weathered the least in order to preserve the landscape as designed, while saving money in the long term. Based on the data, most rocks weathered more with acid rain compared to normal rain. The only rock that did not weather was ‘Table Mountain’. ‘Table Mountain’ appears to be a rock resistant to acid rain; therefore, this rock would be an ideal choice for longevity.

  34. This concludes my presentation.

More Related